Steam Machine is Back!

2,181 Views | 30 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Lathspell
Pman17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RIP Xbox, PS, Nintendo, and Meta.

Steam is releasing a console that looks like half of an Xbox Series X with an Alexa LED bar. 6X more powerful than the steam deck.

They also announced a new steam controller with the Steam Deck control form factor.

And… a VR headset

Coming 2026



https://store.steampowered.com/sale/steammachine?l=english
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
With as bad as Windows is getting... Kinda into it. Was redoing my PC in the Spring so... might just slip this into my budget!
AggiEE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Specs are extremely weak on the GPU and RAM, and they said the price isn't going to be like a console but a PC, meaning you're going get less than PS5 performance for more than PS5 cost.

If you want a console…just get a PS5…. If you want a PC this may be an ok choice if you're looking for a very budget based system with minimal ability to customize

Otherwise this is going to be extremely niche just like the first time they tried it
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They tried this in 2014 and it failed miserably, but now i see they are using proprietary desktop GPUs instead of mobile laptop GPUs.

We will see how that goes, I guess.

Their biggest competitive advantage is the large steam libraries that people already have that they want to play on their couches, and that is no small thing. Games are cheaper and more co op friendly and most people might buy this just to play the games they already have. They dont need massive Killer Aps or exclusives anymore to sell the consoles at a loss and make hay on the games.

With XBOX and PS giving up their exclusivity, I can see how this is more appealing this time around.
heddleston
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Surprised the ram is so low, 16gb is what's in the steam deck. I'm assuming they had to cut that to keep costs down since RAM prices are nuts right now. Hopefully that is upgradable.

I'm pretty interested in this. I love my SteamDeck. I'm generally not interested in 4k or the latest and greatest AAA games (Sonic Racing Crossworlds and NCAA 25 are the only AAA games Ive bought at launch since maybe the Wii was still the new hotness), but would like something that could be my home media center and play my steam/gog/epic library and retro games on the couch.

Running a different Linux distribution like Bazzite or CachyOS would give it an extra boost, but only if I decided to use it for home PC stuff(steam os can't print!)
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm in. I am absolutely the target demo for these. Haven't been excited for new hardware in a loooong time. LFG!

ETA: Seriously think I am probably going to be getting all three, pending launch reviews of course. Stream from the GabeCube to the Frame while I play with the controller. Valve stacking W's, as usual.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ram and storage are upgradable. Sodimm ram slots, full size NVMe slots.
kb2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

They tried this in 2014 and it failed miserably, but now i see they are using proprietary desktop GPUs instead of mobile laptop GPUs.

We will see how that goes, I guess.

Their biggest competitive advantage is the large steam libraries that people already have that they want to play on their couches, and that is no small thing. Games are cheaper and more co op friendly and most people might buy this just to play the games they already have. They dont need massive Killer Aps or exclusives anymore to sell the consoles at a loss and make hay on the games.

With XBOX and PS giving up their exclusivity, I can see how this is more appealing this time around.

It's a different environment than in 2014. Steam has spearheaded efforts for a long time to get more games running on linux, to the point where anti-cheat is about the only thing that holds back games from working on release day. With the success of the Steamdeck, this isn't so far out there in people's minds. I think you've already called out the big appeal, putting the massive steam libraries people already have on the TV easily is pretty appealing.
Pman17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At some point, I will phase out my gaming PC. I just don't play it enough now that I got older. I'm either handheld or console on a comfy couch. These console PC hybrids will keep my Steam library going without having to pay $500 here and there for PC components. Also I just hate using Windows as a Mac user.
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I play plenty of PC games and have my PC hooked up to my TV with an Xbox controller. I get the same couch experience at better graphics.

I completely get the desire as an older gamer to not sit at a desk in your evenings after spending all day working. But I always roll my eyes when people talk about that experience as the reason they don't play PC games.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
kb2001 said:

BadMoonRisin said:

They tried this in 2014 and it failed miserably, but now i see they are using proprietary desktop GPUs instead of mobile laptop GPUs.

