weeks to count the votes in Cali

2,132 Views | 32 Replies | Last: 33 min ago by YouBet
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cali is like Haiti only worse because it's filled with white liberals.

TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course, they don't know how many they need
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Complete, total, and purposeful, democrat dysfunction. Absolutely embarrassing for an advanced nation. Just embarrassing.

Pratt is cooked.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
California is going to cheat their asses off, like they always do, and nothing will be done about it, because short of kicking them out of the union, nothing CAN be done about it.
Darthag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The most famous quote attributed to Joseph Stalin regarding elections is: "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." [1, 2]

Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Cali is like Haiti only worse because it's filled with white liberals.



Yeah...because how could a state that claims it's the center of all technology count it quicker...
You can turn off signatures, btw
Gnome Sayin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Takes weeks to print votes. Weeks
BaileyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The fix is in
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAGBQ76 said:

Of course, they don't know how many they need


They have the ballots, just waiting to see when to magically make them appear.

This country is a 3rd world country now.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Totally unsurprising. Pratt never had a chance. No Republican will ever have a chance there. It's lost.
DD88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ballot harvesting, no Voter ID, mail-in ballots accepted 7 days after election, and 37 days to count the votes makes makes California Elections fraudulent by design.
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Still weird that our resident Democrats never touch these threads.

They don't care that so many of their fellow citizens don't trust the election process, because for some reason any of the shady or suspect practices seem to only benefit their party, another weird phenomena.
I don't think you know me.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Logos Stick said:

Cali is like Haiti only worse because it's filled with white liberals.



Yeah...because how could a state that claims it's the center of all technology count it quicker...

Oh...wait...

ETA: I forgot it's the STATE that empowers people to be lazy and useless.
You can turn off signatures, btw
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jack Squat 83 said:

Still weird that our resident Democrats never touch these threads.

They don't care that so many of their fellow citizens don't trust the election process, because for some reason any of the shady or suspect practices seem to only benefit their party, another weird phenomena.


But democracy "dies in the dark" because of Republicans.

Meanwhile, the Dems murder it in the sunlight right in front of you.

No one double standards like a US Democrat. Soviet Commies and German Nazis are jealous of them at this point.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ship predicts that Trump's changes with the USPS will severely affect Cali's BS with MIBs.

Here are the changes:

  • Voter Lists and Pre-Approval for Delivery: States must submit lists of registered voters (or those requesting mail ballots) to USPS in advance for federal elections. USPS can then cross-check and potentially reject or block delivery of ballots to voters not on approved federal or supplemented lists. This creates a federal gatekeeping role via USPS.

    Special Ballot Envelopes and Tracking: Outbound and return ballots must use standardized "Official Election Mail" envelopes with unique Intelligent Mail barcodes (or equivalent). This enables better tracking, verification, and rejection of non-compliant mailings.
  • Data Sharing Requirements: States provide voter names, addresses, and ballot barcodes to USPS ahead of mailing. This allows pre-screening and monitoring.
  • Postmark and Timing Adjustments: Related changes (some from late 2025) alter how postmarks are interpreted and processed, potentially delaying them. This could affect deadlines in states like California that count ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later (up to 7 days after).



  • ts5641
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Nothing suspicious to see here. Completely normal that 3rd world hellholes can count votes in one day but California can't.
    And yet Thune refuses to move the Save America Act forward.
    ts5641
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Logos Stick said:

    Ship predicts that Trump's changes with the USPS will severely affect Cali's BS with MIBs.

    Here are the changes:

  • Voter Lists and Pre-Approval for Delivery: States must submit lists of registered voters (or those requesting mail ballots) to USPS in advance for federal elections. USPS can then cross-check and potentially reject or block delivery of ballots to voters not on approved federal or supplemented lists. This creates a federal gatekeeping role via USPS.

    Special Ballot Envelopes and Tracking: Outbound and return ballots must use standardized "Official Election Mail" envelopes with unique Intelligent Mail barcodes (or equivalent). This enables better tracking, verification, and rejection of non-compliant mailings.
  • Data Sharing Requirements: States provide voter names, addresses, and ballot barcodes to USPS ahead of mailing. This allows pre-screening and monitoring.
  • Postmark and Timing Adjustments: Related changes (some from late 2025) alter how postmarks are interpreted and processed, potentially delaying them. This could affect deadlines in states like California that count ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later (up to 7 days after).





