The UK Is Having An Absolute Day

15,908 Views | 104 Replies | Last: 21 days ago by KentK93
heavens11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DCPD158 said:

UK is part of NATO, the Falklands are part of the UK. An attack on the UK is an attack on NATO? Did I do that right?

I don't believe there has been an attack
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can't wait for this weeks SNL UK.

“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

To be fair to him, the state of their Navy has been a 30+ years slow burn down. No PM is going to fix that in a couple years.

But he is not even trying.

He'll absolutely stop the evil US from misgendering or from taking Greenland, though.
DCPD158
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
heavens11 said:

DCPD158 said:

UK is part of NATO, the Falklands are part of the UK. An attack on the UK is an attack on NATO? Did I do that right?

I don't believe there has been an attack

Never said there was, nor did anyone else in the thread, so of course, it is an implied, if...
Company I-1, Ord-Ords '85 -12thFan and Websider-
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The UK ceased to be a great power in 1956. Their empire ended on 1 July 1997.

Today, if they didn't have nuclear weapons, they'd be a 4th rate power at best.

Same for Russia and same for France. Having nukes is the only reason they have any clout left.
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

File this under when UK had a proper Navy:

Quote:

Case in point: Working in Copenhagen harbor, marine archaeologists have discovered the wreck of the Dannebroge, a Danish man-of-war that was sunk over 200 years ago by ships of the British Royal Navy. The Dannebroge was sunk during the Battle of Copenhagen in 1801, and here's the really cool thing: This ship was the primary target of the Royal Navy, and it's a near-certainty that Lord Horatio Nelson himself laid eyes - well, eye - on the ship before it went down.



https://redstate.com/wardclark/2026/04/08/nelsons-victory-unearthed-danish-warship-dannebrog-found-after-225-years-in-copenhagen-harbor-n2201101
“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Good video. Goes back to several of us early on stating that all of this is tied together: VZ, Cuba, Iran, Russia, China.

It's all connected and mostly deliberate. Obviously, all plans get punched in the mouth and unforeseen things happen, but people need to pull up and look at this at a more strategic level.

Most of us see it.
There are others that see it, understand it, and can't stand the fact that the man they hate the most, is going to reshape the world in Americas favor, for Americas success
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Man this article is full of rips on Starmer.

https://hotair.com/tree-hugging-sister/2026/04/08/starmers-deserted-islands-britain-despises-him-chagos-blows-up-and-now-argentina-wants-the-falklands-n3813699

Here is my favorite:




“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poor little Communist feels left out
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lord Nelson was truly one of the baddest men to ever live
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KentK93 said:


File this under when UK had a proper Navy:

Quote:

Case in point: Working in Copenhagen harbor, marine archaeologists have discovered the wreck of the Dannebroge, a Danish man-of-war that was sunk over 200 years ago by ships of the British Royal Navy. The Dannebroge was sunk during the Battle of Copenhagen in 1801, and here's the really cool thing: This ship was the primary target of the Royal Navy, and it's a near-certainty that Lord Horatio Nelson himself laid eyes - well, eye - on the ship before it went down.



https://redstate.com/wardclark/2026/04/08/nelsons-victory-unearthed-danish-warship-dannebrog-found-after-225-years-in-copenhagen-harbor-n2201101


Reading this brought all of my rage back that we never got the Master & Commander series of movies that we so rightly deserved.
BarnacleBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ts5641 said:

Not much they can do. Their military is but a shadow of what it once was and the leftists in that country wouldn't support it nor would their Chamberlain-esque leader.

Comparing Starmer to Chamberlain is an insult to Chamberlain.

Although he was wrong, pre-war Chamberlain was pursuing the course of action that he sincerely believed to be the best way to keep Britain out of another global war and ensure its security.

Starmer is deliberately destroying the UK both domestically and abroad. He is of course merely the front man for a British ruling class hell bent on "managed decline", but he is the one doing it.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BaileyAg said:

It's fascinating to watch their fall real-time while wondering where all the real men are over there.
Someone should be fomenting something big

GB downfall began with the massive loss of males during WW1. If you were a male between 20-35 in 1920 you were either dead, wounded and/or had massive PTSD.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agracer said:

BaileyAg said:

It's fascinating to watch their fall real-time while wondering where all the real men are over there.
Someone should be fomenting something big

GB downfall began with the massive loss of males during WW1. If you were a male between 20-35 in 1920 you were either dead, wounded and/or had massive PTSD.

