Trump endorses Paxton

14,334 Views | 159 Replies | Last: 18 days ago by nortex97
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
northeastag said:

I'm thinking that internal polls must be showing Paxton with a large lead. Trump wouldn't throw over Cornyn if he thought he'd need him for the next couple years. At best, he would just sit it out.

As for, "this time, Texas is turning blue". Yea, right.

This is just Trump following through with what he told Thune, Cornyn, Cassidy, etc. Get the Save Act passed and I will endorse you. They didn't, so he endorsed Paxton.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not saying Texas is turning blue. I'm say that IF it were to happen, this is how.

It's just an unnecessary risk, and for what? The chance to elect a guy who is crooked even by the standards of the modern political establishment? A guy who used your tax dollars to pay off mistresses? It's all just so very stupid.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When did Trump say he'd ever endorse Cassidy?

You are just making things up!

I'm Gipper
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

When did Trump say he'd ever endorse Cassidy?

You are just making things up!

Hold told those guys to get Save passed and he would endorse Cornyn. They didn't. So he endorsed Paxton.
CampSkunk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm afraid this endorsement is going to turn out like some other Trump endorsements. Senator Oz and Senator Walker - never heard of them. But we now may get to see Senator Talarico. Cornyn's mistake is believing that if you vote with Trump over 90% of the time it will mean something to Trump. But to MAGA and Trump you must be perfect, or you're a RINO. Electability means nothing. One thing we know for certain, Paxton's opponent will vote for Trump 0% of the time.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

Im Gipper said:

When did Trump say he'd ever endorse Cassidy?

You are just making things up!

Hold told those guys to get Save passed and he would endorse Cornyn. They didn't. So he endorsed Paxton.



I know that the endorsement was tied to the SAVE America Act.


Your statement "he told Thune, Cornyn, Cassidy, etc. Get the Save Act passed and I will endorse you"


Is a Fantasy. He never told Thune or Cassidy anything about endorsing them.

I'm Gipper
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

And if Texas cannot see through the fraud preacher that is Talarico, then we deserve a Democrat Senator.

This. If the difference between Paxton and Cornyn is sufficient to hand the state to a fop like Talarico, we are too far gone anyway.

That said, it's not happening.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

txags92 said:

Im Gipper said:

When did Trump say he'd ever endorse Cassidy?

You are just making things up!

Hold told those guys to get Save passed and he would endorse Cornyn. They didn't. So he endorsed Paxton.



I know that the endorsement was tied to the SAVE America Act.


Your statement "he told Thune, Cornyn, Cassidy, etc. Get the Save Act passed and I will endorse you"


Is a Fantasy. He never told Thune or Cassidy anything about endorsing them.

I used confusing language. He told those guys that if they wanted him to endorse Cornyn, they needed to get the Save act passed. I should have said Cornyn instead of "you" in the original sentence. I wasn't trying to imply more than that.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
digging tunnels
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I also recall that Cornyn has said not to vote for Trump in 2024 because he couldn't win

Oops
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

I'm not saying Texas is turning blue. I'm say that IF it were to happen, this is how.

It's just an unnecessary risk, and for what?

No, it isn't.
Sq 17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really no good reason for Trump
To get involved in this race

Seems likely that if he felt like it Cornyn could stop showing up for work and maybe Trump might need his RINO vote on something over the next few months
Reno Hightower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The ****** bag wins the presidential endorsement over the turd sandwich.
Waco Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just shows you how pathetic the republican party in Texas is. We get to choose from a career do nothing politician that is the walking billboard for term and age limits or a droop eyed crook to pick from. Texas deserves better.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tea Party said:

Teslag said:

Who cares. As senator is only job is to be a reliable Republican vote.

It's telling that you used the word "Republican" instead of "conservative".


Here's a hint

It's an election to represent the republican ****ing party, not a litmus test on conservatism.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Tea Party said:

Teslag said:

Who cares. As senator is only job is to be a reliable Republican vote.

It's telling that you used the word "Republican" instead of "conservative".


Here's a hint

It's an election to represent the republican ****ing party, not a litmus test on conservatism.

Yea, it's a losing mindset they have. Like the "decorum" detractors of Trump 1.0. They want guys who make a stink about school prayer and rattle a drum on abortion then get shellacked by the Dems playing a decades long game to socialize and communize the US.