  • They cheat. This has been going on for a while and conservatives are slowly waking up to it.
    AgBQ-00
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    they will keep finding boxes of ballots and counting until they block out any of the non-approved candidates.
    God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

    We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
    Funky Winkerbean
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Here's looking at you Mr Thune.
    4stringAg
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    And people that question election results are called "election deniers" or against democracy. When one party actively subverts transparency, cares nothing for chain of custody on ballots, has no care to ensure people voting are who they say they are, implements election methods that are purposely rife with holes and fraud and wouldn't pass a basic process audit; then you are becoming a banana republic. Thune and some of the squishy Republicans are worthless ****s for not advancing the SAVE act and aiding/abetting this lunacy.
    IslanderAg04
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    We know one thing, dems are worried.
    Pichael Thompson
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Send the feds in & charge the election thieves w treason

    Upon guilty verdicts line em up for the firing squad


    BTKAG97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    You won't be able to convince me that election fraud has not been going on in California since, at least, the 2000 Bush election cycle.
    Urban Ag
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Democrats are openly justifying supporting Platner in Maine. A Nazi sympathizer, weirdo, who texts his junk around and hangs out on teen hookup aps.

    Their justification, again stated openly, we must win at all costs.

    So what's a little cheating? Or a lot?
    Jock 07
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    AgBQ-00 said:

    they will keep finding boxes of ballots and counting until they block out any of the non-approved candidates.

    Yup, pretty sure Stewart smalley is a consultant for them now
    4
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Saw a report that a batch of 22,000 mail in ballots came in last night and not a single vote for Pratt amongst them.

    From WABC in New York.

    77 WABC - Social media is in a frenzy after 22,000... | Facebook https://share.google/87cffoftxCmRlCuqQ

    This is statistically impossible.

    They are blatantly cheating... Again... And they don't care who knows it.

    We need a national divorce. Now.
    schmellba99
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    AgBQ-00 said:

    they will keep finding boxes of ballots and counting until they block out any of the non-approved candidates.

    No clue on the truth of it (but wouldn't surprise me if it is absolutely true) but some random twitter post that showed up on my facebook feed said that out of 23,000 ballots from an overnight ballot dump in the LA race - Pratt received exactly zero votes.

    The guy that is polling at roughly 30% magically gets 0%. Amazing.

    While that may be statistically possible, the fact of the matter is that it is such an infinitesimally small chance of it happening that it really can't be possible in any real world scenario.

    Edit - 4 beat me to the punch.
    Rocky Rider
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Pichael Thompson said:

    Send the feds in & charge the election thieves w treason

    Upon guilty verdicts line em up for the firing squad





    So you're saying address election cheating and improve the gene pool with one action ?
    BusterAg
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    4 said:

    California is going to cheat their asses off, like they always do, and nothing will be done about it, because short of kicking them out of the union, nothing CAN be done about it.

    Congress has the constitutional right to pass laws regulating federal elections.
    AgGrad99
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG

    Thing is....I don't want anyone cheating, whether it benefits my vote or not. Dems, Repubs, IND's, etc...

    But only one side is fighting the safeguards.


    Everyone, on all sides, from all parties, should be appalled. How is this nation so far gone, that people aren't holding legislators feet to the fire, to protect the sanctity of our votes?

    This should be priority #1...nothing else matters without our voice heard.
    Maroon Dawn
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    The real give away is that suddenly all the newly found votes are for the third place Democrat and not Karen Bass who has already clinched a spot so that Pratt will be squeezed out. What's happening is statistically impossible but Dems insist that finding 30k new votes all for the third place Democrat is completely legit
    YouBet
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Maroon Dawn said:

    The real give away is that suddenly all the newly found votes are for the third place Democrat and not Karen Bass who has already clinched a spot so that Pratt will be squeezed out. What's happening is statistically impossible but Dems insist that finding 30k new votes all for the third place Democrat is completely legit

    Yep. The cheating is in plain sight.
    Refresh
    Page 1 of 1
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.