Dual Citizenship May Soon Be Going Away

3,799 Views | 81 Replies | Last: 50 min ago by Eliminatus
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So it looks like those who hold dual nationality would have to choose, if this gets passed. I don't have any dual nationalities but many do. Some are benign, but some others are not.

How do you think this will change things? Good or bad idea?

Also, I think we need to stop marketing ourselves as a "nation of immigrants". This just signals that foreigners have the right to walk in and use our resources and walk away with no emotion attached. No country can survive this.

Americans may soon be required to only hold one passport
https://www.timeout.com/usa/news/americans-may-soon-be-required-to-only-hold-one-passport-010826
A new Senate bill would force millions of dual citizens to choose between the U.S. and their second nationality.
Quote:

For decades, the U.S. has quietly been one of the chillest countries in the world when it comes to dual citizenship. If you were born in one country and raised in another? Congratulations, keep both passports. Naturalized somewhere new later in life? No problem. But that long-standing flexibility could soon be on the chopping block.

This week, senator Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio, introduced the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025, a bill that would effectively end dual citizenship for Americans. If it becomes law, U.S. citizens would be required to owe "sole and exclusive allegiance" to the United States, meaning they would have to choose just one passport and not be able to hold two symultaneously.

Under the proposal, anyone who already holds U.S. citizenship and another nationality would have one year to decide which one to keep. Stick with America and you'd have to formally renounce your foreign citizenship. Keep the other country and you'd be giving up your U.S. status. New citizens who later acquire foreign citizenship would automatically be considered to have relinquished their American citizenship.
Moreno frames the bill as a matter of loyalty. In announcing the legislation, he argued that citizenship should be "all or nothing," warning that dual nationality can create conflicts of interest and divided allegiances. The bill's findings section echoes that language, saying exclusive citizenship is necessary to preserve the integrity of national identity.

That's a sharp detour from how the U.S. has historically handled this issue. Right now, the law doesn't require Americans to choose between passports, even if they naturalize elsewhere. In fact, millions of people hold U.S. citizenship alongside another nationality, often because of where they were born, where their parents came from or because they built lives in more than one country.
Dual citizens today already juggle legal obligations to both countries, including taxes, military service requirements and travel requirements. They're required to use a U.S. passport when entering or leaving the United States and they sometimes must use their other passport when traveling abroad. While bureaucratic, it's been legal, accepted and increasingly common around the world.
That reality would change fast if the bill is enacted. If the Exclusive Citizenship Act moves forward, it sets a 180-day clock after enactment for the new rules to take effect. Federal agencies will be responsible for tracking compliance and formally reclassifying anyone who fails to make a choice.
For now, it's just a proposal that would still have to clear Congress and survive the sure-to-come legal challenges. But it's already sparking a big question with very personal stakes: in a country built by immigrants, what does loyalty look like in a world where more people than ever belong to more than one place?

Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good.
AozorAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not good, great!!

I'm Gipper
The Fall Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lol a relative just got his citizenship in Mexico. Has dual. This will make a interesting conversation piece if this happens.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LONG OVERDUE
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure there'll be a caveat for at least one state.
CheeseSndwch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm a dual citizen (EU Member State) and I believe there should be restrictions (e.g. holding public office) but I don't think this one is going to pass. Dual Citizenship is a big deal in Israel and they seem to hold a lot of sway.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My kids are dual citizens with a south American nation.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As long as US citizens fulfill all obligations of citizenship including paying all taxes, obeying the law, etc., I don't care if they also have citizenship in another country.

My son is marrying a British girl who's been here since a child and long ago became a naturalized US citizen, along with her parents. She also holds British citizenship from birth. I don't see a problem with that.

I also work with a number of Hispanics who immigrated into this country the right way and later became a US citizen. They still hold birthplace citizenship in their native country, but they are model US citizens in every aspect.

Both of these examples point to people who are much more constructive than some of our own native citizens who aren't responsible and suck off the government teat their entire lives and spawn more generations who do the same.

Let's get rid of those who perpetually cause problems instead of those who are making a positive contribution.
cr06gis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guarantee one country would be exempt
HalifaxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There goes my Canadian anchor baby
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I understand the voluntary aspect here in that the dual citizen makes a choice but still feel a bit uneasy about those already holding such status being stripped of one in a form of ex post facto effect.

OTOH, ending birthright citizenship going forward in conjunction with this would prevent much of dual status in the future..
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
inb4 Dems concoct fake narratives and freak out over voter suppression.
Rydyn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No one is saying that they should lose their US citizenship. They should choose one based on where their true loyalty lies.

The oath of allegiance is pretty clear...I'm surprised dual allegiance was EVER allowed.
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rydyn said:

No one is saying that they should lose their US citizenship. They should choose one based on where their true loyalty lies.

This is tilting at windmills. A solution in search of a problem.

These are model citizens who have done things the right way. Followed the rules.

Running off good people who are making our country better doesn't make sense.

Focus on those who are really causing problems instead. You will find the vast majority are US native citizens who are supposedly "loyal" to the US but in reality are anything but.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MemphisAg1 said:

As long as US citizens fulfill all obligations of citizenship including paying all taxes, obeying the law, etc., I don't care if they also have citizenship in another country.

My son is marrying a British girl who's been here since a child and long ago became a naturalized US citizen, along with her parents. She also holds British citizenship from birth. I don't see a problem with that.

.


So they lied when they took the oath to become citizens renouncing allegiance to other nations?

