Waffledynamics said:

---

Otherwise, what is the point of voting for them over a 3rd party?

---

Voting for a 3rd party is basically a wasted vote or a vote for the Dems. Anyone who doesn't agree with the Dems extremely demonic platform needs to vote for Republicans or nothing will ever change.

Logos Stick said:

---

Liberals cities have also started modifying data to hide crime.

---

They've been doing that for years

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

The Texas legislature passed bond reform last session.

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

• On a Federal level the recourse would be impeachment which at the moment there is not enough of a majority.
• IANAL but think it is the same in a state level.

Are they doing anything?

• I believe some Republican tried to bring impeachment before Congress and was denied in committee.

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

US lawmaker moves to impeach federal judge

• This action follows Ogles's ongoing bid to remove US federal judge John Bates after he ordered the Trump administration to restore federal health websites and databases that the administration had pulled offline.

I believe this isn't the only attempt

Anyone considering voting for any Democrat candidate @ any level of government should immediately reconsider their voting intentions.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

Cross reference where the most crimes happen with who is in charge of them.

Sadly we can't force Democrats to stop coddling criminals and enabling crime in their areas. Only pledge to not do the same in ours

---

So why have Republicans left the cities and ceded them to the Democrats?

Or the universities? Or the MSM?

What does withdrawing from society accomplish?

BonfireNerd04 said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

Cross reference where the most crimes happen with who is in charge of them.

Sadly we can't force Democrats to stop coddling criminals and enabling crime in their areas. Only pledge to not do the same in ours

---

So why have Republicans left the cities and ceded them to the Democrats?

Or the universities? Or the MSM?

What does withdrawing from society accomplish?

---

They've live in better neighborhoods, they have raised their kids in better schools. They have made choices that is best for themselves and their families.

Recent things that have stopped/limited crime:

• Closed the border
• Deport illegals (majority who have committed crimes since being here)
• Washington DC turnaround
• Memphis crime has plummeted...in both this and DC, the liberal leaders of the cities have acknowledged it

More locally...I live in a very red area. Tons of HPD, Sheriffs, and Constables vehicles driving around the neighborhoods. Crime is very low, and when something big does happen, it's addressed quickly and patros are increased.

Well, at least they're not the ones that are committing the crime, defending the crime and letting people off of the crimes.

Yeah, I wanna see more from the Republicans and they are certainly trying in certain aspects, but it's the Democrats that have ****ed our country and continue to **** our country.

Waffledynamics said:

---

Ol_Ag_02 said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

If you really want to solve crime you're gonna have to eliminate Democrats. That's the hard truth.

---

Okay, why can't Republicans do this in states they control? DeSantis did it in Florida, removing DAs who won't prosecute crimes. Why aren't other states following suit?

---

Not all states seceded that authority to the governor. AI search assistant's answer
quote
Authority of State Governors to Remove District Attorneys
State governors generally have the authority to remove district attorneys (DAs) for cause, but the specifics can differ by state. Below is a summary of how this authority is structured across various states.
General Process

• For Cause Removal: Most states allow governors to remove DAs for specific reasons, often termed "for cause."
• State Law Variability: The process and grounds for removal can be explicitly defined in state law or may require additional legislative approval.

State. Removal Authority. Conditions for Removal
California. Yes. Requires cause as defined by state law.
Texas. Yes. Must follow statutory procedures.
New York. Yes. Requires a formal process and justification.
Florida. Yes. Must provide evidence of misconduct.
Illinois. Yes. Subject to legislative approval.
Conclusion
While governors in many states can remove district attorneys, the specific procedures and requirements vary significantly. It is essential to consult the laws of each state for detailed information on the removal process.

My note: seems it is not easy and if laws are changed the wording must be narrow, specific otherwise the Democratic Party leadership will weaponize it to remove law abiding honest Judges.

rocky the dog said:

---

Quote:

---

Cross reference where the most crimes happen with who is in charge of them.

---

---

What an amazing coincidence, huh...

BonfireNerd04 said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

Cross reference where the most crimes happen with who is in charge of them.

Sadly we can't force Democrats to stop coddling criminals and enabling crime in their areas. Only pledge to not do the same in ours

---

So why have Republicans left the cities and ceded them to the Democrats?

Or the universities? Or the MSM?

What does withdrawing from society accomplish?

---

Because they were outnumbered. Democrats tend to congregate in urban cores because that's where government services, welfare services, big culture stuff, central entertainment districts, etc tend to be. It's also where all the third and fourth world immigrants wind up.

Hard to beat math.

ICYMI: "Violent crime plummets across major U.S. cities"

Quote:

---

ICYMI: "Violent crime plummets across major U.S. cities"

---

You act like the Dems have done something to curb violent crimes.

rocky the dog said:

---

Quote:

---

Cross reference where the most crimes happen with who is in charge of them.

---

---

Ok, there is no way that Vermont has more violent crime than Oklahoma.

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

I live in Montgomery County a very RED county. Harris County a very leftist county, is known for letting criminals go free with a 100 dollar bond.

There is a reason this billboard sits just inside Montgomery County lines.

Federal level legislation isn't going to solve crime issues in blue cities until the people in the blue cities have had enough. But as long as they are ok with homelessness, releasing criminals over a "minor" offense with limited or no bail, etc. then it won't change.

Talarico is literally running on the idea that prisons are violent and wants a system of "love and not violence." So do you think Republicans have much of a chance to do anything at the state or local level when you are dealing with people who think like this? This is the mindset of most of the people who run the blue cities which is why Talarico is the darling of the media right now.

rocky the dog said:

---

Quote:

---

Cross reference where the most crimes happen with who is in charge of them.

