How would you grade our local media, concerning the recent Data Center land deal.

1,956 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 3 mo ago by EBrazosAg
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I must give our local BCs media a failed grade for their coverage of the Data Center land deal.

They turned in their assignment late and the assignment was incomplete.

I may be a bit harsh, but I would like to know how others viewed the local media coverage.
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
doubledog said:

I must give our local BCs media a failed grade for their coverage of the Data Center land deal.

They turned in their assignment late and the assignment was incomplete.

I may be a bit harsh, but I would like to know how others viewed the local media coverage.


I never thought I'd see local media carrying water for Priority Power Management, but you'd be wrong. (he's a former Aggie football player, after all)

I get it that a big corporation has a PR person, but you guys bought the whole "its not bitcoin, it's AI", (which is just as bad, maybe worse) hook, line, and sinker. Maybe do some research??? Naaahhhh

The secretive meetings, the NDA signed almost two weeks before they let council know, that's all water under the bridge now! Nothing to see here people, move along! /s

If this would have gotten pushed through, some of that would have been on their hands.
MsDoubleD81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
F
CS78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What media?
Colonel Kurtz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They are probably complicit with the city manager
EBrazosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think you can evaluate the "local media" as a whole fairly. TV vs radio vs fish and chips liner are very different entities. I'd throw in online media - but there isn't real online media that isn't an offshoot of the first 3.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
threecatcorner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think KBTX wasn't terrible. They actually had some coverage before the vote and during the city council meeting (not sure if they stayed the whole time), and they did let people know the result of the vote.

I think this is the first piece they did on it: https://www.kbtx.com/2025/09/09/college-station-midtown-developer-residents-share-concerns-about-potential-data-center/

At the bottom of that one, it has links to the others. Among other topics, they do tell people that it's going to be discussed Sept. 11 and that the agenda item got adjusted so it would be earlier in the meeting.

I think it was good of them to include https://www.kbtx.com/2025/09/11/college-station-city-leaders-adjust-data-center-agenda-item-ahead-meeting/ to let people know before the meeting (they posted it at 2:18 that day; I don't know what time of day that change was made, but I think it's close to when they put that online) that it was being moved from the very last item on the agenda to the first topic after the consent agenda. I notice that's after the time that people had to sign up to talk, but my guess is that's a large part of why the agenda order changed. My guess is that the reason the mayor and rest of city council was okay with Bob Yancy's suggestion to move that item earlier in the meeting was because 75 people signed up to talk (pretty sure that's the number people said).

Anyhow, I think that local media often posts stuff after it's happened, so posting it earlier is useful.

They included https://www.kbtx.com/2025/09/09/college-station-residents-push-back-against-sale-land-proposed-midtown-data-center/ about people meeting with Councilman Yancy at Coopers BBQ to express their concerns, and for people who hadn't heard about it, seeing a visual of how packed that place was and reading or listening to some of the people discussing their problems with it would be useful.

I think KBTX also included something about the discussion on this board and/or the petition that somebody was circulating on change.org, but I'm not sure which of their articles (I guess they're articles?) included links to those, or if I only think they included it and those were actually just on Rusty Surette's Facebook or something. Sometimes I see stuff that's actually on the KBTX website and other times, it's either on Rusty Surette's Facebook or maybe KBTX's (I think they do post stuff on Facebook sometimes that's not on the website itself).

So, maybe not A+ level of coverage, but I think y'all are being too harsh with giving them an F. They did actually let people know about it before it happened, including letting people know there was some pushback. There are probably some people who first heard about the issue from their coverage and knew to look further, so I think they did help.

I haven't looked at The Eagle in quite a while (website's paywalled, and the paper itself only comes out three times a week now), so I don't know what they covered or if they did, and I don't know about other local media. I thought someone said WTAW had something, but I haven't heard or read their coverage of it, and I don't normally see/hear what KAGS has. I don't know what other local media covers stuff around here.

*edited because I left out a word (I put "agenda" instead of "consent agenda")
Stucco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I read in the Eagle the day Priority Power contacted the city, the day the NDA was signed, and the day Council was informed. I haven't seen that information anywhere except the Eagle. That is a significant discovery and not something I think they could have come across without some investigation.
txgardengirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
that's great - but so few people read the eagle or subscribe and they paywalls kill their digital presence
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty sure they got that from Ostrowski's presentation. I would have glossed over it, but someone alerted me to the article (yeah, I had to subscribe) but I guess my question is, is it normal for city staff to enter into an NDA almost two weeks before informing the city council?
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txgardengirl said:

that's great - but so few people read the eagle or subscribe and they paywalls kill their digital presence

Does the BCS Eagle have an X account?
txgardengirl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
they do @theeagle but anytime you click a post it goes straight to $6.48/ month to view
tu ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is no more objective investigation in media, that aims to get to the truth.
There is sensationalism, search for profit, and a political agenda. That is it.
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tu ag said:

There is no more objective investigation in media, that aims to get to the truth.
There is sensationalism, search for profit, and a political agenda. That is it.