I'm Gipper
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

MemphisAg1 said:

As long as US citizens fulfill all obligations of citizenship including paying all taxes, obeying the law, etc., I don't care if they also have citizenship in another country.

My son is marrying a British girl who's been here since a child and long ago became a naturalized US citizen, along with her parents. She also holds British citizenship from birth. I don't see a problem with that..


So they lied when they took the oath to become citizens renouncing allegiance to other nations?

Spare me the righteous indignation. Show me a person who can't be accused of lying, misrepresenting, or glossing over something in their life and I might start to care.

These are people who went through the extra effort to actually become a US citizen unlike all those here who claim it just because they were born here and never had to take an oath.

Again, the vast majority of these people aren't the source of our problems. Let's focus on those who are... single country US citizens who are criminals or destroying the culture that made this country great.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Non-citizen becoming US citizen should have to revoke all other citizenships / passports / privileges. It's literally in the oath to become a citizen.

Natural-born US citizen obtaining passport from another country… I have no issue with that but it should disqualify you from holding any public officer, serving in military, and particularly serving in Congress, etc.

Loyalty and allegiance matter. We should be much stricter, more forceful here.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MemphisAg1 said:

Im Gipper said:

MemphisAg1 said:

As long as US citizens fulfill all obligations of citizenship including paying all taxes, obeying the law, etc., I don't care if they also have citizenship in another country.

My son is marrying a British girl who's been here since a child and long ago became a naturalized US citizen, along with her parents. She also holds British citizenship from birth. I don't see a problem with that..


So they lied when they took the oath to become citizens renouncing allegiance to other nations?

Spare me the righteous indignation. Show me a person who can't be accused of lying, misrepresenting, or glossing over something in their life and I might start to care.

These are people who went through the extra effort to actually become a US citizen unlike all those here who claim it just because they were born here and never had to take an oath.

Again, the vast majority of these people aren't the source of our problems. Let's focus on those who are... single country US citizens who are criminals or destroying the culture that made this country great.


So taking the witness stand, you are cool with folks perjuring themselves? Wedding vows mean nothing? Contracts should not be honored? Bizarre take on what it means to take an oath and make a promise.
CheeseSndwch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No oath required for those of us who were born here.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is no righteous indignation.

It was a simple question. Take another shot at answering it.

I'm Gipper
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CheeseSndwch said:

No oath required for those of us who were born here.


I agree.

But that's not what he was talking about.

I'm Gipper
CheeseSndwch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I meant to say some of us have held dual citizenship since birth. There was never a choice/oath involved.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:


So taking the witness stand, you are cool with folks perjuring themselves? Wedding vows mean nothing? Contracts should not be honored? Bizarre take on what it means to take an oath and make a promise.

I never said those things but nice try. Current law allows dual citizenship. The oath should be updated to reflect that.

I don't support going after a non-problem. Others can magnify it into a boogey-man proposition if they want, but it's a non issue. The bill won't make it out of the Senate, and for good reason.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CheeseSndwch said:

I meant to say some of us have held dual citizenship since birth. There was never a choice/oath involved.

Which is why I brought up birthright citizenship in the US. End that and a lot of the dual status from birth goes away in the future.
stetson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The million or more chicoms that were born in the United States will choose America and this does nothing to fix the "Manchurian Candidate" problem that we have.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MemphisAg1 said:

Rydyn said:

No one is saying that they should lose their US citizenship. They should choose one based on where their true loyalty lies.

This is tilting at windmills. A solution in search of a problem.

These are model citizens who have done things the right way. Followed the rules.

Running off good people who are making our country better doesn't make sense.

Focus on those who are really causing problems instead. You will find the vast majority are US native citizens who are supposedly "loyal" to the US but in reality are anything but.


Agreed, I'm trying to figure out what functional problem this solves. It just seems like posturing.
rwv2055
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cr06gis said:

Guarantee one country would be exempt


I agree. Aren't most members of Congress citizens of that nation also?
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't care if it didn't "solve" a thing: if you want the rights, protections, and responsibilities of American citizenship: I don't want you retaining loyalties and back-up plans. You're either in or you're out.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

MemphisAg1 said:

Rydyn said:

No one is saying that they should lose their US citizenship. They should choose one based on where their true loyalty lies.

This is tilting at windmills. A solution in search of a problem.

These are model citizens who have done things the right way. Followed the rules.

Running off good people who are making our country better doesn't make sense.

Focus on those who are really causing problems instead. You will find the vast majority are US native citizens who are supposedly "loyal" to the US but in reality are anything but.


Agreed, I'm trying to figure out what functional problem this solves. It just seems like posturing.

That's exactly what it is. It's a virtue-signaling bill intended to inflame emotions of the MAGA base to "get rid of them foreigners who don't want to Make American Great Again"... when in fact, the vast majority of these people are working hard to MAGA than a lot of native born US citizens who work constantly to undermine this country.

A number of people have taken the bait hook, line, and sinker.

Of the top 50 problems in this country, where does this fit... people who moved to the US, went through the rigorous steps and timeline required to become a US citizen, only to turn coat and conspire against the US government and it's citizens? Where is it in that top 50?

It doesn't even make the list.

Tilting. At. Windmills.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This will hurt Israel.. Are you sure we want this?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think this might be more aimed as a back door challenge to birthright citizenship. It is that principle that gives rise to many with dual status.
zoneag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Israeli lobby will prevent this from ever becoming law
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guess I am not understanding something about how Israel's dual status works? Do those holding both vote in elections both there and here?
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.