Outdoors
Sponsored by

School Security

2,240 Views | 28 Replies | Last: 3 mo ago by InfantryAg
IndividualFreedom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was advised to bring this topic up in here....

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3566275/last

I've been on TA for a long time. Pretty much stay on Politics board...

Our large Houston area Private Christian School is interviewing security firms. I am looking for direction from someone who truly knows their stuff. School is talking about badges and tracking and doors blah blah blah...

Parents are catching wind of this non-sense and wanting armed LEO in the package. Reliable armed deadly force ability.

Where is my guy?
35chililights
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do you have any teachers that want to be qualified to carry? That's huge.

Our public school has a decent number of armed teachers and staff. With a big signs at the entrances stating such.

If you can't get faculty to follow protocol on locked doors on buildings, all the security in the world is a popcorn fart in the wind as far as usefulness.

agrams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the threat of a random teacher being armed and being able to fight back has to be a much larger deterrent than a shooter being able to identify the 1 armed guard, knowing if they take out the guard they have a clear path to do much more harm until other leo arrives.
PlayoffGhost1939
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Denton ISD went to armed security but requires an active TCOLE license so all of the folks they hired are recently required LEOs. The program is still relatively new but it's well received. The TEA requires armed presence in schools as well as weekly "door sweeps". Most districts are still trying to wrap their heads around this and that's why you're starting to see an uptick in ISDs creating their own police departments to make this work.

Milwaukees Best Light
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can have a big scary looking mofo posted at the main entrance of the school every day yall are open from 0700 til 1700 for $450,000 per school calendar year. You pick the gun he carries.
35chililights
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed. It's a classic example of unknown vs known.
O.G.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately, the school resource officer gig is often a "retirement job" or given to those that you wouldn't exactly take to a fight. Which, for the majority of the time, is probably ok, until it isn't.

Arming the teachers is great. But they need training, and often. I don't mean "requalifications" I mean training. Being able to punch paper while standing still makes for cool pictures but it isn't training.

The security guard/officer needs it as well & not just once a year.

There are several civillian companies out there that train school/church security teams. The USCCA is a good place to start. https://academy.usconcealedcarry.com/courses
It's not a be all/end all but its a good place to start.
agrams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree. While being legally able to carry as a staff member is good, I do think some advanced training on handling and preparedness would be a good investment. I have to think a few trainings through the year would cost less than a full time staff security officer.
FSGuide
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The head of your school should reach out to some of the larger districts in the area to see what security firm they use and get some recommendations. My district (Wylie ISD) has Wylie PD on site for the 2 high schools and a security company. Double doors with cameras for access etc. still have problems with kids and parents letting people in to be nice though.
zooguy96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
O.G. said:

Unfortunately, the school resource officer gig is often a "retirement job" or given to those that you wouldn't exactly take to a fight. Which, for the majority of the time, is probably ok, until it isn't.

Arming the teachers is great. But they need training, and often. I don't mean "requalifications" I mean training. Being able to punch paper while standing still makes for cool pictures but it isn't training.

The security guard/officer needs it as well & not just once a year.

There are several civillian companies out there that train school/church security teams. The USCCA is a good place to start. https://academy.usconcealedcarry.com/courses
It's not a be all/end all but its a good place to start.

Not at the schools I have worked in, but it is difficult to tell a trend.

At my last school of @ 700 we had 2 SRO's. One was a 6'8" former offensive lineman mid 20's who was in really good physical shape, and another was in his late 30's, good physical shape. They were both really good SRO's, and didn't take crap from anyone; administrators included.
I know a lot about a little, and a little about a lot.
O.G.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zooguy96 said:

O.G. said:

Unfortunately, the school resource officer gig is often a "retirement job" or given to those that you wouldn't exactly take to a fight. Which, for the majority of the time, is probably ok, until it isn't.

Arming the teachers is great. But they need training, and often. I don't mean "requalifications" I mean training. Being able to punch paper while standing still makes for cool pictures but it isn't training.

