How many big fish has the DOJ prosecuted?

CDUB98 said:

---

Gigem314 said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

They are pissed at how poorly the entire Trump Admin has handled the Epstein files/cases.

---

I don't know a single Republican voter that cares about the Epstein files or has the Epstein files anywhere near the top priorities of things that need fixing. It's the new 'Russia Russia Russia' BS. Nothing but a media-driven talking point. The Democrats didn't do a damn thing about the Epstein files, and they wouldn't if they were in power right now. It's nothing but a distraction.

---

You encapsulate the problem.

The Epstein files should not be a right/left issue whatsoever, but you are making it just that.

One of Trump's campaign points was to release the files. Well, then it gets delayed, obfuscated, blown off. The Trump Admin is protecting predators. The Biden Admin before him protected predators. The Obama Admin protected predators.

A lot of people care about this. Pretty sad and pathetic that you don't give two ****s about a global ring of power players being degenerate pedophiles and ephebophiles. It is not a partisan issue, nor a distraction.

But go on and stick your fingers in your ears and just MAGA harder. Just ignore Epstein and the complete ineptitude of Bondi and DOJ about everything.

---

So unless I make it a top issue on my list, I don't care about bad behavior and accept it. What an ignorant take that is clearly driven by pure emotion and not rational thought.

Corruption is everywhere and has existed long before Epstein, and sadly will continue long after he's been gone. Releasing or not releasing the files isn't going to change that. It has been turned into a political football, but not by me.

So save us self-righteous guessing you're making about others on here. You're clueless.

Sound like you're getting emotional.

No, I'm not clueless.

No, you do not have to make it the top of your list. It's not even at the top of my list.

What makes your stance piss poor is that you are completely blowing it off under the guise of, "it's always happened, so who cares."

The Epstein files were a chance to completely blow up the power structure of the Western World and likely return some power the us, the peons.

There's a lot of people that need to burn over Epstein, around the globe. Destroying their power not only brings justice to victims, but allows us to at least have a chance to reset the power back towards the people, and not just our once every couple of years in the primaries which has been ineffective.

But, nah, it's okay. Don't worry about pedophiles.

Tarlov is a disgusting human being.

She is the liberal college educated woman dim stereotype.

SA68AG said:

---

Tarlov is a disgusting human being.

She is the liberal college educated woman dim stereotype.

---

this imagine being married to her, her voice is grading as well.

CDUB98 said:

---

How many big fish has the DOJ prosecuted?

---

Wrong question in my view. How many could they actually prosecute is the more salient question.

Epstein died in 2019. There are many Statute of Limitations issues because of the length of time that has passed. Anyone caught up in his case in 2008 the SOLs have long passed for most crimes.

CDUB98 said:

---

Sound like you're getting emotional.

No, I'm not clueless.

No, you do not have to make it the top of your list. It's not even at the top of my list.

What makes your stance piss poor is that you are completely blowing it off under the guise of, "it's always happened, so who cares."

The Epstein files were a chance to completely blow up the power structure of the Western World and likely return some power the us, the peons.

There's a lot of people that need to burn over Epstein, around the globe. Destroying their power not only brings justice to victims, but allows us to at least have a chance to reset the power back towards the people, and not just our once every couple of years in the primaries which has been ineffective.

But, nah, it's okay. Don't worry about pedophiles.

---

So I'm "emotional" and "don't care about pedophiles" because I simply made the comment that I don't know anyone who has this on the top of their priority list for who they vote for and I don't buy that it would solve very many problems.

And you want to screech at me for having a poor stance?

That's hilarious.

flown-the-coop said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

How many big fish has the DOJ prosecuted?

---

Arrested 6 of the FBI Top 10.

Be more like Jesse and less like Jessica and your life will be happier.

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jesse Watters just DESTROYED Jessica Tarlov’s whiny rant over Kash Patel being at the Team USA hockey game

“He literally just bagged 6 out of the 10 MOST WANTED. Crime is DOWN to levels not seen since 1900! HOW ABOUT A THANK YOU?!”

