HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh please. The only way this goes haywire is if DOJ screws it up, and that won't happen here. The group that handles these types of cases aren't the Lindsay Halligan or Alina Habba types. They're seasoned attorneys that know what the **** they're doing.

---

Let's say the DOJ has the best attorneys in the US and all the mountains of hard evidence they need. These jurors are the ones that just elected a socialist to lead them, do you really trust them to convict another socialist no matter the evidence? And do you trust the 92 year old judge that was in on the DJT persecution to run this properly? Seriously?

---

Absolutely.

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Blocking deportation to that country. He's in our custody.

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Blocking deportation to that country. He's in our custody.

---

If they have an indictment and we have extradition treaty with that country, it's pretty much done.

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Blocking deportation to that country. He's in our custody.

---

If they have an indictment and we have extradition treaty with that country, it's pretty much done.

---

No, it's not. I guess you haven't been paying attention the last year. He's not going anywhere without a long court battle first.

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Blocking deportation to that country. He's in our custody.

---

If they have an indictment and we have extradition treaty with that country, it's pretty much done.

---

No, it's not. I guess you haven't been paying attention the last year. He's not going anywhere without a long court battle first.

---

Who last year was indicted for a crime in another country that we had an extradition treaty with? You are right. I missed that.

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Blocking deportation to that country. He's in our custody.

---

If they have an indictment and we have extradition treaty with that country, it's pretty much done.

---

No, it's not. I guess you haven't been paying attention the last year. He's not going anywhere without a long court battle first.

---

Who last year was indicted for a crime in another country that we had an extradition treaty with? You are right. I missed that.

---

So the judges will ignore our laws but not a treaty. LMAO.

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Blocking deportation to that country. He's in our custody.

---

If they have an indictment and we have extradition treaty with that country, it's pretty much done.

---

No, it's not. I guess you haven't been paying attention the last year. He's not going anywhere without a long court battle first.

---

Who last year was indicted for a crime in another country that we had an extradition treaty with? You are right. I missed that.

---

So the judges will ignore our laws but not a treaty. LMAO.

---

Our laws? If he's indicted in another country it's their laws.

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Blocking deportation to that country. He's in our custody.

---

If they have an indictment and we have extradition treaty with that country, it's pretty much done.

---

No, it's not. I guess you haven't been paying attention the last year. He's not going anywhere without a long court battle first.

---

Who last year was indicted for a crime in another country that we had an extradition treaty with? You are right. I missed that.

---

So the judges will ignore our laws but not a treaty. LMAO.

---

Our laws? If he's indicted in another country it's their laws.

---

Oh, so they will ignore our laws and a treaty, but not another county's laws.

Idiocy!!!

---

Logos Stick said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh please. The only way this goes haywire is if DOJ screws it up, and that won't happen here. The group that handles these types of cases aren't the Lindsay Halligan or Alina Habba types. They're seasoned attorneys that know what the **** they're doing.

---

Let's say the DOJ has the best attorneys in the US and all the mountains of hard evidence they need. These jurors are the ones that just elected a socialist to lead them, do you really trust them to convict another socialist no matter the evidence? And do you trust the 92 year old judge that was in on the DJT persecution to run this properly? Seriously?

---

Absolutely.

---

LoL, not surprised at your post.

This is a criminal case. At least one of the 12 jurors will be a Marxist who voted for Mamdani. Mamdani says the action was a violation of federal law. The odds of a mistrial are almost a lock.

---

The Biden administration had a $25MM bounty on Maduro before Trump doubled it. But sure, it's going to end up in a mistrial.

---

I'll wager $500 to fav charity it is a mistrial or not guilty if it goes to trial.

Eta: this wager must be explicitly accepted by htownag98 and must be set up with a proxy to hold funds before the trial begins. I post this because I had some idiot on the football board who never accepted my bet claiming I owed him after the fact.

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh please. The only way this goes haywire is if DOJ screws it up, and that won't happen here. The group that handles these types of cases aren't the Lindsay Halligan or Alina Habba types. They're seasoned attorneys that know what the **** they're doing.

---

Let's say the DOJ has the best attorneys in the US and all the mountains of hard evidence they need. These jurors are the ones that just elected a socialist to lead them, do you really trust them to convict another socialist no matter the evidence? And do you trust the 92 year old judge that was in on the DJT persecution to run this properly? Seriously?

---

Absolutely.

---

I'd love to hear why you trust people like that, unless you're one of them.

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Science Denier said:

---

Quote:

---

if we don't get him here, I am sure there is another country, maybe Argentina, that has him indicted there as well.

---

We should be getting on this right now. Would be awesome to have a backup plan to send this dude somewhere else when corruption takes over.

---

You think a liberal Federal judge won't block it?! This guy is worth waaaay more to the left than Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He's not going anywhere.

---

Block a foreign court from indicting them in their own country? No, I don't think a federal judge would block that.

---

Blocking deportation to that country. He's in our custody.

---

If they have an indictment and we have extradition treaty with that country, it's pretty much done.

---

No, it's not. I guess you haven't been paying attention the last year. He's not going anywhere without a long court battle first.

---

Who last year was indicted for a crime in another country that we had an extradition treaty with? You are right. I missed that.

