Pentagon fails 8th consecutive audit

1,870 Views | 16 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by tremble
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


"Because the DoD is unable to provide or obtain accurate and reliable data to verify the existence, completeness, or value of its Global Spares Pool assets for the Joint Strike Fighter Program, we could not quantify the material misstatement in the DoD's assets on the Agency-Wide Financial Statements," the report states.

In a statement, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the department "remains steadfast in its commitment to rigorous annual financial statement audits" and that 2025's audit revealed significant progress in financial management as well as recommendations for improvement."

https://breakingdefense.com/2025/12/pentagon-fails-another-audit-restates-2028-goal-to-finally-pass/
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They just need a budget increase to fix it.
Burrus86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Check the under the sofa cushions in all of the Pentagon offices…the loose change will balance the budget.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has anyone checked the black ops UAP accounts?
TA-OP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do we?
APHIS AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The reason why the DoD or I mean the Department of War will never, ever pass an audit is primarily due to that their is no accountability as to the billions wasted on fraud and abuse.

A few years ago, Fort Hood was fined $5 million dollars by the EPA due to poor monitoring of fuel leakage and toxic waste.

The commanding general just called the Pentagon and the $5 million appeared in their budget to pay the fine.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In 2013, the Marine Corps proudly proclaimed that is was the first service component to pass a full financial audit. A few months later, when OSD CAPE reviewed the audit and found a lot of termites in the woodwork. The Marine Corps then de-certified the audit and undertook to do another one in two years after a campaign called Financial Improvements for Audit Readiness (FIAR).

In 2014, I took over a program management office and inherited ~$180 million of EOPR which stands for Equipment Off Property Records. My program office had, since before 9-11-2001, contracted to buy systems and fielded them to end users around the globe without creating a property record in the Defense Property Accounting System (DPAS).

When I realized this, I told my (incompetent) NH-IV logistician that I would not sign the quarterly property account statement without crossing out the statement that, "I have verified the physical presence and serviceable condition of all property on this account" and adding instead a statement that I cannot verify the presence or condition of the property on this account because it is not in my custody." Senior civilian staff tried to coerce me into signing it with the rationale that it was just business as usual. I told them I wouldn't sign the audit and that they could tell the CG why I was refusing and we could all give our opinions to the IG on what should be done about the $180 million accounting discrepancy.

The "right answer" was to retroactively create a property record for all of that stuff and then go to the commander who was in physical possession of the assets and have them sign for it. This stuff wasn't weapons, vehicles, and C5ISR. It was all in the category of Garrison Property Plant & Equipment (GPP&E) scattered from Okinawa to Quantico and all points in between. That same year, about $250,000 of my EOPR was transferred into the possession of the Houthis when they seized the US embassy in Sanaa. That was an easy write-off.

Not surprisingly, when my LNOs presented DPAS property receipts to the commanders' designated Responsible Officers, the answer they got in reply was almost invariably, "I'm not signing for sh*t. Get those property receipts out of my face." Then the LNO would show them a disposition letter authorizing them to take possession of "my property" and send it to salvage where I could get a receipt and remove it from my property account. That usually persuaded them to add the items to their property account rather than see it disappear.

$180 million is decimal dust on the Pentagon's balance sheet. There are probably hundreds of officers that had larger EOPR discrepancies than the one I inherited. All of it pales in comparison to the dollar value of the property that was gifted to the Taliban in August 2021.
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watch the Age of Disclosure and it all makes sense….the Air Force is taking in a lot of money.
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Withhold the salary of those responsible until they pass the audit. Additionally, for each year they do not pass, make them pay for their health insurance benefits, freeze their pensions, and confiscate 10% of their pension.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not that there isn't likely a huge amount of waste, fraud, and abuse, but wouldn't an audit present a possible national security risk? That's always been a point of confusion for me on this topic.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ulysses90 said:

In 2013, the Marine Corps proudly proclaimed that is was the first service component to pass a full financial audit. A few months later, when OSD CAPE reviewed the audit and found a lot of termites in the woodwork. The Marine Corps then de-certified the audit and undertook to do another one in two years after a campaign called Financial Improvements for Audit Readiness (FIAR).

In 2014, I took over a program management office and inherited ~$180 million of EOPR which stands for Equipment Off Property Records. My program office had, since before 9-11-2001, contracted to buy systems and fielded them to end users around the globe without creating a property record in the Defense Property Accounting System (DPAS).

When I realized this, I told my (incompetent) NH-IV logistician that I would not sign the quarterly property account statement without crossing out the statement that, "I have verified the physical presence and serviceable condition of all property on this account" and adding instead a statement that I cannot verify the presence or condition of the property on this account because it is not in my custody." Senior civilian staff tried to coerce me into signing it with the rationale that it was just business as usual. I told them I wouldn't sign the audit and that they could tell the CG why I was refusing and we could all give our opinions to the IG on what should be done about the $180 million accounting discrepancy.

The "right answer" was to retroactively create a property record for all of that stuff and then go to the commander who was in physical possession of the assets and have them sign for it. This stuff wasn't weapons, vehicles, and C5ISR. It was all in the category of Garrison Property Plant & Equipment (GPP&E) scattered from Okinawa to Quantico and all points in between. That same year, about $250,000 of my EOPR was transferred into the possession of the Houthis when they seized the US embassy in Sanaa. That was an easy write-off.

Not surprisingly, when my LNOs presented DPAS property receipts to the commanders' designated Responsible Officers, the answer they got in reply was almost invariably, "I'm not signing for sh*t. Get those property receipts out of my face." Then the LNO would show them a disposition letter authorizing them to take possession of "my property" and send it to salvage where I could get a receipt and remove it from my property account. That usually persuaded them to add the items to their property account rather than see it disappear.

$180 million is decimal dust on the Pentagon's balance sheet. There are probably hundreds of officers that had larger EOPR discrepancies than the one I inherited. All of it pales in comparison to the dollar value of the property that was gifted to the Taliban in August 2021.


Yeah, yeah ...but...how were your TPS reports?
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I will admit.

I don't like auditors.

At all.
Aggie Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not surprising. I work for a 3-star. In the past 18 months, we've had two people arrested. One for stealing $500K and another for stealing $110M. Yes, million.

Funny thing. The $110M was mostly used to buy property, houses, jewelry, and cars. When auctioned off, the Army made more back than was stolen.
When the truth comes out, do not ask me how I knew.
Ask yourself why you did not.
Helicopter Ben
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Infantry said:

Not surprising. I work for a 3-star. In the past 18 months, we've had two people arrested. One for stealing $500K and another for stealing $110M. Yes, million.

Funny thing. The $110M was mostly used to buy property, houses, jewelry, and cars. When auctioned off, the Army made more back than was stolen.

So IOW, a fraudster thief was more competent at managing money than the government….

It'd be comical if not so infuriating that this money is taken from us. The scope and magnitude of all this waste and fraud is staggering. Just pick literally anything the government spends money on and, at best, it's probably 90% waste/fraud. Complete lack of accountability has emboldened them so much that it doesn't even seem like they try to hide it anymore.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Government sucks!
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It will never pass because there are too many secret pots of money for things they'll never disclose to the public. Some (black ops, weapon research etc) legitimate but plenty that's just grift.

Pentagon Games is still a relevant and great movie
tremble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Infantry said:

Not surprising. I work for a 3-star. In the past 18 months, we've had two people arrested. One for stealing $500K and another for stealing $110M. Yes, million.

Funny thing. The $110M was mostly used to buy property, houses, jewelry, and cars. When auctioned off, the Army made more back than was stolen.


IMCOM? Seriously ****ed up **** going on there.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.