“He DESERVES a beer!” pic.twitter.com/lavqt18IEK

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) February 23, 2026

---

Answered exactly like I expected.

Those aren't big fish. Those are high profile criminals.

Comey
Schiff
Mayorkis
Swalwell
Garland
Fauci
Wray
Smith

Those are big fish. There's evidence of their treason which has been discussed many times over the years here. I'll at least give them credit that they tried with Comey and Smith.

There is an entire RICO network linked to NGOs and their funding of all kinds illegal activities. DOGE uncovered much it through USAID. Why have we seen ZERO there? The X poster, DataRepublican has basically mapped out the entire network on her own.

I care very little about common criminals compared to those working inside of our own gov't to destroy it. Those are the people many Trump voters wanted to see go down at the very least. I'm sure if I spent more time, I could think of more names.

If you take the attitude that it was just never going to happen, then you've basically handed over the country to the Commies. Since it was never codified into law, USAID and all their slush funds to Dems and criminal network will be right back at it come 2028.

The Dems do political prosecutions of our party leaders when they are in charge but look at these common criminals we put away.

aggiehawg said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

How many big fish has the DOJ prosecuted?

---

Wrong question in my view. How many could they actually prosecute is the more salient question.

Epstein died in 2019. There are many Statute of Limitations issues because of the length of time that has passed. Anyone caught up in his case in 2008 the SOLs have long passed for most crimes.

---

We need to know who in our government is being blackmailed by foreign nations. Statutory rape is a tertiary issue compared to that.

It's not a huge leap to infer the reason they aren't releasing all the files is because it would become clear that almost our entire government is completely compromised. Not because some men had sex with a 17 year old who they thought was of legal age.

Quote:

---

It's not a huge leap to infer the reason they aren't releasing all the files is because it would become clear that almost our entire government is completely compromised.

---

And there are a lot of people who believe it all points back completely to Israel.

I remain a bit skeptical that a tiny country in the Middle East has that much control, but the uncanny way it has of contorting US politicians is concerning.

Quote:

---

We need to know who in our government is being blackmailed by foreign nations. Statutory rape is a tertiary issue compared to that.

It's not a huge leap to infer the reason they aren't releasing all the files is because it would become clear that almost our entire government is completely compromised. Not because some men had sex with a 17 year old who they thought was of legal age.

---

Not a huge leap for you but being able to prove it in a court of law is completely different animal.

I would look into taking a different approach, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. But once again, there is a SOL problem.

Quote:

---

The FCPA has both criminal and civil provisions, each with its own statute of limitations.
For criminal violations of the FCPA, the statute of limitations is generally five years.
Civil violations under the FCPA have a statute of limitations of five years from the date of the violation or two years from the date when the violation was discovered, whichever is later.
The FCPA's statute of limitations can be tolled (paused) under certain circumstances, such as when the defendant is outside the United States or when facts material to the violation are concealed.

---

LINK

I think you misunderstand. I'm not that concerned about prosecutions (related to Epstein). I want the public to know who is controlled by a foreign government.

Knowing who in our government is compromised is far more important than putting people in jail. The jail time would just be lagniappe.

AgNav93 said:

---

Houston Lee said:

---

The dems are desperate and its showing.
-Everything they do is fake outrage
-They are trying to create a crisis out of everything to make it look like Trump and the GOP is failing all over the place.
-Everything Trump says are "lies"
-ICE are murderers and thugs
-The economy isnt good, its worse than last year
-Epstein files, Epstein files, Epstein files!
-They are so desperate that they are going to hold 3 separate rallies in DC that I am sure will be filled with paid attendees/protesters. Nobody will watch these idiots while Trump is speaking. If his speech goes for 3 hours, nobody will stay up to watch the "opposition" speech from the communist Gov of Virginia.

The dems have NO MESSAGE, NO POLICIES, NO PLANS to help the country. Just "Orange Man Bad" rhetoric.

What they are offering is NOTHING.

Sit back and watch these idiots.

---

And it's going to work too. It's worked before and will again. We never learn.

