Situation Room Breach

11,849 Views | 102 Replies | Last: 10 days ago by TRX
AxelFoley85
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:20p, 6/14/26
Holy crap if true. Outright treason.

Reply Quote
11
jt2hunt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:30p, 6/14/26
AG
How's that legal?
Reply Quote
84
Ciboag96
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:32p, 6/14/26
We start hanging Communists this will stop
Reply Quote
197
Tabasco
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:33p, 6/14/26
AG
Isn't she one of the biggest TDS out there? Name seems familiar of someone exceptionally loony and Triggered.
Reply Quote
38
doubledog
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AxelFoley85 • 1:35p, 6/14/26
AxelFoley85 said:
Holy crap if true. Outright treason.


Inside the imperial presidency of Donald Trump. If that is not a biased hit piece book, I will eat my hat.
Reply Quote
85
AxelFoley85
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jt2hunt • 1:36p, 6/14/26
It's not and someone should be punished to the absolute max.
Reply Quote
43
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jt2hunt • 1:39p, 6/14/26
AG
jt2hunt said:
How's that legal?

This goes back to WaPo publishing The Pentagon Papers after Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office was burglarized The crime was the theft which WaPo had no direct involvement.

So, did these two reporters request or know in advance that the security was being breached? If so, they become accessories.
Reply Quote
32
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:42p, 6/14/26
It's way past time to put people in prison for life. This is not legal opposition.
Reply Quote
114
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 1:44p, 6/14/26
aggiehawg said:
jt2hunt said:
How's that legal?

This goes back to WaPo publishing The Pentagon Papers after Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office was burglarized The crime was the theft which WaPo had no direct involvement.

So, did these two reporters request or know in advance that the security was being breached? If so, they become accessories.
IANAL
If true the people who leaked the information are still liable and if found guilty should serve long prison sentences?
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
Reply Quote
12
YouBet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:45p, 6/14/26
AG
The Imperial Presidency. Lol.

You mean the guy that's arguably destroying if not at least degrading Bretton Woods?

Leftist clowns.
Reply Quote
44
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 1:49p, 6/14/26
AG
Yes. And it should not be that hard to find out who breached security. (Unless they are looking for Hunter's cocaine stash, of course.)

What got Assange in trouble was not releasing classified info, it was that he did some work to help Manning to break an encryption code to help him/her to gain access to it. Without that direct involvement, he would nothave been charged.
Reply Quote
22
1 edit
EFR
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:50p, 6/14/26
By saying the admin saying they think the reporters have tapes they are essentially saying that the book is true. This definitely makes it worth reading.
Reply Quote
11
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jt2hunt • 1:51p, 6/14/26
AG
jt2hunt said:
How's that legal?

Subpoena them and demand that they give up the source of the classified information.

I know there may be 1st Amendment issues on this, but if you or I KNOWINGLY accepted classified information and/or released it to the public, we would go to jail for sure. It's essentially the same as knowingly accepting stolen merchandise.

Freedom of the press shouldn't be allowed to involve committing illegal acts.

You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
33
1 edit
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 1:52p, 6/14/26
AG
richardag said:
aggiehawg said:
jt2hunt said:
How's that legal?

This goes back to WaPo publishing The Pentagon Papers after Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office was burglarized The crime was the theft which WaPo had no direct involvement.

So, did these two reporters request or know in advance that the security was being breached? If so, they become accessories.

IANAL
If true the people who leaked the information are still liable and if found guilty should serve long prison sentences?

Yes. They are liable and they need to be found and prosecuted.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
16
BkYdPitmaster
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EFR • 1:55p, 6/14/26
AG
EFR said:
By saying the admin saying they think the reporters have tapes they are essentially saying that the book is true. This definitely makes it worth reading.

My guess is the admin knows exactly who it was…and said leaker is probably leaking in his/her pants right about now.
Backyard Pitmaster
Reply Quote
15
rocky the dog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:55p, 6/14/26
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Reply Quote
67
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EFR • 1:56p, 6/14/26
AG
EFR said:
By saying the admin saying they think the reporters have tapes they are essentially saying that the book is true. This definitely makes it worth reading.

Well, the authors will definitely make sure to warp whatever was said in them to ensure that Orange Man Bad, so matter what.