We will see how that goes, I guess.

Their biggest competitive advantage is the large steam libraries that people already have that they want to play on their couches, and that is no small thing. Games are cheaper and more co op friendly and most people might buy this just to play the games they already have. They dont need massive Killer Aps or exclusives anymore to sell the consoles at a loss and make hay on the games.

With XBOX and PS giving up their exclusivity, I can see how this is more appealing this time around.

It's a different environment than in 2014. Steam has spearheaded efforts for a long time to get more games running on linux, to the point where anti-cheat is about the only thing that holds back games from working on release day. With the success of the Steamdeck, this isn't so far out there in people's minds. I think you've already called out the big appeal, putting the massive steam libraries people already have on the TV easily is pretty appealing.

I have a Steam Deck and I absolutely love it.

I work from home for the most part and spend enough time at in my office where my PC is. When I leave that space, I just want to relax. Having to come back to it to enjoy a hobby didnt hit like it used to . I dont know, Im interested.
AggiEE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kb2001 said:

BadMoonRisin said:

They tried this in 2014 and it failed miserably, but now i see they are using proprietary desktop GPUs instead of mobile laptop GPUs.

We will see how that goes, I guess.

Their biggest competitive advantage is the large steam libraries that people already have that they want to play on their couches, and that is no small thing. Games are cheaper and more co op friendly and most people might buy this just to play the games they already have. They dont need massive Killer Aps or exclusives anymore to sell the consoles at a loss and make hay on the games.

With XBOX and PS giving up their exclusivity, I can see how this is more appealing this time around.

It's a different environment than in 2014. Steam has spearheaded efforts for a long time to get more games running on linux, to the point where anti-cheat is about the only thing that holds back games from working on release day. With the success of the Steamdeck, this isn't so far out there in people's minds. I think you've already called out the big appeal, putting the massive steam libraries people already have on the TV easily is pretty appealing.


Steam Deck is still a niche device with only a few million sold. Nothing wrong with that. It provides value to those already invested in the ecosystem that want a handheld.

This will be much the same - for those already on Steam that perhaps want a cheaper entry point PC to connect to the TV and a little bit more streamlined.

But, not really going to pull any major numbers because the most streamlined version for TV play is already the consoles.

This may find slightly more success than the original Steam Machines (which was a big flop), but it won't do but a a fraction of what even the Xbox Series consoles sold.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, if I want to play any of my Steam library on my tv I have an older gaming laptop that is permanently hooked to the tv that I use that for. But I rarely use it.

Using Steam + PC vs Console + TV is based on game type for me more than anything.

Example: If I'm playing a top down CRPG type game, that's getting played on my PC sitting at desk. I don't see how anyone plays those types of game on the tv without sitting a foot from the tv.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggiEE said:

kb2001 said:

BadMoonRisin said:

They tried this in 2014 and it failed miserably, but now i see they are using proprietary desktop GPUs instead of mobile laptop GPUs.

We will see how that goes, I guess.

Their biggest competitive advantage is the large steam libraries that people already have that they want to play on their couches, and that is no small thing. Games are cheaper and more co op friendly and most people might buy this just to play the games they already have. They dont need massive Killer Aps or exclusives anymore to sell the consoles at a loss and make hay on the games.

With XBOX and PS giving up their exclusivity, I can see how this is more appealing this time around.

It's a different environment than in 2014. Steam has spearheaded efforts for a long time to get more games running on linux, to the point where anti-cheat is about the only thing that holds back games from working on release day. With the success of the Steamdeck, this isn't so far out there in people's minds. I think you've already called out the big appeal, putting the massive steam libraries people already have on the TV easily is pretty appealing.


Steam Deck is still a niche device with only a few million sold. Nothing wrong with that. It provides value to those already invested in the ecosystem that want a handheld.