100%

That was something Dr. Krammer taught in his WWII classes at A&M.

Europe slaughtered an entire generation of their best, brightest, strongest, and healthiest men on the battlefields of WWI. Then they did it again to a lesser extent in WWII.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

BaileyAg said:

It's fascinating to watch their fall real-time while wondering where all the real men are over there.
Someone should be fomenting something big

GB downfall began with the massive loss of males during WW1. If you were a male between 20-35 in 1920 you were either dead, wounded and/or had massive PTSD.

And yet they took back the Falklands in 1982, despite losing HMS Sheffield early on, and with only 2 small aircraft carriers (Hermes from WWII) and HMS Invincible.

Its amazing what strong leadership and a competent military can do.
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Man UK is so weak under Sir Keir:

Hiding behind international law:
Quote:

Now it can be revealed that Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, has given legal advice about how the ships could be tackled in British territorial waters to prevent the flow of sanctioned oil to Russia's allies.
Under his advice, ships can be boarded by special forces and officers from the National Crime Agency (NCA), but no such operations have taken place because of concerns about breaching international maritime law, which sets a high legal bar for a state to board a foreign vessel.




Quote:

On Thursday, Boris Johnson, the former prime minister, told The Telegraph that Sir Keir had to stop the shadow fleet and recover "some of the respect Britain has lost recently" over its military response to the war in the Middle East.
He said: "I think it's pathetic. I don't know why we don't board these sanction-busting ships. They are fuelling Putin's war machine and funding his slaughter of innocent Ukrainians and we have a golden opportunity to stop it.


Free Telegraph article on why UK Navy can't take dark fleet ships:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/e8e58ed0f79ce64c

“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Re: Falklands, it's a relic of the British empire. HOWEVER in the Falklands aka Malvinas war the overwhelming majority of residents of the "disputed" islands considered themselves British and were happy to be British subjects / citizens.

If that is no longer the case, and I have no idea either way, they should have a referendum and if they vote their own form of Brexit then Westminster should negotiate a peaceful and legal transfer to Argentina.

IF they care about the people at all, if it is driven by access to resources they may not GAF and will keep telling Argentina to pound sand until it goes hot.

I feel certain Trump as POTUS would support Argentina, and can see a Dem POTUS doing so as well.

BTW, highly recommend a trip to Argentina, Buenos Aires, Mendoza, Bariloche, and Patagonia, all fantastic and the Argentines are great people. It's also very interesting how they speak Spanish with an Italian accent, have French architecture in BA, and many English customs…. and very nice women folk. I have traveled all over Europe (and Asia) and Argentina is BY FAR the best trip I have ever been to.
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
having lived in Argentina for several years, as far as i remember reading the residents themselves are still not asking to be Argentinean. and i don't blame them, i would argue that would make their lives materially worse, to be honest. a ****ty currency, overwhelming bureaucracy, economic inflation destroying your income, etc.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It just keeps getting worse:

Telegraph (paywall)

Quote:

This week an investigation by The Spectator found that Universal Credit (UC) recipients were receiving massive discounts to visit tourist attractions apparently funded by those of us who are required to pay the full fee.

A family of four would normally pay 111 to visit the Tower of London. However, families receiving UC (or certain other benefits) can get a 107 discount, reducing the total cost to just 4. The same support extends to food, with the Tower's caf offering discounted meals such as fish and chips at half price compared to the usual 16.95. Similar schemes are available across many of London's major attractions. It casts the idea of a "leisure class" in an entirely new light.

What we have, in reality, is a topsy-turvy Britain where the strivers are subsidising the skivers. And before any Lefty mentions it yes, I know 33 per cent of people on Universal Credit are in employment. But millions more aren't.

Let me be clear, as Starmer might say. I am not for a minute suggesting that people on benefits shouldn't be able to do whatever they want with their spare time. But since the taxpayer is already paying them not to work, why on earth are we subsidising their leisure pursuits on top? What next, workers paying the Netflix subscriptions of non-workers? Why not pay directly for their supermarket shopping while we're at it? It's getting completely out of control.

laavispa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Re: Falklands, it's a relic of the British empire. HOWEVER in the Falklands aka Malvinas war the overwhelming majority of residents of the "disputed" islands considered themselves British and were happy to be British subjects / citizens.

