Nick Shirley vs Gavin Newscum (and everyone else)

5,702 Views | 37 Replies | Last: 23 days ago by Science Denier
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg77 said:

Who gets to discern "intent"?

The Democratic Party leadership and their minions in law enforcement and judicial systems.

So, by extension all the vitriol spewed by the Democratic Party leadership calling President Trump a Facist Nazi Hitler clone or the vile hateful dishonest comments directed @ Charlie Kirk should be evidence of criminal intent?
IMHO their comments were on the internet, making them journalists by default.

Never forget, the Democratic Party leadership is hateful, amoral, dishonest, unethical and dishonorable.Well, maybe not Fetterman but the Democratic Party leadership will soon take care of him.
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
With California trying to pass this "stop Nick Shirley" act, can any liberal here tell us how the democrats aren't flat out trying to cover up fraud? Tell us how immigrants aren't defrauding the **** out of American taxpayers.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iraq2xVeteran said:

California Democrats advancing a bill to criminalize undercover investigative journalism is the epitome of fascism that they accuse Republicans of doing. I love how Nick Shirley is exposing fraud across the country.


Seems like an easy win in court. Clear violation of freedom of the press.

Right?
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.