This will be much the same - for those already on Steam that perhaps want a cheaper entry point PC to connect to the TV and a little bit more streamlined.

But, not really going to pull any major numbers because the most streamlined version for TV play is already the consoles.

This may find slightly more success than the original Steam Machines (which was a big flop), but it won't do but a a fraction of what even the Xbox Series consoles sold.


We shall see.
agdoc2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Steam Ouya. Neat.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
there is not going to be a huge market for a $800 machine that is weaker than the original PS5. The only case where this machine would excel - multiplayer shooters - is rendered moot due to it running Linux.
ArmyAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The VR headset intrigues me, but I have 2 issues:
1. What is the cost?
2. I have bought many games/ apps through Meta. What incintivises me to move over to Valve?
MGS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The headset is also ARM-based and Valve has added an x86->ARM translation layer to Proton. It looks very likely that we'll see an ARM Steamdeck 2 with much better battery life than the original.
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The VR headset looks freaking amazing. Not really interested in the steam device because my laptop is MUCH more powerful. But that VR headset looks absolutely amazing and seems to address the issues that lead to motion sickness.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ArmyAg2002 said:

The VR headset intrigues me, but I have 2 issues:
1. What is the cost?
2. I have bought many games/ apps through Meta. What incintivises me to move over to Valve?


Not sure about number one. But number two is easy.

It's not Meta. That should be reason enough.

Seriously though, Valves catalog of actual games is superior to anything else on the market. And nothing beats their several times a year sales. And Gabe Newell has proven over and over that he is customer first, developer friendly. Really don't think Meta can say the same. But in the end it comes down to cost for most I assume and how entrenched they are in a respective ecosystem.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Steam/games on Apple TV in 2-3 years.
MGS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hph6203 said:

Steam/games on Apple TV in 2-3 years.

No way Apple will let another app store on iOS or the AppleTV
FatZilla
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgDev01 said:

there is not going to be a huge market for a $800 machine that is weaker than the original PS5. The only case where this machine would excel - multiplayer shooters - is rendered moot due to it running Linux.

I think you are misjudging the target demographic. I doubt Steam cares about directly competing with super sweaty competitive gamers. Their strength is their massive catalog. Most of which won't need massive power. They are just open to all gamers, period. Like a modern Wii even. There is a marketable group of people that like slower cozier games that would never think to buy a PS5 or Xbox but would be open to something like this for the family room. I know several in fact.

And when crunching raw numbers, this won't be THAT far behind in total power. Even head to head in CPU. And all of that smooshed into a 6x6x6 box with the power brick inside as well. Pretty impressive. Then add on Gabe's passion for keeping everything completely open source and that gives it an edge for those who care about such things.

I'm not trying to blindly defend or white knight here. I honestly don't care about companies bottom lines and sales figures. Even Steams. But just saying we don't know yet how this will do. I just think there will probably be considerable interest.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lathspell said:

The VR headset looks freaking amazing. Not really interested in the steam device because my laptop is MUCH more powerful. But that VR headset looks absolutely amazing and seems to address the issues that lead to motion sickness.


Checked out a number of first reviews of it, and the overall reaction is extremely positive. Most were even blown away at how much better it is comparatively speaking to the direct competition as of now. And none of these reviewers are prone to over dramatization.

I'm hyped. I have been toying with the idea of getting into VR myself lately and this announcement came at the perfect time.

Only questionable variable is of course, the price.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Yeah, if I want to play any of my Steam library on my tv I have an older gaming laptop that is permanently hooked to the tv that I use that for. But I rarely use it.

Using Steam + PC vs Console + TV is based on game type for me more than anything.

Example: If I'm playing a top down CRPG type game, that's getting played on my PC sitting at desk. I don't see how anyone plays those types of game on the tv without sitting a foot from the tv.

