***Week One Start/Sit/Waivers***

10,915 Views | 259 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Iraq2xVeteran
Silvertaps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prescott or Goff?

I'm feeling like Prescott may not have a great day against that Browns Dline.
RooAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not sure I agree. White finished 4th last year in points if I recall and haven't seen a non-PPR preseason ranking that has Mixon ahead of White. But it's fantasy, so who knows. It's all liquor and guessing.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Goff is the safe play -- always is at Ford Field

O/U for Dallas-Cleveland around 42 points -- fairly low total

I suspect Dak will be throwing a lot and turning it over a few times
mAgnoliAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wife's team Pick 2 PPR WR2 and Flex

Stefon Diggs @ IND
DK Metcalf vs. DEN
Jerome Ford vs. DAL

Have diggs and metcalf in but hate benching all those guaranteed touches on Jerome ford.
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jacobs, Mixon, Walker
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Diggs DK for sure
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the big man rumbles in for the first TD of the year
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
21-yard TD run for Xavier Worthy
txagman1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting first quarter stat:

Kelce + Andrews combined - 0/0/0 on 0 targets.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

21-yard TD run for Xavier Worthy

That kid is "holy sh!!t" fast!
txagman1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know it's the first game and Lamar's an athletic player, but the Ravens can't have him carrying the ball 8 times a half, even if he has mostly avoided any big hits. That amount of running by a QB isn't sustainable over a full season as eventually the big hits will come.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TD run for Pacheco
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
has Likely taken over for Andrews?

107 yards & TD
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh my, Worthy hits paydirt again

35-yard TD
mAgnoliAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guess Isaiah likely is the new mark andrews. Glad I don't have any shares of Andrews. Too bad I have Kelce. But I'm playing against Andrews
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Andrews!
txagman1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They are running a lot of 12 personnel. Given their offensive line issues, it won't surprise me if Andrews gets used more as an inline blocking TE with Likely the receiving TE. That will take away targets from Andrews and the secondary receivers (Bateman and Agholor). Will be interesting to see what happens when the defenses adjust and give more focus to Likely.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why in the world did Baltimore not spike the ball after the long gain?
gambochaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Holy crap out of bounds by half an inch
suburban cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Man I was hoping that was a broken collarbone or something and then the guy almost snags a second tuddy
WestTexAg12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chiefs are the luckiest damn team.

God I hate them.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lamar Jackson needs to go ahead and change his name to Patrick Mahomes' *****.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fantasy-wise Lamar ran for 120 to post a nice stat line

Mahomes...similar to last year...not throwing TD's like he used to -- just 1 tonight

Kelce and Andrews bust
txagman1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For future reference:

Ravens targets
12 - TE Likely
10 - WR Flowers
8 - RB Hill
5 - WR Bateman
2 - TE Andrews
2 - RB Henry
1 - WR Agholor

Chiefs targets
9 - WR Rice
4 - TE Kelce
3 - WR Worthy
3 - TE Gray
3 - RB Pacheco
2 - RB Perine
1 - WR Watson
1 - WR Smith-Schuster
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sell high on Pachecho if you can, I hard faded RB's overdrafted on usage over talent like him and White
Perine would put up huge numbers as the starter
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EliteZags said:

sell high on Pachecho if you can, I hard faded RB's overdrafted on usage over talent like him and White
Perine would put up huge numbers as the starter
+1 If Worthy is going to be used like he was last night, Pacheco might only be a guy at the goal line.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Likely is only 25% owned in yahoo leagues... still have all the other games to go, but he'll Likely be the #1 waiver add next week.


i got good points from Rashee last night, negated by the disappearance of Mark Andrews.. oof.
txagman1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, Likely will definitely be near or at the top of the waiver wire list next week. Great game for Worthy, but I would bet that a lot of his managers had him on the bench except in deep leagues. Will be interesting to see his role moving forward as it will be hard to replicate yesterday's performance without more touches.

Seems like the big winner was Rachee Rice, especially in Full PPR formats. And it looks like Derrick Henry will be very game script dependent. He should be okay in games the Ravens have a lead in, but when they are trailing, he will cede snaps to Justice Hill. At least he had the early touchdown yesterday.

Finally, Lamar put up video game numbers, but 16 carries in a game is not sustainable for a QB without increased injury risk. He's improved over the years in avoiding tackles, but eventually a defender will try and land a big hit.
txagman1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FYI, injury updates…





Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I have Mark Andrews and am very curious to see how that situation plays out moving forward.

Fantasy guys on social media are talking about the Chiefs defense really keying in on him and focusing on taking him out of the game, so maybe this is a one off, but then again he had tight rope surgery last November and was apparently involved in a major car wreck, so who knows if he wasn't 100%.



I feel like people are going to be adding Likely expecting him to be the new TE1 when this will probably be his best game of the year.
txagman1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting. If the Chiefs defensive strategy was "don't let Andrews beat us", technically it worked, but they almost got burned by Likely putting up a 9/111/1 line on 12 targets. I would assume defenses will make the proper adjustment. This could lead to a 1/1A situation where both TEs can get touches moving forward.

My concern is regarding Zay Flowers. He put up a 6/37/0 line on 10 targets. The 6.2 YPR was less than not only Likely and Bateman, but also than Hill and Andrews. If Flowers is going to be primarily used on short area targets, that is really going to cap his big play/TD upside.
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Flowers' line looks meh on paper but there were 2 deep misses and the last botched open TD, 1 or 2 of those connect and the narrative completely flips
10 targets is encouraging
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the fantasy pundits are really down on Dak at Cleveland

is Trevor Lawrence vs. Miami a viable alternative?
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EliteZags said:

Flowers' line looks meh on paper but there were 2 deep misses and the last botched open TD, 1 or 2 of those connect and the narrative completely flips
10 targets is encouraging
This was pretty much the exact same story for Zay Flowers all of last year. So close to having big games, just a couple bad throws/drops away...
E
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
With Jamar Chase as questionable, pick 2:

Nacua @ DET
Kirk @ MIA
J. Palmer vs LV
Singleary vs MIN


Leaning Nacua & Kirk
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.