---

So the judges will ignore our laws but not a treaty. LMAO.

---

Our laws? If he's indicted in another country it's their laws.

---

Oh, so they will ignore our laws and a treaty, but not another county's laws.

Idiocy!!!

---

Which country last year indicted a criminal that we were not allowed to send the criminal to? Nobody.

The guy you are talking about committed a crime here and judge didn't allow him to be deported. He wasn't set for any trial.

That's a pretty big difference.

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh please. The only way this goes haywire is if DOJ screws it up, and that won't happen here. The group that handles these types of cases aren't the Lindsay Halligan or Alina Habba types. They're seasoned attorneys that know what the **** they're doing.

---

Let's say the DOJ has the best attorneys in the US and all the mountains of hard evidence they need. These jurors are the ones that just elected a socialist to lead them, do you really trust them to convict another socialist no matter the evidence? And do you trust the 92 year old judge that was in on the DJT persecution to run this properly? Seriously?

---

Absolutely.

---

LoL, not surprised at your post.

This is a criminal case. At least one of the 12 jurors will be a Marxist who voted for Mamdani. Mamdani says the action was a violation of federal law. The odds of a mistrial are almost a lock.

---

The Biden administration had a $25MM bounty on Maduro before Trump doubled it. But sure, it's going to end up in a mistrial.

---

I'll wager $500 to fav charity it is a mistrial or not guilty if it goes to trial.

Eta: this wager must be explicitly accepted by htownag98 and must be set up with a proxy to hold funds before the trial begins. I post this because I had some idiot on the football board who never accepted my bet claiming I owed him after the fact.

---

I don't bet with random strangers on the internet. So sorry, I won't be taking this bet.

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh please. The only way this goes haywire is if DOJ screws it up, and that won't happen here. The group that handles these types of cases aren't the Lindsay Halligan or Alina Habba types. They're seasoned attorneys that know what the **** they're doing.

---

Let's say the DOJ has the best attorneys in the US and all the mountains of hard evidence they need. These jurors are the ones that just elected a socialist to lead them, do you really trust them to convict another socialist no matter the evidence? And do you trust the 92 year old judge that was in on the DJT persecution to run this properly? Seriously?

---

Absolutely.

---

I'd love to hear why you trust people like that, unless you're one of them.

---

1. The evidence is overwhelming.
2. Trump isn't on trial here.

---

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Democrats really are that dumb.

Q: Would you trade Trump for Maduro?

LIBS: "Yeah. Maduro was democratically elected." 🤯

"Maduro could come be our president? Oh, ANY DAY! All the check marks are there. Not white, he's a minority!" 🤡

"Probably, sure."

"More… pic.twitter.com/u7lnO72fiK

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 4, 2026

Logos Stick said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh please. The only way this goes haywire is if DOJ screws it up, and that won't happen here. The group that handles these types of cases aren't the Lindsay Halligan or Alina Habba types. They're seasoned attorneys that know what the **** they're doing.

---

Let's say the DOJ has the best attorneys in the US and all the mountains of hard evidence they need. These jurors are the ones that just elected a socialist to lead them, do you really trust them to convict another socialist no matter the evidence? And do you trust the 92 year old judge that was in on the DJT persecution to run this properly? Seriously?

---

Absolutely.

---

LoL, not surprised at your post.

This is a criminal case. At least one of the 12 jurors will be a Marxist who voted for Mamdani. Mamdani says the action was a violation of federal law. The odds of a mistrial are almost a lock.

---

The Biden administration had a $25MM bounty on Maduro before Trump doubled it. But sure, it's going to end up in a mistrial.

---

I'll wager $500 to fav charity it is a mistrial or not guilty if it goes to trial.

Eta: this wager must be explicitly accepted by htownag98 and must be set up with a proxy to hold funds before the trial begins. I post this because I had some idiot on the football board who never accepted my bet claiming I owed him after the fact.

---

I don't bet with random strangers on the internet. So sorry, I won't be taking this bet.

---

Why not?! If I don't pay up, you're free to call me out. I would be a pariah at that point.

Using a trusted proxy is done all the time on this board. Surely there is a poster you would trust on here, no?!

---

Logos Stick said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

TRX said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh please. The only way this goes haywire is if DOJ screws it up, and that won't happen here. The group that handles these types of cases aren't the Lindsay Halligan or Alina Habba types. They're seasoned attorneys that know what the **** they're doing.

---

Let's say the DOJ has the best attorneys in the US and all the mountains of hard evidence they need. These jurors are the ones that just elected a socialist to lead them, do you really trust them to convict another socialist no matter the evidence? And do you trust the 92 year old judge that was in on the DJT persecution to run this properly? Seriously?

---

Absolutely.

---

I'd love to hear why you trust people like that, unless you're one of them.

---

1. The evidence is overwhelming.
2. Trump isn't on trial here.

---

Of course. These people are fake and no one like this exists in NYC:

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Democrats really are that dumb.

Q: Would you trade Trump for Maduro?

LIBS: "Yeah. Maduro was democratically elected." 🤯

"Maduro could come be our president? Oh, ANY DAY! All the check marks are there. Not white, he's a minority!" 🤡

"Probably, sure."

"More… pic.twitter.com/u7lnO72fiK

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 4, 2026

---