Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) September 4, 2021
Epsteinism is the new McCarthyism
4,608 Views |
73 Replies |
Last: 13 days ago by 94chem
Here's my opinion...
With it and a fistful of your own cash you can go to your shop of choice and buy a coffee or donut.
Jeffery Epstein was a sick individual and I'm glad he's dead.
By all accounts he was a dirtbag. I think he definitely liked them young and if/when he could, the younger the better. However my guess is that the overwhelming majority were probably just of age. I bet they were trafficked for sure. I bet they were only partially there of their own will, and I say "partially" because there was probably a bait and switch of some kind involved. The experience was certainly not matching the brochure so-to-speak.
What were the terms of their arrival? Was he going to foreign adoption agencies? I have no idea. What were the ultimate terms of the girls freedom? Again, I have no idea. I would suspect that at some level there was a financial imprisonment and they stuck around out of sheer dependance.
Rich and powerful certainly rub elbows with a lot of other rich and powerful. For that reason alone it makes sense that plenty would be in his "files." Keep a harem of 18-20 yr old coeds that arrived under questionable circumstances around you that will entertain you and your guests, rich and powerful pervs will probably keep their mouth's shut, and a few will probably partake. Keep a couple of 16 yr olds (or even younger) around that will entertain you and your guests and even the perviest are probably to step aside and I'd like to think you'd have trouble getting them to maintain their silence.
Yes there are a bunch of names in there. Yes many of those whose names were in there would probably prefer the names not come out. But my guess is that it's a lot more trafficked 18-20 yr olds than underage girls.
With it and a fistful of your own cash you can go to your shop of choice and buy a coffee or donut.
Jeffery Epstein was a sick individual and I'm glad he's dead.
By all accounts he was a dirtbag. I think he definitely liked them young and if/when he could, the younger the better. However my guess is that the overwhelming majority were probably just of age. I bet they were trafficked for sure. I bet they were only partially there of their own will, and I say "partially" because there was probably a bait and switch of some kind involved. The experience was certainly not matching the brochure so-to-speak.
What were the terms of their arrival? Was he going to foreign adoption agencies? I have no idea. What were the ultimate terms of the girls freedom? Again, I have no idea. I would suspect that at some level there was a financial imprisonment and they stuck around out of sheer dependance.
Rich and powerful certainly rub elbows with a lot of other rich and powerful. For that reason alone it makes sense that plenty would be in his "files." Keep a harem of 18-20 yr old coeds that arrived under questionable circumstances around you that will entertain you and your guests, rich and powerful pervs will probably keep their mouth's shut, and a few will probably partake. Keep a couple of 16 yr olds (or even younger) around that will entertain you and your guests and even the perviest are probably to step aside and I'd like to think you'd have trouble getting them to maintain their silence.
Yes there are a bunch of names in there. Yes many of those whose names were in there would probably prefer the names not come out. But my guess is that it's a lot more trafficked 18-20 yr olds than underage girls.
YouBet said:
While I generally agree with you, I'll just point out that McCarthy has been exonerated at this point.
Maybe a bad example.
I mean, he was right that there were communist spies, but he didn't do a damn thing that actually helped solve the problem. He actively harmed a lot of counter-intelligence work that was being done. Ironically, he probably inadvertently did the opposite of what he intended.
Counterpoint said:Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) September 4, 2021
The admin looks like idiots. There are lots of statements like this by lots of people in the administration.
Now he doesn't talk about because the president said anyone talking about it is a moron and basically not wanted in the party.
The entire Obama administration is taking the biggest hit and its wonderful.
Bill Gates is walking on very thin ice. He stands a good chance of being the first American casualty of note.
Why don't they just release all the files?
Waffledynamics said:
Why don't they just release all the files?
Bc the entire world is implicated for the most part.
Should they release alll the anonymous tips too? I mean all the fbi tips are in the files.
Epsteinism is the new real MAGA. Destroy the Deep State.
redsquirrelAG said:Waffledynamics said:
Why don't they just release all the files?
Bc the entire world is implicated for the most part.
Too Big to Fail.
techno-ag said:
Far more Democrats are implicated in the Epstein files.
But you wouldn't know that from the left-wing news coverage.
There is no way to spin this to make republicans look good.
Look at who is fighting for transparency and who isn't. Those are your friends and enemies. Then look for the R or D.
Trump not personally being implicated is different than Trump still covering this **** up on behalf of others. Why he is doing it is baffling. Complete unforced error.
Aggrad08 said:techno-ag said:
Far more Democrats are implicated in the Epstein files.
