The MAMDANI Act from Chip Roy

6,933 Views | 71 Replies | Last: 21 days ago by Im Gipper
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.

This mindset is why we are where we are. We defeated communism in the 80's, only to let it infiltrate and destroy every sacred institution.

Sit down and shut up. We aren't outlawing a school of thought. We are outlawing the infiltration of dangerous entities who wish to corrupt us from the inside using that school of thought. Our own idiot college students, professors, blue hairs, and libertarians are more than welcome to continue espousing these idiotic schools of thought.

I would prefer to point out why they are stupid rather than try to outlaw them.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
your pushback comes from not reading up on the law before condemning it

Quote:

The term 'Islamic fundamentalism' means a movement to promote or achieve an Islamic society or enforce Islamic values where legal, religious, military, social, cultural, academic, or political power is sought or used to

''(A) advocate or impose Islam as the state sanctioned religion of the United States;

''(B) advocate or enforce Islamic political, legal, military, social, cultural, or academic authority based upon or enforcing Sharia law in any setting;

''(C) advocate, justify, or employ militant jihad;

''(D) advocate or enact the destruction of Christian, Jewish, or other religious communities, churches, synagogues, temples, historical sites, relics, literature, property, organizations, or members; or

''(E) advocate or justify the destruction of western civilization, including the economic, international, or governmental doctrines of capitalism, constitutionalism, republicanism, or liberalism.

WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

Chip has never been a hardliner on immigration.


fake news.


chip roy has 100% rating from numbersUSA https://www.numbersusa.com/grades/tx

173 from immigration accountability project https://iapaction.com/


looks like you just didn't know his stance on immigration.



i know him well...personally...he's genuinely as interested in curtailing immigration as his former boss Sen Cornyn or their former political mentor George W Bush. He runs to the right on the subject in election years just like John McCain did...but he coudlnt' care less in actuality.
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CrackerJackAg said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


Nope. You've been indoctrinated. Our country was not founded on the principal that you could be a Torrey or a communist or a subversive if you want to be.

That is a hippy boomer legacy.

As bad as Mamdani is your views are a joke...and the boomers have nothing to do with your foolish conspiracies...
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

He runs to the right on the subject in election years just like John McCain did..

the votes show he is just as right on immigration in non-election years compared to election years.
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

He runs to the right on the subject in election years just like John McCain did..

the votes show he is just as right on immigration in non-election years compared to election years.

Actually that's not true. Enjoy the blue pill...
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
BusterAg said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.

This mindset is why we are where we are. We defeated communism in the 80's, only to let it infiltrate and destroy every sacred institution.

Sit down and shut up. We aren't outlawing a school of thought. We are outlawing the infiltration of dangerous entities who wish to corrupt us from the inside using that school of thought. Our own idiot college students, professors, blue hairs, and libertarians are more than welcome to continue espousing these idiotic schools of thought.

I would prefer to point out why they are stupid rather than try to outlaw them.

It IS pointed out to them. They refuse to listen.

And they assassinated Charlie Kirk.

Only a fool thinks that there isn't an organized push by people with money and power to turn this into a Communist country.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Quote:

We have a of blue hairs and ignorant libertarians who vote for joke liberals in their party on this board.

JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.

How's that working out for us? What you used to appreciate about America has been completely eroded by the Left's control of education, information media, entertainment, and government. Sprinkle in some GOPe amber of Commerce influence just to make more money and you have a third world country in the making.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WestAustinAg said:

BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

He runs to the right on the subject in election years just like John McCain did..

the votes show he is just as right on immigration in non-election years compared to election years.

Actually that's not true. Enjoy the blue pill...

facts don't care about your feelings.

sponsored legislation. look how many in 2025.

