agent-maroon said:

---

Quote:

---

California's elderly parole law expanded by AB 3234 to include inmates over 50 after 20 years served.

---

When did age 50 become "elderly"? He's 64. Hasn't even reached the age of full retirement if he was an ordinary shmo out working for a living and he's going to be released because he's "elderly"?

California sucks...

---

Believe it or not the original Elderly parole law passed in 2018 and signed by Newsome was "over 60" they revised it in 2020 and lowered it to "over 50" again signed into law by Newsome. He has veto powers but didn't use them. This is as much on him as anyone. As I posted in my OP, Newsome has the power to intervene in this Parole being granted, and reverse the boards decision, but he has failed to do that as well.

100# will repeat.

Anubus said:

---

She was warned by fellow hitchhikers to not get in the van with that guy. She chose not to listen.

---

When Dad of the year nomination goes wrong.

Liberals love pedophiles. No other way to explain it

The "pedo protector" is just projection, like everything else.

I thought CA gen pop were supposed to whack this guy, as they hate CHOMOs and such. They're soft.

Republican OPPO research, save this nugget for 2028.

What is incredible is that he received only 14 years.

How did he survive prison??

Got a Natty! said:

---

What is incredible is that he received only 14 years.

---

For real. How can you do all of that and only get 14 years, serving 8? He did 4 years for each arm he chopped off… the math does not check out.

Somebody along with their good buddies Smith and Wesson needs to be waiting for this guy the minute he passes outside those prison walls. Evil.

Harry Stone said:

---

Liberals are okay with pedophiles. Really dont understand how anyone is ok with it, but thats a lib for you

---

Oh boy. Don't click the epstein thread. It will upset you.

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

---

🚨 Sacramento Sheriff’s Office is blasting California’s elderly parole program after a convicted serial child abuser was granted release.

A judge once called David Funston “the monster parents fear the most.”

pic.twitter.com/XByaZXBZnU

— 𝕽 𝕾 𝕬𝖓𝖆𝖓𝖉🦅🇺🇸 (@rsanandin) February 24, 2026

---

"What the hell is going on in California?" Take a seat buddy, I have a long story to tell you. Maybe somebody, somewhere in that Godforsaken place will make a stand. Bless this guy for speaking out.

Newsome, the presumed front runner for the Dem nomination, is literally letting pedophiles and rapists out of jail early instead of having them serve life sentences. More stock into this than some stuff the NPR made up about Trump in the Epstein files.

Harry Stone said:

---

Liberals are okay with pedophiles. Really dont understand how anyone is ok with it, but thats a lib for you

---

Maybe he's a future presidential candidate?
Could be a running mate with Newsom. I mean there's gotta be a pedo on the dem ballot right?
Higher IQ than Biden, and same tendencies. Plus he's white. Checks all the boxes and more than Biden did.

Kashchei said:

---

Somebody along with their good buddies Smith and Wesson needs to be waiting for this guy the minute he passes outside those prison walls. Evil.

---

Harry Stone said:

---

Liberals are okay with pedophiles. Really dont understand how anyone is ok with it, but thats a lib for you

---

They're not just okay with it. He'll be in Congress next year with all his fellow Dem pedos.

Urban Ag said:

---

Trump is 100% right


These people are f'ing crazy

---

I think they tapped the brakes and added new charges. Newsome will do anything to win.

A child molester serving 3 life sentences was just granted parole and Newsom is denying responsibility. But he signed the early release law and it's his parole board letting the man out.

The "monster parents fear most," as the judge called him, could now be back on our streets. pic.twitter.com/eOWoMgEOCD

— Rep. Kevin Kiley (@RepKiley) February 26, 2026

Shackle him to Greasy Newsome and seehow long ol Greasy lasts.

boulderaggie said:

---

I think they tapped the brakes and added new charges. Newsome will do anything to win.

---

Those worst of the offenders released should be required to live for a year with the families of the lawmakers who voted for this or the members of the parole board who let them out. If they make it through the year without another offense, then maybe they go free from there.

BBRex said:

---

Those worst of the offenders released should be required to live for a year with the families of the lawmakers who voted for this or the members of the parole board who let them out. If they make it through the year without another offense, then maybe they go free from there.

---

If they repeat the Paul's board should have 2x punishment for the crime. I'd also allow vigilante justice by the victim on those whose hand was on the release.

If I was one of those kids parents, I don't know that he'd live to see another week.

Here's what's still puzzling

Quote:

---

In 1999, David Allen Funston was sentenced to three consecutive terms of 25 years to life, plus an additional prison term of 20 years and eight months.

https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/convicted-sacramento-child-molester-david-funston-new-charges-placer/

---

That means by the letter of this elderly law, he's served 20 years on the FIRST life sentence, he still owes 20 on the SECOND life sentence and another 20 on the THIRD life sentence. then he can work on the 20 year 8 month sentence.

According to the laws of the state or California, consecutive life sentences are served one after the other, meaning the minimum parole eligibility period for each sentence must be completed sequentially. This structure ensures that even if parole is granted for one count, the inmate immediately begins serving the next, effectively creating a life-without-parole scenario. Same goes for three consecutive, and then he starts the 20+.

None of this makes sense

Newsom is too busy cosplaying as a soul brutha to care about the ramifications of his policies on innocent children and their families.

Anubus said:

---

She was warned by fellow hitchhikers to not get in the van with that guy. She chose not to listen.

---

Wow. So, you're saying she had it coming? I didn't think they made people like you anymore. IT's like finding a VCR at a garage sale.

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

---

Here's what's still puzzling

Quote:

---

In 1999, David Allen Funston was sentenced to three consecutive terms of 25 years to life, plus an additional prison term of 20 years and eight months.

https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/convicted-sacramento-child-molester-david-funston-new-charges-placer/

---

That means by the letter of this elderly law, he's served 20 years on the FIRST life sentence, he still owes 20 on the SECOND life sentence and another 20 on the THIRD life sentence. then he can work on the 20 year 8 month sentence.

According to the laws of the state or California, consecutive life sentences are served one after the other, meaning the minimum parole eligibility period for each sentence must be completed sequentially. This structure ensures that even if parole is granted for one count, the inmate immediately begins serving the next, effectively creating a life-without-parole scenario. Same goes for three consecutive, and then he starts the 20+.

None of this makes sense

---

That was my interpretation too. If we are wrong, in California, I would hold out one charge on one victim for cases like this that the math would work out for a parole. Arrest him at release and try him on this one victim.

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

---

Here's what's still puzzling

Quote:

---

In 1999, David Allen Funston was sentenced to three consecutive terms of 25 years to life, plus an additional prison term of 20 years and eight months.

https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/convicted-sacramento-child-molester-david-funston-new-charges-placer/

---

That means by the letter of this elderly law, he's served 20 years on the FIRST life sentence, he still owes 20 on the SECOND life sentence and another 20 on the THIRD life sentence. then he can work on the 20 year 8 month sentence.

According to the laws of the state or California, consecutive life sentences are served one after the other, meaning the minimum parole eligibility period for each sentence must be completed sequentially. This structure ensures that even if parole is granted for one count, the inmate immediately begins serving the next, effectively creating a life-without-parole scenario. Same goes for three consecutive, and then he starts the 20+.

None of this makes sense

---

What you say certainly makes sense. But without reading the crazy law that Newsome signed I don't know if you are right.

This is another example of how the elected people in California can screw up a state that has every natural resource and a great location that should make it the state with the most dominant economy in our country. But instead people and businesses are fleeing like rats on a sinking ship.

Apparently that is what is happening with the most recent state charge being filed.

Wild that this guy wasn't merked in prison