But you wouldn't know that from the left-wing news coverage.
There is no way to spin this to make republicans look good.
Look at who is fighting for transparency and who isn't. Those are your friends and enemies. Then look for the R or D.
Regardless of anything else, a Republican released files when a Democrat wouldn't when he could have.
As long as the sheeple are focused on a "client list", they won't learn about Epstein's laundering of illegal Intel ops funded by the taxpayer.
Just like how the sheeple fought over masks and vaccines, instead of root cause analysis on the bioweapon "leak".
Just like how the sheeple fought over masks and vaccines, instead of root cause analysis on the bioweapon "leak".
A lot of Epstein Class of political supporters here, I for one am glad the funstick of consequences without grease is arriving for the Epstein Class. To heck with them!
Aggrad08 said:techno-ag said:
Far more Democrats are implicated in the Epstein files.
But you wouldn't know that from the left-wing news coverage.
There is no way to spin this to make republicans look good.
Look at who is fighting for transparency and who isn't. Those are your friends and enemies. Then look for the R or D.
Trump turned Epstein over to the police. Things like that we found out in the released files and it makes him look very good.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
It's them vs us now. No more party lines. Many elites are in a satanic pedophile club and are protecting each other and have been a since bush sr.
Was he a lone actor catering to other individuals with sick desires, or was he funded and backed by an entity trying to blackmail our US politicians? I have my opinion.
Was he a lone actor catering to other individuals with sick desires, or was he funded and backed by an entity trying to blackmail our US politicians? I have my opinion.
Epstein is used on the left for their political purposes. They bring it up when Trump is in office but quiet as church mice when uncle joe was in office.
techno-ag said:It's predominantly Dems though, as usual in stuff like this. When things start looking bad the dual equivocators come out talking about how both sides do it. That's usually our indicator that's it's starting to look really really bad for the Democrats.The Fall Guy said:
Love it or leave it. Supporting pedophiles and defending your party for pedophiles on either aisle will get you a room in hell with Hitler shoving pineapples up your butt for eternity
Are you aware in reality you're just saying that because you want it to be true? Let's say youre accurate. Why is the current administration working so hard to slow and block the release?
ts5641 said:
Epstein is used on the left for their political purposes. They bring it up when Trump is in office but quiet as church mice when uncle joe was in office.
That's the talking points put out by Trump and of course are repeated over and over.
In addition I don't remember anyone on the left running for office saying as soon as they get in office they would punish everyone involved and release everything!
Now flip that and list most of all of the Trump admin with the exception of Tulsi G who you never hear from other than the FBI blocked her requests. It's sad to see this admin calling their supporters morons for saying exactly the same things they did just a short while ago!
Ellis Wyatt said:
McCarthy was right.
Can you expound a bit? Here's a question that might help you think a bit. Have you ever said the N-word in your life? Or have you ever associated with someone who has?
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
94chem said:Ellis Wyatt said:
McCarthy was right.
Can you expound a bit? Here's a question that might help you think a bit. Have you ever said the N-word in your life? Or have you ever associated with someone who has?
False equivalence, communist ideology is not the same as somebody saying a naughty word.
Which is more full of dumb conspiratorial witch hunts: Q-Anon or Epstein-Anon?
AGHouston11 said:ts5641 said:
Epstein is used on the left for their political purposes. They bring it up when Trump is in office but quiet as church mice when uncle joe was in office.
That's the talking points put out by Trump and of course are repeated over and over.
In addition I don't remember anyone on the left running for office saying as soon as they get in office they would punish everyone involved and release everything!
Now flip that and list most of all of the Trump admin with the exception of Tulsi G who you never hear from other than the FBI blocked her requests. It's sad to see this admin calling their supporters morons for saying exactly the same things they did just a short while ago!
So this is bad Trump because he used it in his campaign rhetoric, had this DOJ and FBI immediately start digging into it, uncovered the ****storm that is millions of files in the Epstein trove, determined there was nothing immediately solid or actionable (and nothing of political leverage), and told everyone to move on.
The morons are the ones who cannot read the paragraph above and understand how we got here. Epstein was made a pure political issue (by both sides, but more by Trump) and the result will be pure political justice. It will be about names and innuendo and very little about any underlying crimes and actual issues.
PaulsBunions said:94chem said:Ellis Wyatt said:
McCarthy was right.
Can you expound a bit? Here's a question that might help you think a bit. Have you ever said the N-word in your life? Or have you ever associated with someone who has?
False equivalence, communist ideology is not the same as somebody saying a naughty word.