H.R. 7296: SAVE America Act (Jan. 30, 2026)
H.R. 6225: PAUSE Act of 2025 (Nov. 20, 2025)
H.R. 5722: Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act (Oct. 8, 2025)
H.R. 5005: Sanctuary Penalty and Public Protection Act of 2025 (Aug. 19, 2025)
H.R. 4201: TPS Reform Act of 2025 (June 26, 2025)
H.R. 4200: End DED Act (June 26, 2025)
H.R. 3464: To establish the State Border Security Reinforcement Fund and the State Criminal Alien Prosecution and Detention Fund, to make appropriations to each of these funds, and to authorize the use of such amounts for grants to eligible States, State agencies, and units of local government for specified purposes. (May 15, 2025)
H.R. 1953: Deportation Compliance Act (March 6, 2025)
H.R. 885: Drug Cartel Terrorist Designation Act (Jan. 31, 2025)
H.R. 318: Border Safety and Security Act of 2025 (Jan. 9, 2025)
H.R. 22: SAVE Act (Jan. 3, 2025)
H.R. 23: Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act (Jan. 3, 2025)

https://iapaction.com/members/R000614
BboroAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


I tend to agree…but….It doesn't help that McCarthy looks mostly correct from a 2026 point of view
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WestAustinAg said:

CrackerJackAg said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


Nope. You've been indoctrinated. Our country was not founded on the principal that you could be a Torrey or a communist or a subversive if you want to be.

That is a hippy boomer legacy.

As bad as Mamdani is your views are a joke...and the boomers have nothing to do with your foolish conspiracies...

I agree on your push back on the boomer comment. Boomers have held the fort keeping this stuff bottled up for decades. Broad stroke that is not based in reality.

That said, I do not agree with your premise that to be free one can't regulate actions in opposition to the republic. We can, we have, and we should continue to do so. When we rightfully chose to give people the freedom to worship, speak, move etc etc... those rights do not come completely unrestricted. I know you know this. You have not really chosen to elaborate on your position so I am not certain what your intent is.
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WestAustinAg said:

BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

He runs to the right on the subject in election years just like John McCain did..

the votes show he is just as right on immigration in non-election years compared to election years.

Actually that's not true. Enjoy the blue pill...

He posted data from watchdog organizations accounting for votes. You said, you know the guy. I am not sold on Roy but you are doing very little to support your assertions. Where has he been weak on immigration? Solid examples would do every voter a great service.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guilty.

I'm blaming the OP for burying the lead.

Is it similar language around Marxism? I'll have to read the rest of the text tonight I guess.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stupe said:

BusterAg said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.

This mindset is why we are where we are. We defeated communism in the 80's, only to let it infiltrate and destroy every sacred institution.

Sit down and shut up. We aren't outlawing a school of thought. We are outlawing the infiltration of dangerous entities who wish to corrupt us from the inside using that school of thought. Our own idiot college students, professors, blue hairs, and libertarians are more than welcome to continue espousing these idiotic schools of thought.

I would prefer to point out why they are stupid rather than try to outlaw them.

It IS pointed out to them. They refuse to listen.

And they assassinated Charlie Kirk.

Only a fool thinks that there isn't an organized push by people with money and power to turn this into a Communist country.

Who is "they"?

I'm on record saying McCarthy was right, but his tactics were cringe.
Rocky Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


I agree with you, but the idiots are beginning to take over. They have no morals. They will lie, CHEAT, and steal to have their way. Then they will outlaw capitalism and Christianity.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocky Rider said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


I agree with you, but the idiots are beginning to take over. They have no morals. They will lie, CHEAT, and steal to have their way. Then they will outlaw capitalism and Christianity.

So, your strategy is to outlaw Islam to protect the country from outlawing Christianity?

Weird.

Not retracting what others say above. People that support a US under Shira law, which is incompatible with the constitution, shouldn't get an invitation over here.
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The natural fix that all Americans should be able to agree on is that the same requirements to be POTUS should apply to members of Congress, including term limits. That gets rid of ALOT of worthless traitors, foreigners, grifters and fraudsters from Congress.

The main problem is at the federal level in Congress, not who is POTUS.

As for state and local, that can only be fixed with voter turnout and an educated and engaged voters. Mamdani won with like 60% of the vote but only 12% of voters cast ballots, so 7.2% of eligible voters put him in office and immediately 50%+ of voters hate him and disagree with him and his policies, but could not be bothered to vote.

POTUS is the LEAST IMPORTANT vote a person has, but the vast majority only vote during POTUS elections and have no idea who their Rep is.