I guess if you want to read a book that distorts reality, feel free to.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Reply Quote
26
pollo hermanos
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:59p, 6/14/26
AG
There are clearly some leakers in this crew. Their article a couple months ago about the lead to Iran had very specific details. The most common theory was that it was Vance's crew.
Reply Quote
8
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 2:02p, 6/14/26
aggiehawg said:
Yes. And it should not be that hard to find out who breached security. (Unless they are looking for Hunter's cocaine stash, of course.)

What got Assange in trouble was not releasing classified info, it was that he did some work to help Manning to break an encryption code to help him/her to gain access to it. Without that direct involvement, he would nothave been charged.
Thamks for the clarity.
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
Reply Quote
2
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 2:04p, 6/14/26
Ag with kids said:
richardag said:
aggiehawg said:
jt2hunt said:
How's that legal?

This goes back to WaPo publishing The Pentagon Papers after Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office was burglarized The crime was the theft which WaPo had no direct involvement.

So, did these two reporters request or know in advance that the security was being breached? If so, they become accessories.

IANAL
If true the people who leaked the information are still liable and if found guilty should serve long prison sentences?

Yes. They are liable and they need to be found and prosecuted.
Thank you for the response much appreciated.
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
Reply Quote
4
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:13p, 6/14/26
This book is basically going to be the 2027 blueprint for the Democrats' articles of impeachment.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
4
Hardcore Greg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:25p, 6/14/26
"Imperial Presidency"? The last MF issued an unconstitutional decree to fire anyone who would not take an experimental vaccine that they didn't need…one which he was warning against just months prior, when politically convenient for him.

Accuse the opposition of that which you are actually guilty: Tale as old as time.
Reply Quote
60
AlexNguyen
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BkYdPitmaster • 2:30p, 6/14/26
BkYdPitmaster said:
EFR said:
By saying the admin saying they think the reporters have tapes they are essentially saying that the book is true. This definitely makes it worth reading.

My guess is the admin knows exactly who it was…and said leaker is probably leaking in his/her pants right about now.

Believe it when I see it. Other than the Brennan and Bolton cases which are still very much in process, the Trump DOJ has pretty much shot duds on bringing any conspirators to justice.
Reply Quote
9
BadMoonRisin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:49p, 6/14/26
AG
Hang somebody for once or throw them in jail for 30 years and this all stops immediately.
i'm sorry i dont laugh at the right times.
Reply Quote
21
2 edits
Pacifico
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jt2hunt • 2:59p, 6/14/26
AG
jt2hunt said:
How's that legal?

Communist must have access to our most secure information to manufacture believable disinformation. They don't care if it's legal or not.
Reply Quote
9
DeschutesAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 3:00p, 6/14/26
Ellis Wyatt said:
It's way past time to put people in prison for life. This is not legal opposition.
First Trump must identify who his real opposition is. Trump keeps siccing his DOJ on Democrats. That has been a waste of time and resources.

From 2015 to today, it is the Establishment Rs who have BY FAR been Trump's most formidable and effective MAIN opposition. They have stymied, blocked, and undermined Trump for the entire 5.5 years he has been in power as POTUS.

There were no Democrats in the Situation Room meetings. Only senior level Rs.
Reply Quote
17
doubledog
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BkYdPitmaster • 3:03p, 6/14/26
BkYdPitmaster said:
EFR said:
By saying the admin saying they think the reporters have tapes they are essentially saying that the book is true. This definitely makes it worth reading.

My guess is the admin knows exactly who it was…and said leaker is probably leaking in his/her pants right about now.

This is not like Hunter leaving his cocaine in a Whitehouse locker. Daddy/Step Mommy can't protect the leaker(s).
Reply Quote
4
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to pollo hermanos • 3:08p, 6/14/26
pollo hermanos said:
There are clearly some leakers in this crew. Their article a couple months ago about the lead to Iran had very specific details. The most common theory was that it was Vance's crew.

It's JD Vance and his team.

anyone think it was just coincidence that BUCKLEY CARLSON, the son of Nazi Tucker Carlson was a senior figure in Vance's office?@?@
Reply Quote
3
BrazosDog02
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:16p, 6/14/26
AG
It's likely a non issue. Promoting a book is not unheard of. I've never heard of these people and up until a few minutes ago, I didn't even know the book existed. Ive never even heard of the X account that posted retweeted it. This thread alone probably generated hundreds of clicks, has wasted who knows how much bandwidth...and for what? An issue that no one knows is actually an issue.