It's going to take fighting back, on their turf, to take things back.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just watched a talking head say Texas should own the result - you broke it if you elect Paxton. They shouldn't have to divert money from other states in the general... Really? After spending $150M in a primary on a candidate that was rejected by his constituents?
Isosceles_Kramer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't forget the child mutilator Talarico. Choice gets a lot easier.

Dude who spits on religion while advocating for cutting off kids genitals, or the other loser.

Still easy.
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
StandUpforAmerica said:

This is about all he can say. It's a tough spot for him.



The fact Coryn mentioned Talarico in his tweet is Laughable. What a Rino fraud.

Those polls showing Talarico is ahead potentially are run by untrustable Democrat stooges trying to get donations from big donors into the Texas race.
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMU1990 said:

I just watched a talking head say Texas should own the result - you broke it if you elect Paxton. They shouldn't have to divert money from other states in the general... Really? After spending $150M in a primary on a candidate that was rejected by his constituents?

Exactly But it will soon be time to put our money up. I'll donate and double down by putting the same amount on the gambling site for the Paxton Win!!!
'With the current odds I'll get all my money back.
Old Army Ghost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Tea Party said:

Teslag said:

Who cares. As senator is only job is to be a reliable Republican vote.

It's telling that you used the word "Republican" instead of "conservative".


Here's a hint

It's an election to represent the republican ****ing party, not a litmus test on conservatism.
yeah besides conservatives are principled and republicans arent
Old Army has gone to hell.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mas89 said:

StandUpforAmerica said:

This is about all he can say. It's a tough spot for him.



The fact Coryn mentioned Talarico in his tweet is Laughable. What a Rino fraud.

Those polls showing Talarico is ahead potentially are run by untrustable Democrat stooges trying to get donations from big donors into the Texas race.

That post by Cornyn also highlights why relying on the old "voted with him 99%" metric is useless. When you get a guy like Cornyn in a leadership role, he can make sure that some things never even have to come up for a true up or down vote. And the Senate filibuster rules allow them to "vote for" cloture of debate on lots of things that they know will never pass that hurdle, while never having to vote against it if it actually came up for a true up or down vote. So they can say they "voted with Trump" on it, while making sure that they don't put any effort into actually working out a deal that has a chance of actually passing the real vote with enough support to get over the filibuster.
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's what the Rinos did with the Save Act.
GMaster0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I voted for Paxton because he's crazy and we need more crazy in Texas. I'm also in voting bloodlust mode.
dds08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How could anyone be against making it mandatory to have an ID to vote? Why are folks making a no brainer into a needlessly complicated endeavor?

They have to be the folks that believe 81 million votes was bona fide.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cornyn needs to focus on his future now.

UntoldSpirit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We are in a fight for our lives against Marxism and forced submission. They are intent on outlawing conservatism, and punishing financially or even arresting what would be in the past ordinary patriotic Americans. This is what Marxists do and its alarming to hear it in there current rhetoric. And they moderate their rhetoric to hide their true intentions. Fair elections will not be possible.

I'm not sure exactly how bad Paxton's character is. But I feel pretty good about him fighting against this wave that's coming over America - we don't have time to find a perfect or even a better guy. Paxton is going to defeat Cornyn, so there's no room for fighting for some principal that will cause the loss of all of our principals.

These are not normal times. This isn't 25 years ago when you could afford to live through a Bill Clinton. The delusion has progressed. A vote for any democrat, or even sitting this one out, is a vote for radical progressives and we are close to losing our country and our freedom.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The ONLY way Talarico wins Texas is if so called "Conservatives" act like petulant, crying children who sit on their asses pouting instead of casting a vote for the Texas Republican candidate.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Preach.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
StandUpforAmerica said:

This is about all he can say. It's a tough spot for him.




Just get your butt buddy Thune to pass the SAVE act you pendejo.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are a lot of scaredy cat republican voters on here that have swallowed the RINO propaganda.
Jeeper79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amen brother. Unfortunately, there are many on the right who have their eyes closed, including several in Congress.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

wessimo said:

Hoo boy...

Probably over sampled Democrats by at least 10%. Talrico isn't going to win this Senate seat.



That came from a betting site running by a Dem super donor.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BTKAG97 said:

The ONLY way Talarico wins Texas is if so called "Conservatives" act like petulant, crying children who sit on their asses pouting instead of casting a vote for the Texas Republican candidate.

And if the JOOS pour money into Talarico.
Apparently American voters are stupid and the joos can swing elections. I learnt this from the Massie thread
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.