Rocky Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

Rocky Rider said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


I agree with you, but the idiots are beginning to take over. They have no morals. They will lie, CHEAT, and steal to have their way. Then they will outlaw capitalism and Christianity.

So, your strategy is to outlaw Islam to protect the country from outlawing Christianity?

Weird.

Not retracting what others say above. People that support a US under Shira law, which is incompatible with the constitution, shouldn't get an invitation over here.


Assuming they take over (pack the court, change voting laws, etc) there are only three choices as I see it, live In their system, leave, or shed blood. That really how the world has worked since the beginning of recorded history.
CrackerJackAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WestAustinAg said:

CrackerJackAg said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


Nope. You've been indoctrinated. Our country was not founded on the principal that you could be a Torrey or a communist or a subversive if you want to be.

That is a hippy boomer legacy.

As bad as Mamdani is your views are a joke...and the boomers have nothing to do with your foolish conspiracies...


Ok….
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jarrin Jay said:

The natural fix that all Americans should be able to agree on is that the same requirements to be POTUS should apply to members of Congress, including term limits. That gets rid of ALOT of worthless traitors, foreigners, grifters and fraudsters from Congress.

The main problem is at the federal level in Congress, not who is POTUS.

As for state and local, that can only be fixed with voter turnout and an educated and engaged voters. Mamdani won with like 60% of the vote but only 12% of voters cast ballots, so 7.2% of eligible voters put him in office and immediately 50%+ of voters hate him and disagree with him and his policies, but could not be bothered to vote.

POTUS is the LEAST IMPORTANT vote a person has, but the vast majority only vote during POTUS elections and have no idea who their Rep is.



I would be down for a constitutional amendment extending POTUS requirements to Congress and SCOTUS. I'd even be OK with grandfathering current congressional members in.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hold any law suspect when they make it a punny name.

PATRIOT Act, etc
TRX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

Guilty.

I'm blaming the OP for burying the lead.

Is it similar language around Marxism? I'll have to read the rest of the text tonight I guess.



Hey, I put the link there! And there are more links in the link! Should I just copy and paste the entire article?
ULTRA MAGA
nomad2007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BboroAg said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


I tend to agree…but….It doesn't help that McCarthy looks mostly correct from a 2026 point of view


He wasn't correct, though. Not a single one of his accusations resulted in an arrest or conviction. He went after all the wrong people. Meanwhile, he made it harder for actual intelligence professionals to root out spies. He was a loud mouth who had no idea what he was doing.
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
America will eventually fall, due to its ideals.

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

It's that simple. We import all these foreigners who have no love for our country, our values, or our culture. Their goal is to completely remove any rights we have by using our democratic processes to eventually silence and persecute people who are more in line with what America has stood for for nearly 250 years.

Islam is completely antithetical to ANYTHING American. It will soon destroy us as it is destroying Europe and has already destroyed the litterboxes it spawned from. And guess what, libs? Your Islamist buddies will destroy you first, once they start taking power. You are all useful idiots.
BlackGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
None of the ideas outlined in the act would stand a chance against real democratic values. It's too bad our system is in the gutter and real democratic values have gone out the window, in favor of self enriching politicians who care more about foreign interventions than what's happening here in our country. That's why horrible ideas and practices like these are popping up.

Mamdani won because NY has been run into the ground by your run of the mill politician today. Don't fault the people of NY wanting to try something different. It will fail, but this is why you need leaders who actually give a **** about the places and people they lead, instead of getting rich off their position and selling their constituents and country down the river.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nomad2007 said:

BboroAg said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.


I tend to agree…but….It doesn't help that McCarthy looks mostly correct from a 2026 point of view


He wasn't correct, though. Not a single one of his accusations resulted in an arrest or conviction. He went after all the wrong people. Meanwhile, he made it harder for actual intelligence professionals to root out spies. He was a loud mouth who had no idea what he was doing.

He was correct about commies infiltrating the US.

All of the rest of your sentences are true. These are not mutually exclusive.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good. Jahidi, communist mamdani hates America.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
McCarthy was correct. The media and president was against him. Communist began infiltrating our country in 1917.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.

