Sumlins Pool Guy said:
Homestead exemption should freeze the property tax at the Purchase Price. It's insane you have no idea what your tax will be on an asset. Add a 5% tax at sale (in this scenario I would have already put all the realtors in concentration camps so you're really no worse off)
This creates too many loopholes. If this passed, I would immediately gift all of my property to my kids and they would claim those properties as their homestead. It doesn't make sense to do that now, but freezing the tax base at purchase price would significantly impact individual behavior to take advantage of that. It would discourage home ownership, and create a lot more fraud about people claiming property that they rent rooms out of as their homestead, and rent apartments or houses elsewhere, in order to take advantage of the tax situations.
Not saying that the idea isn't better, but it has problems of its own.
Quote:
We also need to address the the Ag exemptions that subsidize recreational properties all over the state. I'm sorry but having recreational property that you shoe horn in ag use to get the tax break that then then requires that country to be subsidized isn't exactly what the ag exemption is for. If you live on the property and the farm or ranch is your primary income then continue as you were. But if you're a guy who spends more on high fences and protein feed then the ag income a year then you have a hobby not an ag business that I need to subsidize.
There should be some reform here. Simply eliminating ag exemptions for recreational properties would be too jarring, and penalize certain property owners that, for example, inherited 100 acres from their grandfather that has been in the family for generations. It would need to be replaced with something, or reformed so that large, obliviously commercial Ag exemptions that aren't really Ag exemptions are eliminated.
Good luck though. Those guys donate a lot of money to politics, and are not likely targets for higher taxes.