Windy City Ag said:
Quote:
The problem with this theory in relation to the tragic event that just happened, is that people are generally very risk prone even at the ages we deem acceptable. Heck, in the story that was just mentioned, the kid was 15 and was probably already driving on the highway legally with a permit. 16 year olds unfortunately have accidents all the time in regular vehicular accidents and we don't hold parents liable. I took more risks when I was legal driving age than I did on a ranch at 13. Lawsuits just destroy more lives. Just my 2 cents.
So I agree with this partly. I was more taking aim at the poster taking the reductio ad absurdum tack by equating motor vehicle safety with outlawing cheeseburgers. There is of course a gray area like swimming pools causing drowning deaths that will always be debatable . This is probably a grey area.
But at some point we can admit that things like seat belts and airbags in cars, put in due to regulation rather than the good intentions of car companies, save lives. I view motor safety laws as a separate thing because the dumb actions of one negatively impacts others. We would not have drinking and driving laws if 100% of the resulting deaths were just idiot drivers killing themselves. We have them because idiot drunk drivers run more often run into a minivan and kill a family with young kids.
So protesting any sort of restriction out of principle does not make sense to me
100% incorrect.
Why? Because look at the post that started this particular offshoot of the conversation. Kid unfortunately dies, the knee jerk reaction is to state that we should have laws preventing kids from being able to do X activity that resulted in a kid - one out of how many thousands and thousands that ride UTV's every day - driving one. It's an emotional response and not completely rational.
My kids have put several thousand miles on my Mule Pro around the neighborhood. I'm not exaggerating - I think I have around 4700 miles on my Mule and my daughters have at least 3500 of them driving around the neighborhood. And while the Mule may not have the get up and go that a Polaris or others do, it still tops out at 47-48 mph and most of the accidents happen at speeds well below that.
Did I worry about them? 100%. But I also spent a lot of time driving with them at first teaching them a few things and hammering on them about speeds and turns and what not, and the first few times we set them free they had a pretty limited range on where they could go. And it certainly made it much easier to learn to drive an actual car for my oldest, and will be the same for my youngest now that she is at the age I have to look at driver's ed again.
Accidents like this suck, no getting around it. But the answer to an accident isn't to look at everybody else and say "you get punished for it". That's what gun control is, and we typically frown upon it on this board. To lobbying for any sort of restriction out of principle or emotional feels does not make sense to me.