The security guard/officer needs it as well & not just once a year.

There are several civillian companies out there that train school/church security teams. The USCCA is a good place to start. https://academy.usconcealedcarry.com/courses
It's not a be all/end all but its a good place to start.

Not at the schools I have worked in, but it is difficult to tell a trend.

At my last school of @ 700 we had 2 SRO's. One was a 6'8" former offensive lineman mid 20's who was in really good physical shape, and another was in his late 30's, good physical shape. They were both really good SRO's, and didn't take crap from anyone; administrators included.

Those are good ones. I have seen a few when my kids were younger that were, shall we say, past their prime...
DiskoTroop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IndividualFreedom said:

I was advised to bring this topic up in here....

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3566275/last

I've been on TA for a long time. Pretty much stay on Politics board...

Our large Houston area Private Christian School is interviewing security firms. I am looking for direction from someone who truly knows their stuff. School is talking about badges and tracking and doors blah blah blah...

Parents are catching wind of this non-sense and wanting armed LEO in the package. Reliable armed deadly force ability.

Where is my guy?

I've spent a career in private (corporate) security managing security contracts. My email is in my profile. I'm happy to assist.
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Before going overboard and wasting a lot of money, according to Google....the odds of a student dying in a school shooting any give day is 1 in 614 million. It's less than the odds of winning the lottery. I don't know if these stats are totally accurate, but I do try to live life playing odds. We all do. I carry a weapon in the off chance I might need it being robbed at the bank all the while knowing I'm more likely to die in the car driving there.

Full disclosure, I am cynical because I dropped my kids off at private school with all manner of security that is listed in this thread, and I know after two days of observation, it wouldn't be overly difficult to harm a lot of kids if some lunatic had their mind set to it.
DiskoTroop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not about odds it's about assuring parents of safety.
HumpitPuryear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another thing to consider is whether your local police and fire/EMS can communicate from inside the building. This is something that is often overlooked until it's too late. You can ask them to come and do a survey with their radios. Cellular coverage is pretty important also. Much of the situational awareness in an emergency comes from civilians using their cell phones. If the coverage of either service is poor in the building I can recommend, design, and install solutions.
35chililights
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DiskoTroop said:

It's not about odds it's about placating parents concerns about safety.


FIFY

Any logical brain realizes it's never going to be zero risk. But we are not all logical brained humans.
It we were, we would realize that when our kids are at school, they are statistically at the safest place they will be during the 24 hours that are in a given day. And that includes them at our own homes.
ghollow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The school my wife works at has a number of ex-military teachers. I have always thought they would be great security if they were allowed to conceal carry.

Retired military folks would probably make good security guards as well.
So the greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced. It removes force from the equation... and that's why carrying a gun is a civilized act.
35chililights
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ghollow said:

The school my wife works at has a number of ex-military teachers. I have always thought they would be great security if they were allowed to conceal carry.

Retired military folks would probably make good security guards as well.


While I'd love to agree with you, some ex-military folks I've met are the worlds worst at the mindset needed for the protection of others. Some civilians are much more mentally equipped to fill that role.

I realize some bad apples in a bunch spoil the reputation of many good apples. All I'm saying is be careful extending leeway to all, based on some.

A better way to do it is based on the individual, deep background checks, and group training. This illuminates bad egos and general dipshlts in a group pretty quickly.
SGrem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dad's. Lots of them.

School district need to develop a qualification program for Dads. Rotate them in and out and have them patrol. Lots and lots of Dads would take their lunch hour or two a couple times a month to patrol the schools. Today's hybrid work environment gives a lot of Dads this opportunity.

Qualify them. Train them. Let them patrol!
Same for teachers that want to carry.
Www.gowithgrem.com
35chililights
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My kiddos elementary had this program. Background checked any dad that wanted to volunteer. Gave them all matching Tshirts. Had them check in with the office and signup for whatever slots they wanted to fill. Usually only two or three in any slot. Slots where for any hour from first bell to last.