Nah, they need to be ****ed with at every opportunity. **** the left!
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lagoag said:

Personally I like this bill. I'd love to see it pass. Look no farther than all the Muslims who immigrated here and are wanting us to bend to their laws and won't try and assimilate to the American ways. We need to do something or we'll end up just like the UK.
Agree: Sharia law in many (most?) instances is in complete opposition with our Constitution.
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgFan1974 said:

WestAustinAg said:

BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

He runs to the right on the subject in election years just like John McCain did..

the votes show he is just as right on immigration in non-election years compared to election years.

Actually that's not true. Enjoy the blue pill...

He posted data from watchdog organizations accounting for votes. You said, you know the guy. I am not sold on Roy but you are doing very little to support your assertions. Where has he been weak on immigration? Solid examples would do every voter a great service.

Watchdog groups are often running psyops in completely defiance of what their supposedly doing. The names of the watchdog groups are often misleading and anyone can take all the votes that one takes.

Like saying no to a single immigration vote so that they get credit for that vote but tell the speaker or Sen Maj Leader that he is a no on the one that actually has a chance to pass thus making sure it doesn't pass. This stuff is how a Senator like Cornyn and McCain stay below the radar of his constituencies.

McCain, Cornyn, Thune, McConnell, Lankford in Oklahoma -- they're all pro immigration. How they vote can be manipulated by watchdog groups to help expose or obfuscate their real views.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

Stupe said:

BusterAg said:

McCarthy would be proud.

I hate Mamdani, but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

One of the great things about America is that Americans have the right to be absolute idiots without government interference.

It stuns me that people put a blue star on that post as it pertains to the subject of this thread.

We have a of blue hairs and ignorant libertarians who vote for joke liberals in their party on this board.
This one got elected.
?q=h_667,w_1000,x_0,y_0/w_1280
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WestAustinAg said:

AgFan1974 said:

WestAustinAg said:

BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

He runs to the right on the subject in election years just like John McCain did..

the votes show he is just as right on immigration in non-election years compared to election years.

Actually that's not true. Enjoy the blue pill...

He posted data from watchdog organizations accounting for votes. You said, you know the guy. I am not sold on Roy but you are doing very little to support your assertions. Where has he been weak on immigration? Solid examples would do every voter a great service.

Watchdog groups are often running psyops in completely defiance of what their supposedly doing. The names of the watchdog groups are often misleading and anyone can take all the votes that one takes.

Like saying no to a single immigration vote so that they get credit for that vote but tell the speaker or Sen Maj Leader that he is a no on the one that actually has a chance to pass thus making sure it doesn't pass. This stuff is how a Senator like Cornyn and McCain stay below the radar of his constituencies.

McCain, Cornyn, Thune, McConnell, Lankford in Oklahoma -- they're all pro immigration. How they vote can be manipulated by watchdog groups to help expose or obfuscate their real views.

thats a lot of words just to say you have nothing to rebut what I said and support your position.

roy has sponsored multiple immigration laws. I listed them. From a non-election year.

and the people you listed are not even close to Roy on immigration. I guess the whole numbersUSA is just a scam to help out Roy.

numberUSA:
Roy 100%
Cornyn 60%
Thune 66%
McConnell 60%
Lankford 75%



if one does not like Chip Roy I get it. Thats their prerogative. But don't try to sell this fake news about his immigration stance.
Monkeypoxfighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

BMX Bandit said:

Quote:

but we should not be trying to outlaw schools of thought.

good thing this bill does not outlaw any school of thought.

The law already says this:


Quote:

Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible.

no reason not to specify it applies to these others as well

1) Good point that the law doesn't restrict any Americans from anything, only immigrants.

2) There is a big difference between being a member of the communist party and circulating Marxist materials. For example, where is the line drawn between acceptable Islam and fundamentalist Islam? Who is going to set the standard? Some DC federal court judge? Member of a party is a much brighter line that has less subjectivity around it.

I guess my push-back on this is more from a libertarian standpoint. I generally hate the idea of giving the government power to regulate what is and is not an acceptable political viewpoint, because that can always be turned around on me.


Shooting from the hip here, but aren't there places where party or religious affiliations are required? My dad was a member of the John Birch society because it was pretty much "required" within his military affiliation.
It only took me a year to figure out this place is nuts!
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.