Trump Confirms New Massive PEOC Under East Wing

5,797 Views | 52 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by bobbranco
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He sort of let this slip in the Cabinet meeting this week (or one of his gaggles) but evidently there had been a lawsuit filed East Wing construction that revealed the military involvement and the NYT pushed out an article.

NYT article. I am not giving them clicks or email address but I am sure it's another Pulitzer in the making. Just look at how unbiased the headline is!

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/29/upshot/white-house-ballroom.html




Trump is not happy with NYT. Sorry if already posted and believe many of us would have assumed this was part of the plan, but Trump confirmed aboard AF1 over the weekend.


Skip to end for the brief military mention:


MyNameIsJeff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Am I supposed to know what a PEOC is?

Nvm, googled it.
Flying Crowbar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PEOC?
redcrayon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Presidential Emergency Operations Center
flashplayer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) is a secure, hardened underground bunker located beneath the White House East Wing

Literally Hitler bunker!!!
[/libs]
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MyNameIsJeff said:

Am I supposed to know what a PEOC is?

Nvm, googled it.

It's been in enough movies that I thought it was well known.

But yes, the not so secret Presidential Emergency Operation Center. The old one was under the old East Wing so it would have been odd NOT to have this as part of the remodel.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of all the reasons to hold the NYT with the utmost contempt possible, this one is pretty far down the list, imho.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's mad that the military involvement came out because the NYT or affiliate sued over the design, resulting in a court related disclosure.

I don't think he gives ****s about the design criticism.
dvldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watch Olympus Has Fallen for what I'm sure is a 100% accurate portrayal of the PEOC
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why does the design need to be scrutinized? It looks to be in line with everything else design wise.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Why does the design need to be scrutinized? It looks to be in line with everything else design wise.

Because it involves Trump.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dvldog said:

Watch Olympus Has Fallen for what I'm sure is a 100% accurate portrayal of the PEOC

seemed legit to me. The secret service performance during the takeover seems about the right level of competence. Just sayin…
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So the NYT thinks the new ballroom hasn't been scrutinized enough…but when they found cocaine in the White House under Biden they didn't see what the big deal was. Sounds about right.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

So the NYT thinks the new ballroom hasn't been scrutinized enough…but when the found cocaine in the White House under Biden they didn't see that the big deal was. Sounds about right.


Excellent point.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As if the White House did not already have a huge target painted on it.
2026NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks nice. Pretty cool he raised the funds to not cost the taxpayer. I am sure the military section was paid for by the military budget, that is probably expensive but needed
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

He sort of let this slip in the Cabinet meeting this week (or one of his gaggles) but evidently there had been a lawsuit filed East Wing construction that revealed the military involvement and the NYT pushed out an article.

NYT article. I am not giving them clicks or email address but I am sure it's another Pulitzer in the making. Just look at how unbiased the headline is!

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/29/upshot/white-house-ballroom.html




Trump is not happy with NYT. Sorry if already posted and believe many of us would have assumed this was part of the plan, but Trump confirmed aboard AF1 over the weekend.


Skip to end for the brief military mention:



https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-claims-military-very-much-164647537.html
quote from the article
-Now it's no secret the military wanted it more than anybody," Trump said at the meeting. "It was supposed to be secret, but it became unsecret because of people that are really unpatriotic saying things

Joe Kent?
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NYT front page: five articles per day on how Trump is destroying the universe.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JD and Tulsi will still have to stay in the old situation room under the West Wing.
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just hide it in the laundry room like Gus Fring
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope it's bunkerbuster-proof.
I don't think you know me.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The new East Wing Ballroon is larger than the West Wing, so it will look funny. But, that will just give some future president the excuse needed to enlarge the West Wing.

The White House has constantly changed over the years. Having the exterior look go unchanged for as long as it has recently is not the norm.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As Vanity Fair pointed out a long time ago, he's got small hands....no WAY his PEOC is that big.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
POTUS PeePee Prominence is a matter of national security and should not be discussed in pubic forums.
jtkk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Want to know who else had an underground bunker?
Hitler!
Gunny456
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure in your head you thought that would be funny no?
TAMU Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences

Boat racing is like a beautiful woman.......expensive, high maintenance, but well worth the fun!
jtkk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gunny456 said:

I'm sure in your head you thought that would be funny no?