The real prize is not a few 'subjects' or an overwhelming sheep population. Rather it is the North Falkland Basin with an estimated reserve of 800 million bbls of OIL. GB was hard pressed to prevail in the '80s war and as demonstrated recently they can't even get one ship into the Med.
--------------
Nobody with open eyes can any longer doubt that the danger to personal freedom comes chiefly from the left. F. A. Hayek



KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Man the the Royal Navy is outsourced jobs to the RFA:
Quote:

Sailors tracking Russian warships through the Channel are to go on strike next week.
Personnel from the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA), the civilian support wing of the Royal Navy, are set to walk out on Thursday in a long-running row over pay.
The Telegraph revealed on Wednesday that seafarers on RFA Tideforce, a 39,000-ton tanker, were deployed to follow a heavily armed Russian frigate off the south coast instead of a British warship.
Union bosses have warned that staff have endured years of substandard wages while the demands facing crews continue to increase.
Pressures on the Navy have led to the RFA filling some gaps left by a lack of available vessels to track Vladimir Putin's warships as they menace the UK's coastline.
It is unclear whether the walkout will affect Britain's ability to shadow Russian warships if Putin sends more through the Channel.
Before next week's industrial action, Eddie Dempsey, the general secretary of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT), warned that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) needed to offer more than a 4.5 per cent pay rise if it wanted to avoid civilian staff quitting the Armed Forces.



Free article from Telegraph
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/6c81d316ff45e17a
“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twk said:

It just keeps getting worse:

Telegraph (paywall)

Quote:

This week an investigation by The Spectator found that Universal Credit (UC) recipients were receiving massive discounts to visit tourist attractions apparently funded by those of us who are required to pay the full fee.

A family of four would normally pay 111 to visit the Tower of London. However, families receiving UC (or certain other benefits) can get a 107 discount, reducing the total cost to just 4. The same support extends to food, with the Tower's caf offering discounted meals such as fish and chips at half price compared to the usual 16.95. Similar schemes are available across many of London's major attractions. It casts the idea of a "leisure class" in an entirely new light.

What we have, in reality, is a topsy-turvy Britain where the strivers are subsidising the skivers. And before any Lefty mentions it yes, I know 33 per cent of people on Universal Credit are in employment. But millions more aren't.

Let me be clear, as Starmer might say. I am not for a minute suggesting that people on benefits shouldn't be able to do whatever they want with their spare time. But since the taxpayer is already paying them not to work, why on earth are we subsidising their leisure pursuits on top? What next, workers paying the Netflix subscriptions of non-workers? Why not pay directly for their supermarket shopping while we're at it? It's getting completely out of control.



Free link to the Telegraph article: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/7f69bc5bd70847b5

“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Starmer loses again!

KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Britain is just crazy at this time:

Quote:

Displaying the flag is now treated as a hate crime, because it can make certain peopleyou know whofeel nervous or something. It doesn't matter that nobody fears the English flag, really. The real fear is that the Islamists will start a riot, because they are savages who want to conquer the UK.

More information:

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2026/04/10/britains-suicide-continues-n3813774
“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is sad but funny because it basically means England is back to fighting wars like in earlier centuries. When kings would run out of money, they would call a truce, negotiate a settlement of conquered land and captured nobles at the time, and call it a day. Then do it all over again when they got more money.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Uh oh. Looks like Keir now has an Epstein scandal on his hands.

Quote:

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday he unintentionally misled lawmakers by claiming that his pick for ambassador to Washington, Peter Mandelson, had full security clearance, as his government grapples with a new crisis tied to Jeffrey Epstein.

The debacle has quickly morphed into a full-blown scandal, with Starmer facing calls from all the opposition parties to quit. Several opposition lawmakers said he had intentionally lied to Parliament, which is considered a resigning offense in the U.K. On Monday, Starmer denied this but accepted he should never have appointed Mandelson to the role.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Uh oh. Looks like Keir now has an Epstein scandal on his hands.

