How hate for Erika Kirk got out of control

10,622 Views | 151 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by schmellba99
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRM said:

Maybe if there weren't dumbass grifters like Candace pushing stupid conspiracy garbage, there would be nothing to amplify.


Idiots on this board were saying she should be vice president not that long ago.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
for all the Candace Nazi lovers-

she literally just posted the operation to liberate Venezuela was done because....

"Erika Kirk is a globalist."
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer_J said:

Ag with kids said:

Farmer_J said:

GAC06 said:

Farmer_J said:

GAC06 said:

Farmer_J said:

GAC06 said:

Who made the supposed statements you're referring to?


They're not "supposed", it's how the whole ordeal went down. Bill ackman was one of the donors. Just like I stated, it was at first denied there was even a meeting and candace was of course called crazy. There was denials from the donors, and from tpusa employees. Candace posted the text messages from Charlie, and within a day or 2 everyone acknowledged that they were real.



Who made the statements?


I just told you. Klovet came out and finally acknowledged the texts were real.



Klovet? Am I supposed to know who that is? Who made the statements you posted? Who made the statements you posted?


If you don't know who that is, you should probably sit out this discussion.


The fact that you don't know his name is Kolvet means maybe YOU should sit out the discussion.


OMG A TYPO!!!

Your Dimaggio like streak of saying nothing of importance remains unbroken. Seriously, unless you have something to say or want to make a logical argument move along.



Well, you spelled it wrong every single time, you posted his name, so that's lots of typos…
You can turn off signatures, btw
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

for all the Candace Nazi lovers-

she literally just posted the operation to liberate Venezuela was done because....

"Erika Kirk is a globalist."

Seriously? She is mentally ill.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

for all the Candace Nazi lovers-

she literally just posted the operation to liberate Venezuela was done because....

"Erika Kirk is a globalist."


Didn't know she was Delta!!


She never ceases to impress!
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sea Speed said:

TRM said:

Maybe if there weren't dumbass grifters like Candace pushing stupid conspiracy garbage, there would be nothing to amplify.


Idiots on this board were saying she should be vice president not that long ago.


I think idiots here were shilling for Erika to be VP.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
infinity ag said:

Sea Speed said:

TRM said:

Maybe if there weren't dumbass grifters like Candace pushing stupid conspiracy garbage, there would be nothing to amplify.


Idiots on this board were saying she should be vice president not that long ago.


I think idiots here were shilling for Erika to be VP.


No one claimed they were.

I'm Gipper
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRobSA said:

LMCane said:

for all the Candace Nazi lovers-

she literally just posted the operation to liberate Venezuela was done because....

"Erika Kirk is a globalist."


Didn't know she was Delta!!


She never ceases to impress!

Just Delta?

Pfft, Kppa Kappa Gama or que se vayan a la Ching...
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

infinity ag said:

I don't know Erika but...

I just don't like her. I just get a very bad feeling. She seems fake to me and too much drama. If I lost my spouse, I would be in depression for months/years and deal with it in private with my family or with a doctor. Not on stage with well-curated lines. But then I guess everyone is different.

Liked Charlie, do not like Erika. I wish her well though. I think she will find another man pretty quickly and marry him and give some religious justification for doing so. Her moving-on will be quick.

I lost my wife in 2012. It did mess me up. But, you have to keep on living your life, especially if you have kids.

Work for me was actually cathartic. It gave me a purpose beyond just my kids (all but 2 were grown by then and the other 2 were at the end of HS).

So, I fully understand her throwing her life into this...


This.

I know a few folks that have lost wives that returned to work way faster than they could have, simply because they needed to find a way to return to some form of normalcy in their lives. Doesnt mean they didnt still grieve, just means they needed an outlet to distrsct them from what happened and to get them back in as close to normal day to day life as possible.

And this thread shows just how freaking soft we are - the idea that a woman is supposed to wear all black veils and sit in a dark room by herself clutching a picture of her dead husband for some preset amount of time before she can return to society is just stupid.

Woman have always had to take the mantle when their husbands died, and for most of history they didnt have the luxury of taking any time off, much less whatever amount you personally think is the correct amount. And Erika is far from the first widow to take the torch and continue the legacy of her husbands work after he died. Plenty of historical examples of women doing this very thing going back to the time before we kept written records reliably.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Speed said:

TRM said:

Maybe if there weren't dumbass grifters like Candace pushing stupid conspiracy garbage, there would be nothing to amplify.


Idiots on this board were saying she should be vice president not that long ago.


Maybe before she went insane.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She was always a grifter.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer_J said:

Ag with kids said:

Farmer_J said:

Phatbob said:

I can come up with some wild **** about your left pinky toe being involved, in which your surprise in such an insane and stupid theory being taken seriously may contribute to some inconsistencies in your story about said pink toe, but that still doesn't mean your pinky toe had anything to do with it, even if I have come to the conclusion that your "answers" about your left pinky toe are not sufficient to answer my "legitimate" questions.


Which ones aren't plausible? i just went through one example of a 'crazy conspiracy theory' that was proved true.

Next, let's take that the FBI said he was shot with a 30.06. I've shot a lot of animals with 30 caliber rifles over my life. There is no way in my experience he was shot in the neck with a 30.06. You have to do some crazy mental gymnastics to create the magic bullet scenario.

As a bonus, Andrew Klovet immediately posted that he talked to the surgeon and the surgeon told him charlie kirk's neck bones were so healthy and strong they stopped the bullet. First of all, it's a very odd thing to release immediately. It feels like he's trying to compensate for something. Secondly, there's no proof the surgeon told him anything.

For all the npcs, these questions don't "prove" anything - but they're reasonable questions. Any good detective would be questioning this.

Oh god...

You're going to go straight to the ballistics stuff like all the JFK conspiracy theorists go.

Well, have fun with that.




BTW, those questions are only reasonable to someone that needs a lot of mental help...


No, i've hunted a lot and shot a lot of animals. But hey really good argument.

So have I.

And the reaction of Kirk from when he was hit was 100% the reaction of hydrostatic shock from something like a .30-06. I've seen plenty of deer react in almost exactly the same fashion from .243 on up to .300 mag.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.