Did you get really angry in high school when you read The Crucible, you know, because they didn't hang more witches?
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Well, guess we know who didn't do the assigned reading in high school.94chem said:PaulsBunions said:94chem said:Ellis Wyatt said:
McCarthy was right.
Can you expound a bit? Here's a question that might help you think a bit. Have you ever said the N-word in your life? Or have you ever associated with someone who has?
False equivalence, communist ideology is not the same as somebody saying a naughty word.
Did you get really angry in high school when you read The Crucible, you know, because they didn't hang more witches?
94chem said:PaulsBunions said:94chem said:Ellis Wyatt said:
McCarthy was right.
Can you expound a bit? Here's a question that might help you think a bit. Have you ever said the N-word in your life? Or have you ever associated with someone who has?
False equivalence, communist ideology is not the same as somebody saying a naughty word.
Did you get really angry in high school when you read The Crucible, you know, because they didn't hang more witches?
Another false equivalence lol
G Martin 87 said:Well, guess we know who didn't do the assigned reading in high school.94chem said:PaulsBunions said:94chem said:Ellis Wyatt said:
McCarthy was right.
Can you expound a bit? Here's a question that might help you think a bit. Have you ever said the N-word in your life? Or have you ever associated with someone who has?
False equivalence, communist ideology is not the same as somebody saying a naughty word.
Did you get really angry in high school when you read The Crucible, you know, because they didn't hang more witches?
I read that stuff for fun. Well, not Faulkner or Melville
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Are they though? They've already released millions of documents.Geminiv said:techno-ag said:It's predominantly Dems though, as usual in stuff like this. When things start looking bad the dual equivocators come out talking about how both sides do it. That's usually our indicator that's it's starting to look really really bad for the Democrats.The Fall Guy said:
Love it or leave it. Supporting pedophiles and defending your party for pedophiles on either aisle will get you a room in hell with Hitler shoving pineapples up your butt for eternity
Are you aware in reality you're just saying that because you want it to be true? Let's say youre accurate. Why is the current administration working so hard to slow and block the release?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
The McCarthy comparison is appropriate; wealthy powerful famous people were involved in Very Bad Things. Innocent lives were ruined too in set because there was much less solid evidence then in the Epstein case.
So now's have another case where wealthy powerful famous people were involved in a Very Bad Thing: trafficking, abusing, possibly even murdering children. Until the full UNREDACTED files are released, no one has been exonerated. Republican, Democrat, CEO, royalty, scientist, academic shine light fully on this evil and punish ALL the guilty parties.
So now's have another case where wealthy powerful famous people were involved in a Very Bad Thing: trafficking, abusing, possibly even murdering children. Until the full UNREDACTED files are released, no one has been exonerated. Republican, Democrat, CEO, royalty, scientist, academic shine light fully on this evil and punish ALL the guilty parties.
Elephant in the room: Epstein was an open Democrat supporter and fundraiser. The fact is that ALL the evidence of sex crimes points to DEMOCRATS AND THEIR DONORS. Clinton, Gates, Prince Andrew…all of them. And the brainwashed liberal media has covered it up.techno-ag said:
Far more Democrats are implicated in the Epstein files.
But you wouldn't know that from the left-wing news coverage.
It is only baffling if he isn't implicated.Wes97 said:
Trump not personally being implicated is different than Trump still covering this **** up on behalf of others. Why he is doing it is baffling. Complete unforced error.
There is a pretty strong probability he is implicated in some way, as are the CIA, Mossad, Ehud Barak, MI6, the Saudis, UAE, and others.
Well I would like to argue with you but……
I feel pretty confident in saying that he isn't implicated on the kiddie porn stuff. But on some of the bigger picture stuff……
I feel pretty confident in saying that he isn't implicated on the kiddie porn stuff. But on some of the bigger picture stuff……
Wes97 said:
Well I would like to argue with you but……
I feel pretty confident in saying that he isn't implicated on the kiddie porn stuff. But on some of the bigger picture stuff……
I agree.
Featured Stories
See All
38:09
10h ago
3.8k
13:40
8h ago
2.2k
Pop Isaacs willing to do whatever it takes in the postseason
by Luke Evangelist
Mr. All-SEC! Forward Rashaun Agee earns third-team nod
by Richard Zane
Baseball Thoughts: Encouragement continues as SEC play arrives
by Ryan Brauninger
11:50
6h ago
809
Marcus Hill loves Texas A&M's 'underdog' story
by Luke Evangelist
jdwAg20/91
Mr. All-SEC! Forward Rashaun Agee earns third-team nod
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
49