AggieKatie2 said:

---

Is there any precedent of a victim of a crime being sued in civil court for negligence in not pursuing charges against someone that undoubtedly performed an illegal act against them, but then the same criminal harming someone else similarly later?

Would put an end to the "I didnt want to put another XYZ in jail" depsite the obvious guilt.

An obvious criminal committing another crime seems like an obvious risk of not pursuing charges.

---

No. Not even police officers are obligated to help or assist.

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

Got a Natty! said:

---

" The woman chose not to cooperate with prosecutors. She told the New York Post she did not want to put another Black man in jail. She now says she regrets it entirely."

---

How very racist of this woman to see color.

---

Does she regret that she was a liberal, racist, selfish or stupid, because I would say all four.

The funny thing is that the perp will now spend most of his life (hopefully) in jail, not just a few months or weeks!

AggieKatie2 said:

---

Is there any precedent of a victim of a crime being sued in civil court for negligence in not pursuing charges against someone that undoubtedly performed an illegal act against them, but then the same criminal harming someone else similarly later?

Would put an end to the "I didnt want to put another XYZ in jail" depsite the obvious guilt.

An obvious criminal committing another crime seems like an obvious risk of not pursuing charges.

---

You don't want to set that precedent. Lawyers and the government would have a field day with picking winners and losers.

National divorce!!!

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

These journalists need to stop capitalizing "black."

---

Just keep tooting on that whistle, sir.



TOOT TOOT!!!!1

aggiehawg said:

---

AggieKatie2 said:

---

Is there any precedent of a victim of a crime being sued in civil court for negligence in not pursuing charges against someone that undoubtedly performed an illegal act against them, but then the same criminal harming someone else similarly later?

Would put an end to the "I didnt want to put another XYZ in jail" depsite the obvious guilt.

An obvious criminal committing another crime seems like an obvious risk of not pursuing charges.

---

No. Not even police officers are obligated to help or assist.

---

100% understand that.

It would be interesting to have the latest victim sue the lady in civil court, and then have the jury listen to her say, "yes I knew who assaulted me", "yes the police told me he had a history"...then why did you choose not to press charges, "well because he was black"

Did it occur to you since he assaulted you and others in the past it past that he may assault others in the future since you elected not to pursue charges because "he was black"?.....

Some juries may not find that reasonable.

Got a Natty! said:

---

A criminal is a ciminal, regardless of skin color. Pretty easy concept.

---

Why must you be so racist? Don't you realize it's the fault of our racist laws and racist social constructs? How can someone take responsibility for their crimes when no crime can ever be their fault due to racism? If we don't allow law abiders to just accept that they might be mugged, raped, maimed, or murdered but it's ok- it's not the perp's fault - then we can never get rid of racism.

AggieKatie2 said:

---

It would be interesting to have the latest victim sue the lady in civil court,

---

well, the latest victim is dead, so....

Got a Natty! said:

---

Elderly man pushed down the stairs going into a subway station. Bad guy had been arrested approximately 5 times since February. Once for assaulting a LEO and and another for assaulting a woman on the subway.

For assault on the LEO he was released on "non monetary" bond. On the assault on the obviously white woman on the subway, she refused to cooperate.

" The woman chose not to cooperate with prosecutors. She told the New York Post she did not want to put another Black man in jail. She now says she regrets it entirely."

And I am sure she suffers from TDS. A criminal is a ciminal, regardless of skin color. Pretty easy concept.

---

Taylor Sheridan basically calls this out on the first episode of The Madison when the blond daughter gets knocked out and robbed and is scared to tell the cops that it was a black dude that did it.

Quote:

---

" The woman chose not to cooperate with prosecutors. She told the New York Post she did not want to put another Black man in jail.

---

Sadly, almost half the people in this country fully support this approach to crime and the prosecution of crime.

What these idiots do not understand is that this mindset actually incourages crime by telling people of a certain race that they will very likely not be prosecuted no matter what they do.

Trout said:

---

AggieKatie2 said:

---

Is there any precedent of a victim of a crime being sued in civil court for negligence in not pursuing charges against someone that undoubtedly performed an illegal act against them, but then the same criminal harming someone else similarly later?

Would put an end to the "I didnt want to put another XYZ in jail" depsite the obvious guilt.

An obvious criminal committing another crime seems like an obvious risk of not pursuing charges.

---

You don't want to set that precedent. Lawyers and the government would have a field day with picking winners and losers.

---

Seems like they do that already now

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

Got a Natty! said:

---

" The woman chose not to cooperate with prosecutors. She told the New York Post she did not want to put another Black man in jail. She now says she regrets it entirely."

---

How very racist of this woman to see color.

---

I bet she was "highly educated" too.

Import the third world, become the third world.

deddog said:

---

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

Got a Natty! said:

---

" The woman chose not to cooperate with prosecutors. She told the New York Post she did not want to put another Black man in jail. She now says she regrets it entirely."

---

How very racist of this woman to see color.

---

I bet she was "highly educated" too.

---

Liberals are always the ones to bring race into it. He was a bad guy a criminal. His race should not have mattered, but she was virtue signaling and now she basically helped him kill another person.

The Regret: The woman told the New York Post, "I regret it 100% and I actually feel really bad that a man lost his life". She added, "Maybe a part of me was just like, I don't want to put another black man in jail, but, you know, at some point, if you are a criminal, you're a criminal, and he was scary, he was a scary guy".

The case has gained attention as an example of the consequences of non-cooperation with law enforcement and the debate over bail policies.

New Yorkers voted for it, live with it.

Or in this case, die with it.

Quote:

---

white woman

---

liberal white women are the worst.

Putting sociopaths in jail actually helps potential victims AND the criminal too. The criminal csnt be adding to his or her record if they are in prison, and some do age out of being a sociopath eventually.

AggieKatie2 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

AggieKatie2 said:

---

Is there any precedent of a victim of a crime being sued in civil court for negligence in not pursuing charges against someone that undoubtedly performed an illegal act against them, but then the same criminal harming someone else similarly later?

Would put an end to the "I didnt want to put another XYZ in jail" depsite the obvious guilt.

An obvious criminal committing another crime seems like an obvious risk of not pursuing charges.

---

No. Not even police officers are obligated to help or assist.

---

100% understand that.

It would be interesting to have the latest victim sue the lady in civil court, and then have the jury listen to her say, "yes I knew who assaulted me", "yes the police told me he had a history"...then why did you choose not to press charges, "well because he was black"

Did it occur to you since he assaulted you and others in the past it past that he may assault others in the future since you elected not to pursue charges because "he was black"?.....

Some juries may not find that reasonable.

---

Doesn't really matter. Would not be an intentional tort against the man attacked (or his estate) nor would that satisfy all of the elements for negligence, IMO. Particularly, duty owed, breach of that duty and proximate cause.

Quote:

---

Did it occur to you since he assaulted you and others in the past it past that he may assault others in the future since you elected not to pursue charges because "he was black"?.....

---

So she thinks she was not being racist by making a decision based solely on race?

Did I read that right?

If I'm the victim of an assault crime then I'm going to do everything in my power to see that person punished and I don't give a crap if they're lilly white or dark as a moonless night.

What kind of monster am I? /s

agent-maroon said:

---

If I'm the victim of an assault crime then I'm going to do everything in my power to see that person punished and I don't give a crap if they're lilly white or dark as a moonless night.

What kind of monster am I? /s

---

your lack of white guilt for being assaulted and not having sympathy for only certain criminals based on their skin tone sounds pretty racist

Colonel Kurtz said:

---

Import the third world, become the third world.

---

And the slave trade was America's first example of that.