infinity ag said:

---

Remember this super-lib hottie who flashed Charlie Kirk and Vivek Ramaswamy on their tours? That was in 2024.
Her name is Emily Jean Whiteford.
On the left is her in 2024. On the right is her in 2026.


It's really her, the internet did its research.
What happened??? Liberalism and Wokeism happened.
Liberalism is a disease, stay away.

Now listen to her speak.

WARNING: NSFW language.

The same woman who sexually assaulted Charlie Kirk, looking much worse for wear, confronts @TRussHunter of @AbolitionRising over his anti-abortion stance, makes a joke about Kirk's neck hole, then makes impossibly bad arguments for abortion, embarrassing herself in the process. pic.twitter.com/V101rFgolS

— Protestia (@Protestia) June 19, 2026

This is when she was a hottie talking to Charlie (boob blurred)

Charlie Kirk had the discipline of a monk. You could wave chaos, cleavage, or communism in front of him and he’d still stay locked on target. Man was immune to distractions. pic.twitter.com/hhIw29S8El

— Ian Miles Cheong (@ianmiles) September 17, 2025

---

Ryan Long is not wrong.

Chicks Flashing Their Tits for Activism pic.twitter.com/qwyJe174dT

— Ryan Long (@ryanlongcomedy) December 18, 2024

You can do a similar before/after with Bridget Fonda, but the difference is thirty years.

Hank the Grifter said:

---

Alright y'all. I can't stand these crazy liberal white women either. They're the WORST.

That stated, I'm not going to consider anything you say credible if it's preceded by the argument that flashing your boobs at a grown man is sexual assault.

Sorry but that's just asinine.

---

It is a crime; indecent exposure. If a man flashes his *****, then same charge; BUT, if he threatens to harm another with his exposed *****, it is assault in SOME jurisdictions; for example, in Louisiana, flashing a ***** OR BOOB might warrant classification as "assault" if the ***** OR BOOB is used as a threat of harm, while "battery" is when physical contact is made. Texas doesn't draw this distinction, as 'assault/ battery' are used interchangeably. Additionally, "assault" could rise to "battery" in jurisdictions where there's a distinction between these words, as well as states where such isn't made, IF the 'threat' manifests physical harm, such as nausea, PTSD, nightmares, panic attack, etc. SO, try not to be so dismissive if you don't realize there exists certain nuance when "assault" is used; although I agree 'assault' made herein might not be factually/ legally correct, I don't know how Pennsylvania classifies non-physical contact vs. a threat with no physical contact that manifests physiological responses/ symptoms vs. a "physical contact" requirement.

The only drug she should be taking is a GLP-1

torrid said:

---

Face doesn't even look the same.

---

It's her; same tattoo.

In Texas that is DOC all day every day, indecent exposure has to have the element of sexual gratification. As it was obviously some sort of misguided protest it doesn't meet the elements. Additionally Texas doesn't use "battery" interchangeably like you said, just assault.

That poor girl should have never walked through that Ugly Forest. She obviously found every branch on every tree. Bless her heart.

Burrus86 said:

---

That poor girls should have never walked through that Ugly Forest. She obviously found every branch on every tree. Bless her heart.

---

I can't get over it haha. Before, she at least had a strong jaw line, a good body and small waist. She thought she could maybe catch somebody sneaking a peak.

Now? NOBODY wants to see any of that. She has absolutely nothing going well for her to make up for her crazy leftism

In the words of the great Ron White, "You can't fix stupid."

But being fat and stupid is a bad combo. At least before she might be able to get by on looks. Now she is just stupid

Squadron7 said:

---

Given this new information I have decided I can no longer fix her.

---

LMAO, awesome!

Liberalism is bad for your health.

Ag in Tiger Country said:

---

Hank the Grifter said:

---

Alright y'all. I can't stand these crazy liberal white women either. They're the WORST.

That stated, I'm not going to consider anything you say credible if it's preceded by the argument that flashing your boobs at a grown man is sexual assault.

Sorry but that's just asinine.

---

It is a crime; indecent exposure. If a man flashes his *****, then same charge; BUT, if he threatens to harm another with his exposed *****, it is assault in SOME jurisdictions; for example, in Louisiana, flashing a ***** OR BOOB might warrant classification as "assault" if the ***** OR BOOB is used as a threat of harm, while "battery" is when physical contact is made. Texas doesn't draw this distinction, as 'assault/ battery' are used interchangeably. Additionally, "assault" could rise to "battery" in jurisdictions where there's a distinction between these words, as well as states where such isn't made, IF the 'threat' manifests physical harm, such as nausea, PTSD, nightmares, panic attack, etc. SO, try not to be so dismissive if you don't realize there exists certain nuance when "assault" is used; although I agree 'assault' made herein might not be factually/ legally correct, I don't know how Pennsylvania classifies non-physical contact vs. a threat with no physical contact that manifests physiological responses/ symptoms vs. a "physical contact" requirement.

---

Assault and battery are not used interchangeably in Texas. It's just assault

EFR said:

---

In Texas that is DOC all day every day, indecent exposure has to have the element of sexual gratification. As it was obviously some sort of misguided protest it doesn't meet the elements. Additionally Texas doesn't use "battery" interchangeably like you said, just assault.

---

"Indecent Exposure" in Texas doesn't include breasts. Neither does 42.01 "Disorderly Conduct"

Both require exposure of anus or genitals

Boobs don't count

Ag in Tiger Country said:

---

Hank the Grifter said:

---

Alright y'all. I can't stand these crazy liberal white women either. They're the WORST.

That stated, I'm not going to consider anything you say credible if it's preceded by the argument that flashing your boobs at a grown man is sexual assault.

Sorry but that's just asinine.

---

It is a crime; indecent exposure. If a man flashes his *****, then same charge; BUT, if he threatens to harm another with his exposed *****, it is assault in SOME jurisdictions; for example, in Louisiana, flashing a ***** OR BOOB might warrant classification as "assault" if the ***** OR BOOB is used as a threat of harm, while "battery" is when physical contact is made. Texas doesn't draw this distinction, as 'assault/ battery' are used interchangeably. Additionally, "assault" could rise to "battery" in jurisdictions where there's a distinction between these words, as well as states where such isn't made, IF the 'threat' manifests physical harm, such as nausea, PTSD, nightmares, panic attack, etc. SO, try not to be so dismissive if you don't realize there exists certain nuance when "assault" is used; although I agree 'assault' made herein might not be factually/ legally correct, I don't know how Pennsylvania classifies non-physical contact vs. a threat with no physical contact that manifests physiological responses/ symptoms vs. a "physical contact" requirement.

---

I've never considered the possibility of being bludgeoned to death by boobs, but IMHO there are worse ways to go.

Hatred adversely affects your appearance. Individuals who are happy tend to be inherently attractive.

Which is why you use gesture if it really causes a problem, or don't be a Karen and find better things to take someone to jail for.

That "woman" was probably tossed around at the ANTIFA campgrounds to get that so worn out so quickly

Based on the soy boys in antifa I doubt they could toss her. She would sit on them and make them scream.