---

---

Obligatory:

On the inverse, what have democrats done to not solve crime.

BonfireNerd04 said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

Cross reference where the most crimes happen with who is in charge of them.

Sadly we can't force Democrats to stop coddling criminals and enabling crime in their areas. Only pledge to not do the same in ours

---

So why have Republicans left the cities and ceded them to the Democrats?

Or the universities? Or the MSM?

What does withdrawing from society accomplish?

---

Very few have withdrawn from society.

I mean, they have called in yhe national guard in multiple cities.

Are we hoping for nation wide martial law?

This whole thread is crazy talk.

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

LOL. Good one. Some people are just dumb. It's not necessarily their fault. Their parents were probably dumb too.

Solve crime? Really?

Did you mean to type reduce crime?

Waffledynamics said:

---

They ran on this. Have they done anything? Are they forcing judges to face accountability when they let violent criminals go free on bail who then commit more violent crime?

Are they doing anything?

What good are the Republicans for this issue?

---

I used DuckDuckGo to search this quote,"What have the Republicans done to solve crime?" The Search Assistant came up with:

"Republican Strategies to Address Crime
Increased Law Enforcement Resources

• Funding for Law Enforcement: Republicans have advocated for increased funding to bolster law enforcement agencies. This includes hiring more officers and providing additional resources to tackle crime effectively.
• Tougher Sentencing Laws: There has been a push for implementing stricter sentencing laws aimed at repeat offenders. This is part of a broader strategy to deter crime through more severe consequences for criminal behavior.

Community Programs

• Juvenile Crime Reduction Initiatives: Republicans have promoted community programs designed to reduce juvenile crime. These initiatives often focus on providing after-school programs, mentorship, and resources to at-risk youth, aiming to prevent them from engaging in criminal activities.
• Collaboration with Local Communities: Efforts have been made to foster partnerships between law enforcement and community organizations. This collaboration is intended to address the root causes of crime and enhance public safety.

Legislative Efforts

• Proposed Crime Legislation: Republicans have introduced various bills aimed at enhancing public safety. These proposals often include measures to strengthen law enforcement capabilities and address issues like gang violence and drug-related crimes.

Criticism of Current Policies

• Opposition to Leniency: Republicans have criticized what they perceive as leniency in prosecuting repeat offenders. They argue that this approach undermines public safety and contributes to rising crime rates.

By focusing on these strategies, Republicans aim to create a safer environment and reduce crime across communities.
,,,… there is a lot more, I suggest you research further.
Republicans have put extensive efforts into reducing crime as opposed to the Democratic Party leadership that has enabled crime, especially violent crime(ie: releasing violent offenders with no or little bail). This while weaponizing the legal system to attack innocent people.(IRS targeting conservatives, Michael Flynn, etc.)

OP's question drives me crazy.

Of the multiple items he is concerned about, if he doesn't get his way on one of them, he will vote third party and in essence spilt the vote and let these idiot democrats in control.

We have a problem in our land and if these clowns get in control, we are all doomed.

So quit complaining about every little thing. The only thing you need to worry about is keeping democrats out of office. Don't throw a fit and vote 3rd party…..

Nuff said

The OPs question is either extremely uninformed, or a purposeful troll.


One party is sending out the national guard, hiring and deploying ICE agents, cutting off fraudulent funding, deporting criminals, closing the border, stopping drug dealers before they reach our border, etc etc etc.


The other party is literally protesting and trying to stop EVERY SINGLE one of those efforts.

I chalk it up to willful ignorance.

army01 said:

---

rocky the dog said:

---

Quote:

---

Cross reference where the most crimes happen with who is in charge of them.

---

---

What violent crimes are occuring in the Northwestern corner of Wyoming? We talking about bears. moose, and bison attacking tourist in Yellowstone?

---

A feud between a couple of old geysers.

Magneto said:

---

OP's question drives me crazy.

Of the multiple items he is concerned about, if he doesn't get his way on one of them, he will vote third party and in essence spilt the vote and let these idiot democrats in control.

We have a problem in our land and if these clowns get in control, we are all doomed.

So quit complaining about every little thing. The only thing you need to worry about is keeping democrats out of office. Don't throw a fit and vote 3rd party…..

Nuff said

---

OP wants Mayberry. Problem with that thinking is, Mayberry is a fictional town. If you actually want a Mayberry town, you have to bring back true street cops with knife sticks and the ability to crack skulls without lawsuits and jail time. Doubt anyone would want that, except for tax payers who are tired of their streets being run by the thugs. So here we are, lawlessness and chaos the new normal.

The Ex Officio Director said:

---

Magneto said:

---

OP's question drives me crazy.

Of the multiple items he is concerned about, if he doesn't get his way on one of them, he will vote third party and in essence spilt the vote and let these idiot democrats in control.

We have a problem in our land and if these clowns get in control, we are all doomed.

So quit complaining about every little thing. The only thing you need to worry about is keeping democrats out of office. Don't throw a fit and vote 3rd party…..

Nuff said

---

OP wants Mayberry. Problem with that thinking is, Mayberry is a fictional town. If you actually want a Mayberry town, you have to bring back true street cops with knife sticks and the ability to crack skulls without lawsuits and jail time. Doubt anyone would want that, except for tax payers who are tired of their streets being run by the thugs. So here we are, lawlessness and chaos the new normal.

---

A sheriff with no gun, as well as, a deputy that carries a holstered gun and one bullet in his shirt pocket??