It's funny you say this because I generally think the same, then I remember how I did exactly that with the original FF Tactics for multiple playthroughs with zero problems. And yet, still have a hard time thinking about doing it now. Just ingrained after so many hours sitting in front of the PC monitor I guess. Can't think outside that box now.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus said:

YouBet said:

Yeah, if I want to play any of my Steam library on my tv I have an older gaming laptop that is permanently hooked to the tv that I use that for. But I rarely use it.

Using Steam + PC vs Console + TV is based on game type for me more than anything.

Example: If I'm playing a top down CRPG type game, that's getting played on my PC sitting at desk. I don't see how anyone plays those types of game on the tv without sitting a foot from the tv.

It's funny you say this because I generally think the same, then I remember how I did exactly that with the original FF Tactics for multiple playthroughs with zero problems. And yet, still have a hard time thinking about doing it now. Just ingrained after so many hours sitting in front of the PC monitor I guess. Can't think outside that box now.


I simply can't see the menus or overlays in any detail these types of games typically have. I have to do it on PC.
AggiEE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eliminatus said:

AgDev01 said:

there is not going to be a huge market for a $800 machine that is weaker than the original PS5. The only case where this machine would excel - multiplayer shooters - is rendered moot due to it running Linux.

I think you are misjudging the target demographic. I doubt Steam cares about directly competing with super sweaty competitive gamers. Their strength is their massive catalog. Most of which won't need massive power. They are just open to all gamers, period. Like a modern Wii even. There is a marketable group of people that like slower cozier games that would never think to buy a PS5 or Xbox but would be open to something like this for the family room. I know several in fact.

And when crunching raw numbers, this won't be THAT far behind in total power. Even head to head in CPU. And all of that smooshed into a 6x6x6 box with the power brick inside as well. Pretty impressive. Then add on Gabe's passion for keeping everything completely open source and that gives it an edge for those who care about such things.

I'm not trying to blindly defend or white knight here. I honestly don't care about companies bottom lines and sales figures. Even Steams. But just saying we don't know yet how this will do. I just think there will probably be considerable interest.


Depends on how you define "considerable interest". I think it's like a Steam Deck situation, but even more niche. Steam Deck has sold a few million copies.

For Valve, that may be enough to justify. It's profitable and adds a new element to their ecosystem. But by the numbers, it's not a big seller.

The Xbox Series was seen as a failure and it sold 30M units, which is far more than the Steam Machines will sell; however, Steam obviously doesn't depend nearly as much on Steam Machines as its a side project.

This device mostly is appealing to those already invested in the Steam Ecosystem that don't otherwise have a more powerful PC, or to those that have a powerful PC but would want an adjacent device for the TV despite it being weaker.

This device is pretty decently behind in raw power. CPU isn't really the limiting factor. The GPU and RAM are considerably hamstrung in comparison to something like the PS5 or XSX and that's going to make a far bigger difference on visuals.

BUT, Valve knows that even this weaker piece of hardware is more powerful than MOST of their current audience. So there's plenty of PC users who could see this as a jumping point to upgrade. HOWEVER, given that I think this will end up being $700+ in price, at that point it makes you wonder why not just upgrade your PC in a few years when better cards are going to come out (2027). This thing is pretty ancient and dated, and will look even moreso by the time PS6 rolls out in two years.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've seen some other guesses from mainstream tech pubs that look at this at the $500-$650 range depending on storage etc. I think in that range it's definitely viable. At $700 or $750? Count me out. But at $500? I might be willing. Especially since I can upgrade my desktop and stream from there. I'm not going to be playing a bunch of FPS on this so my buy in there isn't as needy of super low input lag. Hogwarts or the like will be just fine. CE33 would be gorgeous streamed from my main desktop.

And then capable of running all the emulation stuff my wife would want locally or any karting or other stuff I'd play with the kids. I'm in on that.
Pman17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd say $499 for the 256GB model and $649 for the 2TB model. You're not paying for a screen and battery.
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The VR headset will be at LEAST $1,200 for the full package, is my guess.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.