Yeah I did. It's Monday.
FarmerJohn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Why does the design need to be scrutinized? It looks to be in line with everything else design wise.

Because all great architecture is done by committee.
EFR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag said:

flown-the-coop said:

He sort of let this slip in the Cabinet meeting this week (or one of his gaggles) but evidently there had been a lawsuit filed East Wing construction that revealed the military involvement and the NYT pushed out an article.

NYT article. I am not giving them clicks or email address but I am sure it's another Pulitzer in the making. Just look at how unbiased the headline is!

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/29/upshot/white-house-ballroom.html




Trump is not happy with NYT. Sorry if already posted and believe many of us would have assumed this was part of the plan, but Trump confirmed aboard AF1 over the weekend.


Skip to end for the brief military mention:



https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-claims-military-very-much-164647537.html
quote from the article
-Now it's no secret the military wanted it more than anybody," Trump said at the meeting. "It was supposed to be secret, but it became unsecret because of people that are really unpatriotic saying things

Joe Kent?

Yep, those unpatriotic people asking about where their tax dollars are going and what is happening to the buildings that belong to the people.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure every Dem President in the future would never use it under any circumstances.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mean, you know the ballroom is paid for completely through donations, right?

The military complex seems like a good opportunity to upgrade a 60 year old facility designed for Soviet nukes.

You can hate on it. But it's hard to call it a waste of money.

At least when Trump spends taxpayer dollars we get something for it.
chap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EFR said:

richardag said:

flown-the-coop said:

He sort of let this slip in the Cabinet meeting this week (or one of his gaggles) but evidently there had been a lawsuit filed East Wing construction that revealed the military involvement and the NYT pushed out an article.

NYT article. I am not giving them clicks or email address but I am sure it's another Pulitzer in the making. Just look at how unbiased the headline is!

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/29/upshot/white-house-ballroom.html




Trump is not happy with NYT. Sorry if already posted and believe many of us would have assumed this was part of the plan, but Trump confirmed aboard AF1 over the weekend.


Skip to end for the brief military mention:



https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-claims-military-very-much-164647537.html
quote from the article
-Now it's no secret the military wanted it more than anybody," Trump said at the meeting. "It was supposed to be secret, but it became unsecret because of people that are really unpatriotic saying things

Joe Kent?

Yep, those unpatriotic people asking about where their tax dollars are going and what is happening to the buildings that belong to the people.


Holy crap. This certainly hasn't been your best day.
87IE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chap said:

EFR said:

richardag said:

flown-the-coop said:

He sort of let this slip in the Cabinet meeting this week (or one of his gaggles) but evidently there had been a lawsuit filed East Wing construction that revealed the military involvement and the NYT pushed out an article.

NYT article. I am not giving them clicks or email address but I am sure it's another Pulitzer in the making. Just look at how unbiased the headline is!

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/29/upshot/white-house-ballroom.html




Trump is not happy with NYT. Sorry if already posted and believe many of us would have assumed this was part of the plan, but Trump confirmed aboard AF1 over the weekend.


Skip to end for the brief military mention:



https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-claims-military-very-much-164647537.html
quote from the article
-Now it's no secret the military wanted it more than anybody," Trump said at the meeting. "It was supposed to be secret, but it became unsecret because of people that are really unpatriotic saying things

Joe Kent?

Yep, those unpatriotic people asking about where their tax dollars are going and what is happening to the buildings that belong to the people.


Holy crap. This certainly hasn't been your best day.

He's
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I keep reading the Yahoo comments on the articles related to this and laughing. So many leftists think that:
A) Trump has let our enemies know that there is a bunker under the White House for the first time ever.
and
B) This suddenly turns the White House into a valid military target, because they had zero reason to attack the U.S. Commander in Chief's residence before now.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Reeeeeeeeeeeeee"?
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.