mjschiller said:

---

Over 372,000 inactive voters have been removed from its rolls. Took a lawsuit.

---

Thank you ... I was would have been voting Democratic (by proxy) in CO after 40 years absence.

Hmmmm... Trump lost to Harris by 350,718.

zephyr88 said:

---

Hmmmm... Trump lost to Harris by 350,718.

---

None of these 372,000 voted in that election

BMX Bandit said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Hmmmm... Trump lost to Harris by 350,718.

---

None of these 372,000 voted in that election

---

LOL, I just thought about it again.

They were "inactive voters"... oops!

#fail

mjschiller said:

---

Over 372,000 inactive voters have been removed from its rolls. Took a lawsuit.

---

Of course it took a lawsuit. Dems aren't going to do that unless forced. I'm going to go out on a limb and say those inactive voters somehow all voted dem mysteriously.

BMX Bandit said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Hmmmm... Trump lost to Harris by 350,718.

---

None of these 372,000 voted in that election

---

Or didn't they...

ts5641 said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Hmmmm... Trump lost to Harris by 350,718.

---

None of these 372,000 voted in that election

---

Or didn't they...

---

They didn't.



If they did, then they wouldnt be removed as "inactive"

The CO SOS FAQ pages are useless in regards to what constitutes a Inactive Voter in that state so I'm providing a 3rd party link.

https://www.clerkandrecorder.org/voter-accuracy

Quote:

---

Inactive records: If a voter's record is in Inactive status, it means that, through one or more of the processes described below, the County Clerk has learned that some portion of the voter's information (usually their address) is out of date or needs confirmation. Although the County Clerk doesn't have enough information to cancel the voter's record, the Clerk requires action from the voter before they can get a ballot in the mail or vote in person. Therefore, a voter in Inactive status will not receive a ballot in the mail or be allowed to vote in person until they provide updated information to the County Clerk.

---

Colorado has been overrun by illegals.

outofstateaggie said:

---

Colorado has been overrun by illegals.

---

Is that what we are calling Californians now? I'll allow it.

BTKAG97 said:

---

The CO SOS FAQ pages are useless in regards to what constitutes a Inactive Voter in that state so I'm providing a 3rd party link.

https://www.clerkandrecorder.org/voter-accuracy

Quote:

---

Inactive records: If a voter's record is in Inactive status, it means that, through one or more of the processes described below, the County Clerk has learned that some portion of the voter's information (usually their address) is out of date or needs confirmation. Although the County Clerk doesn't have enough information to cancel the voter's record, the Clerk requires action from the voter before they can get a ballot in the mail or vote in person. Therefore, a voter in Inactive status will not receive a ballot in the mail or be allowed to vote in person until they provide updated information to the County Clerk.

---

---

Here's another quote from a different article.

"...which results in the voter's registration being flagged as "Inactive" with reason "Undeliverable Ballot." These voters are not mailed ballots in the next election, and after two federal election cycles, the record is removed per federal law."

My question, If this was operating as intended, then why did it take a lawsuit to get them removed?

Quote:

---

My question, If this was operating as intended, then why did it take a lawsuit to get them removed?

---

ERIC. Told all of y'all six years ago.

BMX Bandit said:

---

ts5641 said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

zephyr88 said:

---

Hmmmm... Trump lost to Harris by 350,718.

---

None of these 372,000 voted in that election

---

Or didn't they...

---

They didn't.



If they did, then they wouldnt be removed as "inactive"

---

That may be dismissing the significance too quickly. Inactive voters that haven't voted in several elections is one thing but voter registration databases that set an inactive flag on voter registration database records that can be set to active by a script is a problem. Databases that do not actually purge registration records but merely set them as inactive creates an opportunity for massive coordinated fraud in the same way that 66 million SSNs for deceased people creates a pool of SSNs that can be used for fraud.

Andrew Paquette was part of a nationwide audit of the 2020 election. He's from NY so he figured that despite open records laws, NY county election officials would not give him access to the records needed to audit the votes cast. So, he asked for something that he figured would be less controversial and more likely to be granted which was access to voter registration records. He didn't expect to fund anything significant because NY is a deep blue state with a huge Democrat majority. Why bother to manipulate voter rolls when there is no doubt of which party will win?

Paquette was shocked to find that there are hundreds of thousands of voter records in NY that have an inactive flag but are not deleted eveb when the voter is deceased. Upon close inspection, he realized that the voter registration numbers have been algorithmically assigned in such a way that additional information about the record is encoded steganographically.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370835885_The_Caesar_cipher_and_stacking_the_deck_in_New_York_State_voter_rolls

Quote:

---

Voters in New York State are identified by two identification numbers. This study has discovered strong evidence that both numbers have been algorithmically manipulated to produce steganographically concealed record attribute information. One of the several algorithms discovered has been solved. It first utilizes a mechanism nearly identical to the simple 'Caesar Cipher' to change the order of a group of ID numbers. Then, it interlaces them the way a deck of cards is arranged to create a 'stacked deck'. The algorithmic modifications create hidden structure within voter ID numbers. The structure can be used to covertly tag fraudulent records for later use.

---

Paquette shared his information with volunteer auditors in other states and found the same evidence of algorithmic manipulation of voter registration records in staye databases. Researching thousands of individual record of inactive voters across several states, he identified that the presence of large numbers of zombie voter records in states across the country began in the run up to the 2008 election and has increased significantly in every election cycle since then.

This is an interview of Paquette by Richard Syrett.

https://www.podbean.com/ea/dir-wc279-1fe34242

Paquette has also found the algorithmic manipulations in the Harris County voter registrations.

https://www.jinfowar.com/journal/volume-24-issue-3/evidence-sophisticated-id-assignment-algorithm-harris-county-voter-registration-system-security-analysis

Quote:

---

This study examines algorithmic patterns in Harris County, Texas (U.S.) voter registration data, revealing a sophisticated base-8 modular algorithm controlling ID assignment for 2.3 million voters. Analysis of 18 million state records shows this algorithm employs bifurcated distribution patterns that deviate from standard practices and mirror patterns identified in Ohio. Comparative analysis with Tarrant County confirms Harris County's patterns represent deliberate implementation rather than natural database behavior. The algorithm enables covert record attribution while providing no legitimate benefits in public databases. These findings raise concerns under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993's transparency requirements and meet SEC materiality standards, affecting more than 5% of records with engineered modifications that would alter integrity assessments. This research shows how information warfare may target democratic institutions through seemingly benign database management practices.

---

Quote:

---

That may be dismissing the significance too quickly.

---

Never suggested it was insignificant.

It removes a means by which future elections could be compromised. It's a great thing. Next step is finding the fraudulent ballots already compromised