---

I didn't work in 2024

Has Nick Fuentes taken over paying people to post on f16?

Everything points back to Israel, from Nancy Guthrie to Epstein to aliens. Thread after thread is hate Muslims, spurn Israel, the Western power structure must be annihilated, and there is a pedo protector behind every burning bush.

The important part is not to perp walk or lock up folks like Comey, Obama, Rice and the like. I would absolutely love it and would cheer for it. But the MOST important thing is to keep them from getting back in control.

For those clamoring for lawfare and convictions and pointing to what they did to DJT... notice how it did not achieve the ultimate goal.

So let's quit demanding a repeat of lib strategy. Winning will be the key to more winning. So get on and let's continue to do some winning.

Vessel said:

---

I think you misunderstand. I'm not that concerned about prosecutions (related to Epstein). I want the public to know who is controlled by a foreign government.

Knowing who in our government is compromised is far more important than putting people in jail. The jail time would just be lagniappe.

---

Foreign governments that cannot control themselves are controlling the US government? Makes total sense..

Is there a book where I can read these theories?

Do they try and influence? Yes, though many times not as direct as people would think. Do they control? O have a hard time making that leap.

Vessel said:

---

YouBet said:

---

Vessel said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Setting aside historical norms of mid-terms which already point to the House flipping, MANY conservatives are flat out disillusioned because of the lack of prosecution for the last four years of Democrat treason. They are pissed at how poorly the entire Trump Admin has handled the Epstein files/cases. People in general are pissed at the thought of yet another sandbox war, this time with Iran. Hardcore voters, like most of us here, will get out there and vote, but there is a great deal of apathy for Republicans right now, and it's their own making.

---

Well said. I'll add no border wall, no mass deportations, no legal immigration restrictions, and no insurrection act against anti-ICE communists.

The administration continuously proves it is unserious about delivering major political wins which demoralize the left and secure America's future.

---

While there is obvcoiusly truth to this, I believe a flip at the mid-terms has happened every cycle but two of them. Based on that, the odds are that even if they had done much of this there is still a good chance people still switch their vote.

---

Correct. That's why he had to get that stuff done before the midterms. Now they are moderating on everything to try to win the midterms, will lose anyways, then their agenda will be completely obstructed.

The administration had one year to enact great change and they failed miserably.

---

If Blame is going to be doled out, about 95% of it should be tagged onto Senate Republicans.

Though thats from my viewpoint. I'm willing to listen to details regarding other obstructions and obstructionists.

Quote:

---

If Blame is going to be doled out, about 95% of it should be tagged onto Senate Republicans.

---

You'll get no argument from me here.

Quote:

---

Not a huge leap for you but being able to prove it in a court of law is completely different animal.

---

The lawyer gets it! Face it, there has been "evidence" of everything from cannibalism to bodies buried on golf courses, but #$&@ evidence ->#$&@ cases.

Rep. Maxine Dexter (D) thinks that putting "whole milk" in public schools is "White supremacy."

No, this is not a joke.

Democrats are now calling milk "rAcIsT"pic.twitter.com/1eu0WyGCZ6

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 25, 2026

Soo, we need more brown cows that give chocolate milk? is that her takeaway here? White milk is racist?

LOL. Talk about dumb.

aggiehawg said:

---

Rep. Maxine Dexter (D) thinks that putting "whole milk" in public schools is "White supremacy."

No, this is not a joke.

Democrats are now calling milk "rAcIsT"pic.twitter.com/1eu0WyGCZ6

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 25, 2026

Soo, we need more brown cows that give chocolate milk? is that her takeaway here? White milk is racist?

LOL. Talk about dumb.

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Sound like you're getting emotional.

No, I'm not clueless.

No, you do not have to make it the top of your list. It's not even at the top of my list.

What makes your stance piss poor is that you are completely blowing it off under the guise of, "it's always happened, so who cares."

The Epstein files were a chance to completely blow up the power structure of the Western World and likely return some power the us, the peons.