Edited to add: these were NOT armed patrols. Just eyes on the campus, checking doors, walking the perimeter. That type thing.
Smeghead4761
How long do you want to ignore this user?
35chililights said:

Do you have any teachers that want to be qualified to carry? That's huge.

Our public school has a decent number of armed teachers and staff. With a big signs at the entrances stating such.

If you can't get faculty to follow protocol on locked doors on buildings, all the security in the world is a popcorn fart in the wind as far as usefulness.




Maintenance on security-related items, including and perhaps especially, door locks, is also very important. The Uvalde shooter was able to get into the building because the exterior door didn't lock properly (contrary to a rumor which circulated shortly after the attack, it was not propped open with a rock, although a teacher had gone in and out shortly before the shooter arrived) and the interior classroom door also didn't lock - a problem which had been known for some time, although a formal work order to fix it had apparently not been submitted.

If the exterior door had locked properly, the shooter would probably have been outside the building when the cops arrived. Even if the exterior door had failed, if the interior door had been able to lock, the shooter would have been wandering empty halls.
DiskoTroop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The right answer here is a mix of robust maintenance of your facility (as another user mentioned), a tight perimeter with good validation procedures of all visitors, a manned gate with well paid, intelligent guards, and good post orders that are managed/executed well by your team. Depending on the size of the campus I'd think this could be accomplished relatively easily by a higher end private security detail like Event Risk, Pinkerton's or even Allied Universal's Elite team (with the caveat being you have someone internally that can audit these people and ensure they're holding to standard.)

Ex Military is fine so long as you have a proper program to manage them. Volunteers are great too but not 100% reliable so you can supplement with dads or other such volunteers but that shouldn't be the core of the program. Armed teachers, (while I 100% agree is an amazing asset and if that's all you've got, do it because something is better than nothing,) it'll never replace a robust security program.

Off duty police are not a good option for a myriad of reasons.
Mr. Thunderclap McGirthy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
35chililights said:

ghollow said:

The school my wife works at has a number of ex-military teachers. I have always thought they would be great security if they were allowed to conceal carry.

Retired military folks would probably make good security guards as well.


While I'd love to agree with you, some ex-military folks I've met are the worlds worst at the mindset needed for the protection of others. Some civilians are much more mentally equipped to fill that role.

I realize some bad apples in a bunch spoil the reputation of many good apples. All I'm saying is be careful extending leeway to all, based on some.

A better way to do it is based on the individual, deep background checks, and group training. This illuminates bad egos and general dipshlts in a group pretty quickly.

To add to what 35 wrote. Just because they are military isn't a good indication. The percentage of Soldiers who fired their weapon in ww2 is crazy low. That percentage will be way lower for the recent wars. Beyond the training is the most important part. Is that individual ready to kill another person. I mean look that ****er in the eyes and unload into their chest. Make em look like a bowling ball blew through them. I would like to know if a counselor or someone like that can tell if someone has that ability.

But always training, training, more training and when you are tired train some more. In all kinds of places and conditions.

Adding: I wonder if the personality of someone who becomes a teacher is capable of killing.
In Hoc Signo Vinces
ghollow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
35chililights said:

ghollow said:

The school my wife works at has a number of ex-military teachers. I have always thought they would be great security if they were allowed to conceal carry.

Retired military folks would probably make good security guards as well.


While I'd love to agree with you, some ex-military folks I've met are the worlds worst at the mindset needed for the protection of others. Some civilians are much more mentally equipped to fill that role.


Sorry you misunderstood my post. My point was that there are a bunch of retired military folks who would love to help out in this capacity. They would, of course, have to be vetted and be able to handle the job. I am not suggesting that they use some retired vets that have issues that would prevent them from being around kids and/or being able to fulfill these duties.

Most retired military guys I know, and I know a lot, are a great bunch of guys and love giving back to there communities.

So the greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only be persuaded, never forced. It removes force from the equation... and that's why carrying a gun is a civilized act.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ghollow said:

35chililights said:

ghollow said:

The school my wife works at has a number of ex-military teachers. I have always thought they would be great security if they were allowed to conceal carry.

