SunrayAg said:
BlackGold said:
SunrayAg said:
I've never seen a "Christian" street preacher who was there for any purpose but to attack and be confrontational. I saw one in Houston scream at a group of little girls wearing shorts that they were dressed like *****s, and scream at the parents walking with them "why do you dress your daughters like *****s?" Also saw some angry parents ready to knock some teeth out.
I suppose confrontational a-holes trying to start trouble can speak freely, but don't cry about it when somebody starts swinging.
This is about cops arresting Christians for their first amendment rights, not about upsetting some amoral idiots passing by. You don't get to arrest people for speech in America. Period. Stop trying to justify it.
So people are "amoral idiots" because they got angry when they were walking through downtown Houston with pre-teen daughters wearing shorts, and some pretend Christian screamed that they are dressed like *****s?
I guess you are one of them…
Oh good Lord, are you in a relationship with, or share kinship to, AggieTerri???
Aside from an apparent shared disdain for Christians, whenever another employs an absolute like "never" (or "always") in their comment, I immediately question the veracity of any claims they make therein.
Naturally, beyond my initial inclination to call BS on "every" encounter you 'allegedly' had or witnessed involving an 'alleged' Christian street preacher, I'm now curious what are YOUR motivations behind the moronic reasoning you stated & implied in the "Free Speech" scenario you cited that only involved words (since "speech" has been defined by the SCOTUS to include conduct/ actions too; I felt that's an important distinction to make).
Specifically, are you advocating for &/or justifying physical retaliation against another based solely upon one's subjective impression, conclusion, &/or inference towards what someone said, even if such is weighed heavily by a subjective religious intolerance &/or simple idiocy???
In other words, have you ever witnessed a "pretend" Muslim street preacher say &/or preach anything that you perceived was subjectively inappropriate to another, especially YOURSELF? If so, would it be OK then if that "pretend" Muslim got assaulted; is there any chance physically assaulting another b/c they were 'preaching' their religious preference be considered a "hate crime" in your or Terri's world??
Lastly, do you realize Texas is a "mutual combat" state? For the most part, this means 2 parties can mutually agree to engage in physical combat with one another. Therefore, why don't you try that instead of going straight to battery/ assault?
After all, at least in Texas, "Progressive Vigilantes" MIGHT insulate themselves from a 'hate crime' charge IF they prove they aren't filled with hate towards another solely b/c of their race, sexual preference, gender, religion, country of origin, etc.
IMHO, that's a tall ask b/c it's the very definition of 'those people'; accordingly, an effective defense must demonstrate & emphasize they are an impulsive, shallow-minded, meat-headed ******bag that cannot "live & let live" and must instead challenge people to fights in a "Mutual Combat State" b/c doing so is next-level 'virtue signaling', as well as indicative of other generally low IQ folks, which defines a 'Progressive' b/c they are so easily manipulated to 'hate' others, especially Christianity & not any other religion, irrespective of what a non-Christian might potentially say or do in their presence, & absolutely under similar circumstances even if/when such is OBJECTIVELY offensive to a reasonable person.
I hope y'all keep this is mind; oh, & Merry CHRISTmas to you & yours!!