There's a lot of people that need to burn over Epstein, around the globe. Destroying their power not only brings justice to victims, but allows us to at least have a chance to reset the power back towards the people, and not just our once every couple of years in the primaries which has been ineffective.

But, nah, it's okay. Don't worry about pedophiles.

---

This is a ridiculous take. The Epstein files provide some opportunity to investigate and arrest/convict people for sexual crimes against young people. But it absolutely has no power to reverse the power that enumerable elite globalists have over US, Middle East and Europe foreign policy.

No matter how stupid the Dems sound or act will not impact the average voter.

This is going to come down to turnout, whosoever base turns out the most will win.

If Virginia get approval on their redrawing of districts, the house is toast for Rs.

It is amazing to me that Rs could have flipped at least 15~20 seats by redrawing districts but none of the R states redrew except for Texas. Because Rs are weak AF and do not act when needed. Indiana is a good example, their state voted down redistricting, when they could have added 2 seats to Rs

Now Dems could flip 8 seats between Cali and Virginia to only 4 from Rs (Texas)

Trump tries to teach Rs how to win and fight fire with fire but no, Rs would rather mess around and do nothing

Pathetic

Quote:

---

It is amazing to me that Rs could have flipped at least 15~20 seats by redrawing districts but none of the R states redrew except for Texas. Because Rs are weak AF and do not act when needed. Indiana is a good example, their state voted down redistricting, when they could have added 2 seats to Rs

Now Dems could flip 8 seats between Cali and Virginia to only 4 from Rs (Texas)

---

Part of that blame falls squarely under POTUS. They are withholding the Voting Rights Act case. It was heard last term, then nothing. Rescheduled more argument this term and still nothing.

I know C.J. Roberts says he is concerned that the Court not be viewed as being political but by stalling on that case, they are deliberately affecting elections.

WestAustinAg said:

---

CDUB98 said:

---

Sound like you're getting emotional.

No, I'm not clueless.

No, you do not have to make it the top of your list. It's not even at the top of my list.

What makes your stance piss poor is that you are completely blowing it off under the guise of, "it's always happened, so who cares."

The Epstein files were a chance to completely blow up the power structure of the Western World and likely return some power the us, the peons.

There's a lot of people that need to burn over Epstein, around the globe. Destroying their power not only brings justice to victims, but allows us to at least have a chance to reset the power back towards the people, and not just our once every couple of years in the primaries which has been ineffective.

But, nah, it's okay. Don't worry about pedophiles.

---

This is a ridiculous take. The Epstein files provide some opportunity to investigate and arrest/convict people for sexual crimes against young people. But it absolutely has no power to reverse the power that enumerable elite globalists have over US, Middle East and Europe foreign policy.

---

Do they though?

You have inside knowledge from BOTH parties that proves that smoking guns exist?

I don't see how some of you here are just blindly assuming that the Dems will take the house. You really fail to understand how things are completely different this next midterm.

#1 - Elon Musk bought Twitter. This alone is a huge equalizer about how the Dems "used" to control the media narrative. The Dems dont control the narrative anymore. It's a HUGE difference. People see how the Dems are just plain crazy.

#2- The Dems have no message. They dont have a plan and they stand for nothing. They are mixed bag of misfit toys with purple hair and fake eyelashes. Their party is a joke and rudderless.

#3- The economy is getting better. By the time Oct 2026 rolls around we will be looking better than we are even today.

#4- The Dems are broke. They dont have USAID to help pay for their crap like buying people to go to a "protest". And we all know that the protesters are not grassroots. The secret is out. Everyone knows. Everyone.

This is why the Dems are desperate and grasping at ANYTHING they can to look like they are "pushing back". But they are on the wrong end of EVERY 80/20 issue. They have no plan and are not offering anything worth voting for. Most of them were scared to stand up and clap last night SOTU because they are afraid their crazy base will dethrone them in the primaries if they don't "appear" to be fighting Orange Man Bad. They are in shambles.

So yes. Sit back and watch. It's going to be beautiful. But, go ahead and keep thinking the Dems will take back the House. That loser mentality wont matter.