Retired military folks would probably make good security guards as well.


While I'd love to agree with you, some ex-military folks I've met are the worlds worst at the mindset needed for the protection of others. Some civilians are much more mentally equipped to fill that role.


Sorry you misunderstood my post. My point was that there are a bunch of retired military folks who would love to help out in this capacity. They would, of course, have to be vetted and be able to handle the job. I am not suggesting that they use some retired vets that have issues that would prevent them from being around kids and/or being able to fulfill these duties.

Most retired military guys I know, and I know a lot, are a great bunch of guys and love giving back to there communities.



The problem with these conversations (especially on boards like this) is people look at it as if their personal opinions make up for lack of awareness of reality. There's other things involved that most don't understand because they're just keyboard warrioring it as if only their kids are involved.

Insurance has requirements and a cost for making up in house security versus hiring professionals. Certified security companies that specialize in private school security have a hard time meeting the requirements for insurance. And most of them just saw a substantial increase in rates because of all the "school shootings" of the last year.

Volunteer watchdog / armed teachers / armed parents / off duty law enforcement sound great from a personal perspective until the first firearm is left unattended by accident, first negligent discharge, or the first time police investigate a trespassing / incident on campus and the school can no longer control the narrative. When something doesn't go perfectly, there's going to be investigations, emotionally irate parents, tv stations, and insurance issues. Not to mention the threat of lawsuits. Even if no one is injured. And all the above has a much greater chance to happen than anyone realizes because any competent school is going to keep as much of these quite if possible.

I used to be on a private school, school board. We went through all the things discussed on here. Had lots of small incidents and several real incidents that brought it all to only one clear option. Certified, insured, and bonded armed securities companies with experience at other private schools that were willing to place good officers there year round to build rapport and communication and were willing to be a part of the overall security / emergency part planning and action. The guards interact and learn the families and kids. They greet them on the way onto campus in the morning. They are part of the community and care about the kids they are there to protect.

We area 400-450 student school with more than 50 acres. Maintaining the property parameter, having one guard at the gated main entrance and one either patrolling the grounds or at the main office has worked the best for us from 1 hour before school until after the last activity is over. Then we augment with additional for events.
DiskoTroop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr. Thunderclap McGirthy said:

35chililights said:

ghollow said:

The school my wife works at has a number of ex-military teachers. I have always thought they would be great security if they were allowed to conceal carry.

Retired military folks would probably make good security guards as well.


While I'd love to agree with you, some ex-military folks I've met are the worlds worst at the mindset needed for the protection of others. Some civilians are much more mentally equipped to fill that role.

I realize some bad apples in a bunch spoil the reputation of many good apples. All I'm saying is be careful extending leeway to all, based on some.

A better way to do it is based on the individual, deep background checks, and group training. This illuminates bad egos and general dipshlts in a group pretty quickly.

To add to what 35 wrote. Just because they are military isn't a good indication. The percentage of Soldiers who fired their weapon in ww2 is crazy low. That percentage will be way lower for the recent wars. Beyond the training is the most important part. Is that individual ready to kill another person. I mean look that ****er in the eyes and unload into their chest. Make em look like a bowling ball blew through them. I would like to know if a counselor or someone like that can tell if someone has that ability.

But always training, training, more training and when you are tired train some more. In all kinds of places and conditions.

Adding: I wonder if the personality of someone who becomes a teacher is capable of killing.


The better question is is that individual capable of adhering to a rigorous program that has properly managed post orders and standard operating procedures. That is where ex military people in private security truly shine. The ability or willingness to kill is certainly something that's needed in some form but generally speaking, being able to keep to a regimented program with intense dedication is more important.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DiskoTroop said:

Mr. Thunderclap McGirthy said:

35chililights said:

ghollow said:

The school my wife works at has a number of ex-military teachers. I have always thought they would be great security if they were allowed to conceal carry.

Retired military folks would probably make good security guards as well.