I say they are bull****ting everyone.
Reply Quote
7
2 edits
MelvinUdall
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DeschutesAg • 3:17p, 6/14/26
DeschutesAg said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
It's way past time to put people in prison for life. This is not legal opposition.
First Trump must identify who his real opposition is. Trump keeps siccing his DOJ on Democrats. That has been a waste of time and resources.

From 2015 to today, it is the Establishment Rs who have BY FAR been Trump's most formidable and effective MAIN opposition. They have stymied, blocked, and undermined Trump for the entire 5.5 years he has been in power as POTUS.

There were no Democrats in the Situation Room meetings. Only senior level Rs.


I don't care if it was Republicans or Democrats, and I don't care who the President is, whoever did this needs to be in jail along with the journalists…this really isn't this difficult.
Reply Quote
8
HTownAg98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MelvinUdall • 3:25p, 6/14/26
MelvinUdall said:
DeschutesAg said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
It's way past time to put people in prison for life. This is not legal opposition.
First Trump must identify who his real opposition is. Trump keeps siccing his DOJ on Democrats. That has been a waste of time and resources.

From 2015 to today, it is the Establishment Rs who have BY FAR been Trump's most formidable and effective MAIN opposition. They have stymied, blocked, and undermined Trump for the entire 5.5 years he has been in power as POTUS.

There were no Democrats in the Situation Room meetings. Only senior level Rs.


I don't care if it was Republicans or Democrats, and I don't care who the President is, whoever did this needs to be in jail along with the journalists…this really isn't this difficult.

Sort of. The leakers are in big trouble. The journalists are in the clear if they didn't solicit the leak. See NYT V. US.
Reply Quote
5
Bucketrunner
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BadMoonRisin • 3:39p, 6/14/26
BadMoonRisin said:
Hang somebody for once or throw them in jail for 30 years and this all stops immediately.
Reply Quote
2
MelvinUdall
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HTownAg98 • 3:49p, 6/14/26
HTownAg98 said:
MelvinUdall said:
DeschutesAg said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
It's way past time to put people in prison for life. This is not legal opposition.
First Trump must identify who his real opposition is. Trump keeps siccing his DOJ on Democrats. That has been a waste of time and resources.

From 2015 to today, it is the Establishment Rs who have BY FAR been Trump's most formidable and effective MAIN opposition. They have stymied, blocked, and undermined Trump for the entire 5.5 years he has been in power as POTUS.

There were no Democrats in the Situation Room meetings. Only senior level Rs.


I don't care if it was Republicans or Democrats, and I don't care who the President is, whoever did this needs to be in jail along with the journalists…this really isn't this difficult.

Sort of. The leakers are in big trouble. The journalists are in the clear if they didn't solicit the leak. See NYT V. US.


That is fair…but, this is where I am not knowledgeable, but if they took that information without verifying what it was from, is there no culpability? I mean they have their source/s, but don't they have to clarify where this info is from? Like I said, I am not lawyer at all.
Reply Quote
Bunk Moreland
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:52p, 6/14/26
Trump loves Maggie for some odd reason. He fed her info during his entire first term. And I'm sure hell love this book and how it frames him as a king. Feeds the ego.
Reply Quote
2
Hardcore Greg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HTownAg98 • 3:57p, 6/14/26
HTownAg98 said:
MelvinUdall said:
DeschutesAg said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
It's way past time to put people in prison for life. This is not legal opposition.
First Trump must identify who his real opposition is. Trump keeps siccing his DOJ on Democrats. That has been a waste of time and resources.

From 2015 to today, it is the Establishment Rs who have BY FAR been Trump's most formidable and effective MAIN opposition. They have stymied, blocked, and undermined Trump for the entire 5.5 years he has been in power as POTUS.

There were no Democrats in the Situation Room meetings. Only senior level Rs.


I don't care if it was Republicans or Democrats, and I don't care who the President is, whoever did this needs to be in jail along with the journalists…this really isn't this difficult.

Sort of. The leakers are in big trouble. The journalists are in the clear if they didn't solicit the leak. See NYT V. US.


What if the reporters knew it was illegally obtained but didn't exactly solicit it? Genuinely curious.

At the very least any ethical company should fire someone for something like this imo.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Last Page
Page 1 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.