Quote:

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday he unintentionally misled lawmakers by claiming that his pick for ambassador to Washington, Peter Mandelson, had full security clearance, as his government grapples with a new crisis tied to Jeffrey Epstein.

The debacle has quickly morphed into a full-blown scandal, with Starmer facing calls from all the opposition parties to quit. Several opposition lawmakers said he had intentionally lied to Parliament, which is considered a resigning offense in the U.K. On Monday, Starmer denied this but accepted he should never have appointed Mandelson to the role.



When that hypocrite was leader of the opposition, he repeatedly called for ministers to resign for unintentionally misleading parliament as a "breach of the ministerial code." Now, it's someone else's fault, and no reason for him to resign. They call him "Two Tier Kier" for a reason.
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now UK is losing their best troops:

Quote:

Several sources have claimed that soldiers from 22 SAS, the Army'smost elite fighting force, have applied for premature voluntary release.
The Telegraph is withholding the exact figure for security reasons, but at least two squadrons, D and G, are believed to have been affected. Several SAS sources described the losses as significant and a "threat to national security".
Insiders say the resignations have been driven by outrage over recent war crime investigations into Afghanistan and Syria, which have been described as "witch hunts".


The why:

Quote:

The treatment of elderly Northern Ireland veterans who served in the SAS has also contributed, insiders say. They are viewed as having been hounded through the courts on vexatious claims, some of which have been described as "ludicrous" by a judge.
Among those understood to have resigned are several senior warrant officers, who are the backbone of the special forces and among the most experienced troops in the regiment. A number are understood to have applied for release "on principle" just before Christmas.
"Morale is s--- at the moment," one insider with knowledge of the recent losses said, while another said there was "considerable disquiet" in the regiment as a result.


Read the rest here free link to the story:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/4e8656b2e4efe188
“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KentK93 said:

Now UK is losing their best troops:

Quote:

Several sources have claimed that soldiers from 22 SAS, the Army'smost elite fighting force, have applied for premature voluntary release.
The Telegraph is withholding the exact figure for security reasons, but at least two squadrons, D and G, are believed to have been affected. Several SAS sources described the losses as significant and a "threat to national security".
Insiders say the resignations have been driven by outrage over recent war crime investigations into Afghanistan and Syria, which have been described as "witch hunts".


The why:

Quote:

The treatment of elderly Northern Ireland veterans who served in the SAS has also contributed, insiders say. They are viewed as having been hounded through the courts on vexatious claims, some of which have been described as "ludicrous" by a judge.
Among those understood to have resigned are several senior warrant officers, who are the backbone of the special forces and among the most experienced troops in the regiment. A number are understood to have applied for release "on principle" just before Christmas.
"Morale is s--- at the moment," one insider with knowledge of the recent losses said, while another said there was "considerable disquiet" in the regiment as a result.


Read the rest here free link to the story:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/4e8656b2e4efe188



Quote:

The Army has shrunk from more than 100,000 around 2010 to just over 70,000 fully trained soldiers now, its smallest since before the Napoleonic War.
The Navy, once the jewel of Britain's military, is now at its smallest size in living memory, with only seven frigates and six destroyers in the fleet and two aircraft carriers. Of the six Astute-class nuclear attack submarines, only one is at sea.
One of Britain's Vanguard boats, armed with nuclear missiles, spent more than six months underwater, a far longer deployment than previously carried out by the nuclear deterrence force.


Remember when Britannia ruled the waves?
Leftists destroying their country is a tale as old as time.
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the SAS units are depleted-- do what liberals here in USA always do, lower the standards, hit the streets for bodies and sign them up! Problem solved!
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Man this video brings the receipts on taxes, youth unemployment, productivity, youth mental health issues, education issues. Now I understand why UK would be 51st state behind Mississippi. Then there his take down of Net Zero policies is best.

“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did I hear Cruz correctly on yesterday's Podcast? Or perhaps it was Fridays...

UK GDP per capita LOWER than Mississippi... This they would be the POOREST state in the US. For reference, Canada is above Mississippi...
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's correct. I'm not sure that per capita GDP is the best way to describe wealth/productivity because of inflated borrowing but it is one way.
KentK93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watch the video right above your post and you will know why the UK is in bad shape.
“If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.