While I'd love to agree with you, some ex-military folks I've met are the worlds worst at the mindset needed for the protection of others. Some civilians are much more mentally equipped to fill that role.

I realize some bad apples in a bunch spoil the reputation of many good apples. All I'm saying is be careful extending leeway to all, based on some.

A better way to do it is based on the individual, deep background checks, and group training. This illuminates bad egos and general dipshlts in a group pretty quickly.

To add to what 35 wrote. Just because they are military isn't a good indication. The percentage of Soldiers who fired their weapon in ww2 is crazy low. That percentage will be way lower for the recent wars. Beyond the training is the most important part. Is that individual ready to kill another person. I mean look that ****er in the eyes and unload into their chest. Make em look like a bowling ball blew through them. I would like to know if a counselor or someone like that can tell if someone has that ability.

But always training, training, more training and when you are tired train some more. In all kinds of places and conditions.

Adding: I wonder if the personality of someone who becomes a teacher is capable of killing.


The better question is is that individual capable of adhering to a rigorous program that has properly managed post orders and standard operating procedures. That is where ex military people in private security truly shine. The ability or willingness to kill is certainly something that's needed in some form but generally speaking, being able to keep to a regimented program with intent dedication is more important.

And doing so while being willing to listen to and coordinate with administration not only during drills, but during actual instances of high stress lock down instead of freezing up and going rogue. Even if most end up being false alarms.
GottaRide
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Smeghead4761 said:

35chililights said:

Do you have any teachers that want to be qualified to carry? That's huge.

Our public school has a decent number of armed teachers and staff. With a big signs at the entrances stating such.

If you can't get faculty to follow protocol on locked doors on buildings, all the security in the world is a popcorn fart in the wind as far as usefulness.




Maintenance on security-related items, including and perhaps especially, door locks, is also very important. The Uvalde shooter was able to get into the building because the exterior door didn't lock properly (contrary to a rumor which circulated shortly after the attack, it was not propped open with a rock, although a teacher had gone in and out shortly before the shooter arrived) and the interior classroom door also didn't lock - a problem which had been known for some time, although a formal work order to fix it had apparently not been submitted.

If the exterior door had locked properly, the shooter would probably have been outside the building when the cops arrived. Even if the exterior door had failed, if the interior door had been able to lock, the shooter would have been wandering empty halls.


Every exterior door of that building was unlocked. Watch the videos of the cops when they got there- they entered every exterior door. The teacher who left his classroom door unlocked has some extreme credibility issues. He has stated that he never got the alert so he didn't even try to lock his door. Then he came up with the story about his door lock having problems. It was tested and found to be functional. It was a school wide issue of complacency.
InfantryAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06 is spot on and speaking from experience.

Re-posting my comment on the F16 thread here for information / resource sharing:



First go here and implement these while you're sorting out your physical security.

https://www.avoiddenydefend.org/

https://www.stopthebleed.org/

Right now, by default, your school is it's own security manager. Hiring an off duty cop or a security guard is only one piece of the security plan. You can sub out the whole thing, but you need to know enough about security to smartly do so. At that point, you may just do it internally.

Have you talked with your local jurisdiction LE Agency? Many will have someone who can provide information.

Big differences in a security deterrent and a school resource officer type. Figure out the costs vs rewards of each.

Active shooters pick their targets based on lack of resistance or a personal connection/ grievance. The shooter just looking to kill will look for the easiest target.

The "inside" threat, someone who has a connection to the school, is where your staff can be important and should train to look for the signs. This is where an SRO type (VS straight security type) can be an advantage.

Physical security must be addressed. One secure entrance that require someone to be buzzed in after school starts. There is training in this type stuff and firms or agencies that can do an eval on your school. Again, check with your local LE Agency to see if they have this resource.

Some other resources...
https://txssc.txstate.edu/tools/sbta-toolkit/defining-tam
Same site, course login: https://sslp.txssc.txstate.edu/

https://tea.texas.gov/texas-schools/health-safety-discipline/safe-and-supportive-schools/school-safety-resources
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.