DOJ vs the New Scums

2,868 Views | 26 Replies | Last: 9 days ago by nortex97
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.newsweek.com/newsom-trump-doj-investigation-claims-retaliation-presidential-run-12075441

Gov New Scum is whining that the DOJ is sniffing around he and his wife's finances and digging through years of banking records. Is this about the millions in charity money New Scum funneled to his wife's gender equality "non-profit?"

https://nypost.com/2026/03/10/us-news/gavin-newsom-funnels-over-4m-into-wifes-nonprofit-california-partners-project/
BkYdPitmaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They shouldn't be sniffing around his wife's anything.
Backyard Pitmaster
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Doge his ass
I hope I did not offend anybody with this post. If I did, please come see me at my address in my profile so we can talk.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure why he is whining... the investigation began under Biden.
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If he has done nothing wrong, he should have nothing to fear, right dems?
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Owlagdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

Not sure why he is whining... the investigation began under Biden.

Democrat base are pinheads and foreigners. Newsome likes money and nice things. They don't like him.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How does someone like this have any relationships at all? There is zero truth in him. None!

Quote:

California Gov. Newsom says he and his wife are under investigation by DOJ at President Trump's direction



flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The guy is a phony, he is literally dumb, he has zero morals, and he's a raging alcoholic who has never been accountable in his life.

Surely he's always by the books.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seriously, the arrogance of this absolute piece of **** is just astounding. We're used to seeing a lot of this with Democrats with this guy is literally leading his state into hell actively pursuing avenues to continue voter, cheating and prevent people from looking into it and then has the audacity to be upset because they're looking into his finances?

I feel sorry for their kids. These two people are absolute pieces of *****

I don’t get enough credit for the things I manage not to say.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TyHolden said:

Doge his ass

Doge is dead. Pretty sure all forms of it are extinct now. Turns out politicians love spending and printing.
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hmm, if only we had some track record of Gavin thinking the rules don't apply to him.
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rocky the dog said:




This should be all the DOJ need. Despicable.

Go down the list D and R and you'd find 99.999% of them are living like this. Shrink the government!
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Dems opened up Pandora's box with the Trump law fare. We'll all live to regret it
oldord
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When they went through Trump's underwear drawer, there's nothing they can say that will justify them not being investigated
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Governor Gavin Newsom and the Democrats are complaining because they think President Trump has weaponized the DOJ against them. Screw them all!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Logos Stick said:

Not sure why he is whining... the investigation began under Biden.

Correct. And it's already led to some results.

As any Californian should know, where there's smoke there's fire.

This chatter about his cash flow has been ongoing for a while now. The Newsoms, as well as the people's republic of California seem to have a real spending problem:
Quote:

The Newsoms still carry a $2,695,000 mortgage on the Fair Oaks home; the payments for that mortgage are over $13,000 a month. While Newsom's wineries have been successful, those assets have been in a blind trust since 2018, and the couple's total annual income has averaged $1.4 million. Out of that, the couple paid an average of $450,000/year in total taxes and $200,000/year to domestic workers according to tax returns reviewed, in addition to property taxes, private school tuition, and mortgages, not to mention all of the other costs of maintaining a home and raising four children, bringing their total known expenditures to more than their average total annual income.

Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

The guy is a phony, he is literally dumb, he has zero morals, and he's a raging alcoholic who has never been accountable in his life.

Surely he's always by the books.

Yes. He is dumb. Remember, he told a bunch of black folks that he's dumb, just like they are.
LOL OLD
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But we were told on this site that he would be a lock to win the presidency because he is good looking, and women only vote for good looking men.

Does this mean that women are not smart enough to vote based upon qualifications and experience?

Does it mean that Joe Biden is considered exceptionally good looking by women because he "won" the election with a record number of votes.

Does that mean that women consider old, senile, corrupt men to be good looking?

I feel bad for young single men. They don't have a chance for getting dates when we have so many old senile corrupt men roaming the streets.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sid Farkas said:

The Dems opened up Pandora's box with the Trump law fare. We'll all live to regret it

Been saying it forever. Leftists are the shallowest, most shortsighted simps on the planet. They have been conditioned to having no critical thinking skills and can't see the obvious consequences ahead for their actions. It's an ideology that is made for, and attracts the stupid, except of course for a few of the truly evil elites that understand the game and run the show with intent for perpetual power.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charge them, arrest them, and prosecute them. They did it to our president so we can do it to their ****bird governor.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I actually think Newsom is not anywhere near as smart as the Dems are hoping.

Not that intelligence matters to them. I believe the last Potus nomnee/office holder on their side to even hold an above average IQ was likely Clinton, and I wouldn't put him in a top tier. They vote for personas and image.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Friggin' California. Someone should ask Talarico if he would favor similar legislation for Texas.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGHouston11 said:

TyHolden said:

Doge his ass

Doge is dead. Pretty sure all forms of it are extinct now. Turns out politicians love spending and printing.

Is the investigation of SPLC at all in your mind tied to Doge?
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I actually think Newsom is not anywhere near as smart as the Dems are hoping.

Not that intelligence matters to them. I believe the last Potus nomnee/office holder on their side to even hold an above average IQ was likely Clinton, and I wouldn't put him in a top tier. They vote for personas and image.

What is Newsome hiding behind related to not releasing his communications?

Executive privilege? Something that should be in place for the governor of California but not POTUS?

What a maroon.
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

AGHouston11 said:

TyHolden said:

Doge his ass

Doge is dead. Pretty sure all forms of it are extinct now. Turns out politicians love spending and printing.

Is the investigation of SPLC at all in your mind tied to Doge?

They only care about DOGE concerning bashing it because a) orange man bad; and b) they want it to go away as it hurts their money laundering and election engineering.

They certainly don't care about spending.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
More troubles for Gavin:

She's an outstanding investigator.
Quote:

There are some exemptions, but Newsom isn't even following the law related to his denial of the CPRA request. The CPRA requires officials/agencies to clearly state which exemption applies to the records requested; the presumption is that all public records - including those that might be on private accounts or devices - are to be produced unless the agency/official can clearly articulate which exemption applies and why. Newsom doesn't even do that, but asks the DOJ to do so.

And, the California Constitution was amended in 2004 by the voters (Proposition 59) to add the "Sunshine" amendment, which adds this right to know as a foundational principle:
Quote:

The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business, and, therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies shall be open to public scrutiny.

This isn't the first time Newsom's office has refused to provide records to the press. In fact, it would be news if Newsom's administration actually complied with a CPRA request. Usually, though, he just claims that the information requested could jeopardize his or his family's safety; for example, his office refused to produce records related to how much state funding went to pay for his security detail when he visited Montana when the state was on California's no-go list for state-funded travel because its policies were insufficiently woke. Then, when he knew he couldn't weasel out of the issue, he claimed that there was a public safety exemption to the no-go law.

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.