Part of that issue (to me) is that the TV news the reporter is also the cameraman and sound guy.

They are more worried about "getting the shot" than deep, investigative journalism.
FlyRod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
threecatcorner said:

I think KBTX wasn't terrible. They actually had some coverage before the vote and during the city council meeting (not sure if they stayed the whole time), and they did let people know the result of the vote.

I think this is the first piece they did on it: https://www.kbtx.com/2025/09/09/college-station-midtown-developer-residents-share-concerns-about-potential-data-center/

At the bottom of that one, it has links to the others. Among other topics, they do tell people that it's going to be discussed Sept. 11 and that the agenda item got adjusted so it would be earlier in the meeting.

I think it was good of them to include https://www.kbtx.com/2025/09/11/college-station-city-leaders-adjust-data-center-agenda-item-ahead-meeting/ to let people know before the meeting (they posted it at 2:18 that day; I don't know what time of day that change was made, but I think it's close to when they put that online) that it was being moved from the very last item on the agenda to the first topic after the consent agenda. I notice that's after the time that people had to sign up to talk, but my guess is that's a large part of why the agenda order changed. My guess is that the reason the mayor and rest of city council was okay with Bob Yancy's suggestion to move that item earlier in the meeting was because 75 people signed up to talk (pretty sure that's the number people said).

Anyhow, I think that local media often posts stuff after it's happened, so posting it earlier is useful.

They included https://www.kbtx.com/2025/09/09/college-station-residents-push-back-against-sale-land-proposed-midtown-data-center/ about people meeting with Councilman Yancy at Coopers BBQ to express their concerns, and for people who hadn't heard about it, seeing a visual of how packed that place was and reading or listening to some of the people discussing their problems with it would be useful.

I think KBTX also included something about the discussion on this board and/or the petition that somebody was circulating on change.org, but I'm not sure which of their articles (I guess they're articles?) included links to those, or if I only think they included it and those were actually just on Rusty Surette's Facebook or something. Sometimes I see stuff that's actually on the KBTX website and other times, it's either on Rusty Surette's Facebook or maybe KBTX's (I think they do post stuff on Facebook sometimes that's not on the website itself).

So, maybe not A+ level of coverage, but I think y'all are being too harsh with giving them an F. They did actually let people know about it before it happened, including letting people know there was some pushback. There are probably some people who first heard about the issue from their coverage and knew to look further, so I think they did help.

I haven't looked at The Eagle in quite a while (website's paywalled, and the paper itself only comes out three times a week now), so I don't know what they covered or if they did, and I don't know about other local media. I thought someone said WTAW had something, but I haven't heard or read their coverage of it, and I don't normally see/hear what KAGS has. I don't know what other local media covers stuff around here.

*edited because I left out a word (I put "agenda" instead of "consent agenda")

This is a really good, detailed, and IMO accurate summary of what occurred.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
threecatcorner said:

I think this is the first piece they did on it: https://www.kbtx.com/2025/09/09/college-station-midtown-developer-residents-share-concerns-about-potential-data-center/

At the bottom of that one, it has links to the others. Among other topics, they do tell people that it's going to be discussed Sept. 11 and that the agenda item got adjusted so it would be earlier in the meeting.


9/9 first mention by KBTX vote 9/11. Assignment was late.

Discussion after the fact, I thought was incomplete. KBTX did not dig very deep (after the vote) into this other than report the facts.

I will stay with the failing grade, assignment late, assignment incomplete (at least for KBTX)

EBrazosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chronicle ran an article about it this am. Fairly detailed. Half page on the back of business section.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tu ag said:

There is no more objective investigation in media, that aims to get to the truth.
There is sensationalism, search for profit, and a political agenda. That is it.

This post right below a post about hitting the 6 dollar paywall is the entire problem.

It's been this endless downward cycle for going on about 20 years now of nobody wanting to pay for local news, local newsrooms gets slashed or filled with rookie reporters who have no institutional area knowledge or well-placed sources, the news gets worse because of it, even fewer people want to pay for local news or advertise in the local news, and the cycle goes on and on.
tu ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are a few small operations that are changing reporting. Yes, they are subscriber based, but have free options.

I'm Catholic and there is one Catholic news source of this type that is better than anything we have had in decades. Hard hitting investigative reporting. They have broken numerous national and international stories and deep dives.

I'd also say Free Press is more old school journalism too.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's plenty of well-funded operations for national and international news because the potential subscriber base and advertising ROI is so much broader, but I'm talking about local journalism specifically. Especially in smaller markets.
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EBrazosAg said:

Chronicle ran an article about it this am. Fairly detailed. Half page on the back of business section.


Too bad that's behind a paywall as well….
EBrazosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeh. They have a digital special for $0.99 a month for a year. I think that's about what the Chronicle is worth.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.