I am a 2%er

2,513 Views | 16 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by BobAchgill
BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Paul Revere had a car, would he honk twice to warn that corporations were about to take over his town?

Do 2%ers rise up as Paul Revere did?

I got the notice today from KBTX just one hour before the special Bryan City Council meeting at noon.

They were taking public input on the RELLIS datacenter/chip fab project AND announcing how they'll build a playground at Midtown, where they've already given away most of the 150 acres of the old golf course to private businesses on long-term lease.

Why say you want "public input" when even the TV station points out this same last-minute notice happened last month during the RELLIS annexation vote? I arrived at 2:00 PM the guard said basically no citizens had shown up, and the council was in and out by 1:15.

This is the speech I was going to give…

Full video presentation here:



---

Bryan & College Station: Don't Give Away 100 % of the Future for 0 % Ownership

Bryan and College Station are being positioned as the national proving ground for a first-of-its-kind RELLIS campus combining semiconductors, hyperscale data centers, and nuclear SMRs. This is the prototype for a $7 trillion national build-out over the next decade.

City councils are operating under NDAs, giving the public almost no notice for votes that lock in reinvestment zones and tax breaks. Residents are being asked to shoulder the water, power, safety, and property risks, while outside corporations reap 100 % of the upsideproving technology they can resell nationwideand get tax breaks to do it.

This mirrors the Midtown golf course deal: 95 % handed over, 5 % playground left. Only now, the stakes are orders of magnitude higher.


---

The Ask: At Least 2 % Equity for the Community

If Brazos County is carrying the risk, it deserves a minimum 2 % stake in the platform being commercialized.

2 % of $7 T $140 B total, or roughly $560 K per resident over 10 years if shared.

Without this, residents are guinea pigsnot stakeholders.


Demand transparency, equity clauses, and a Brazos Permanent Fund to secure the community's rightful share.


---

Where Paul Revere Would Honk Twice Today

City Halls & Council Chambers where deals are being pushed through under NDAs. Honk to say: "We're watching."

Texas A&M Campus & RELLIS Gate the symbolic heart of the proving ground. Rally the Aggies.

Local Media (KBTX, The Eagle, WTAW) modern bell towers. Hold them accountable.

Major Intersections where everyday citizens can't ignore the signal.

TexAgs & Social Platforms today's town square. This is where the echo travels farthest.


Paul Revere didn't ride aimlessly he hit key communication points to rally a sleeping public. We must do the same. Bryan and College Station are at a crossroads: be the guinea pig, or be a stakeholder.


---

What's 2 % to companies that can commercially prove they can bag $7 trillion in sales?

Practically nothing. But to Brazos County, it's everything.

Honk twice if you love Paul Revere.

I'm sorry, John Sharp… family always ranks above school even if it means having to be a 2%er... but with this plan... everyone wins.

Full video presentation here:

EBrazosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The part I don't like is confidential negotiations under the NDA and then only 30 days for public review before final vote. Seems a tight timeline and reminds me of the CoCS data center debacle.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
FamousAgg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aren't they required to post a meeting agenda 7 days in advance?
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
72 hours
FamousAgg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, 3 business days
BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2% of the profit from Brazos County residents would go straight into your pocket $56,000 per person, every year, for 10 years.
That's for all 250,000 people in Brazos County men, women, and children alike.
It's your fair share for participating in proving the technology.

Do you want it?

Doing nothing means getting nothing and possibly ending up with a failed national experiment that could bring unintended consequences, such as:

Making RELLIS too noisy for students and professors to study.

Threatening our water security.

Driving up our power bills.


No one wants to talk about the other side.


---

The Calculation for the 2% Share

If Brazos County secured just 2% of the projected $7 trillion national build-out tied to the RELLIS prototype, that would equal $140 billion total.

Brazos County population: 250,000 residents

$140,000,000,000 250,000 people = $560,000 per person over 10 years

That's $56,000 per person per year, evenly distributed.


Examples:

A family of four would receive about $2.24 million total over 10 years.

A single teacher or public worker could receive more than their entire salary over a decade.

If this 2% stake were placed in a community fund (like Alaska's oil fund), it could generate permanent dividend payments for residents.



---

Right now, residents are being offered 0% while outside corporations receive tax breaks and 100% of the upside.

TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just out of curiosity, where did you come up with this idea? What makes you think you have any right to their money?
LOYAL AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

They were taking public input on the RELLIS datacenter/chip fab project AND announcing how they'll build a playground at Midtown, where they've already given away most of the 150 acres of the old golf course to private businesses on long-term lease.


Phrases like the bolded are teaching me not to take you seriously. Maybe it's poorly worded and you can clarify but right now that's the wording a child that doesn't understand what they're saying vs a serious adult wanting to make an argument. To be specific "given away" and "long term lease" are mutually exclusive.

Second as someone else noted what entitles you or me or anyone else to $56k per year return on an investment we didn't make? 2% of $0 is $0 and that's what you and I are entitled to. To quote Thomas Sowell, "How much of someone else's labor are you entitled to?"

I assume at this point you're trying to make another run at stopping the use of nuclear energy at RELLIS to power the data center apparently going in there. I lost track of that thread but before I did I saw a couple of people significantly smarter than me explaining the safety of current nuclear power systems which was much appreciated. What I didn't see was you presenting an alternative which again makes me not take you seriously.

If I've misread you I apologize but so far I see two marathon posts that amount to NIMBY with regard to data centers and the use of nuclear power to run them. If I'm wrong help me out.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAG 05 said:

Just out of curiosity, where did you come up with this idea? What makes you think you have any right to their money?

We need to discuss resume and legacy building.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If any of it is tax money, then every tax-paying citizen has a bit of ownership.
BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I posted the research in the video but only a handful of views from TexAgs. Try watching it and tell me what I'm missing.

BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOYAL AG said:

Quote:

They were taking public input on the RELLIS datacenter/chip fab project AND announcing how they'll build a playground at Midtown, where they've already given away most of the 150 acres of the old golf course to private businesses on long-term lease.


Phrases like the bolded are teaching me not to take you seriously. Maybe it's poorly worded and you can clarify but right now that's the wording a child that doesn't understand what they're saying vs a serious adult wanting to make an argument. To be specific "given away" and "long term lease" are mutually exclusive.

Second as someone else noted what entitles you or me or anyone else to $56k per year return on an investment we didn't make? 2% of $0 is $0 and that's what you and I are entitled to. To quote Thomas Sowell, "How much of someone else's labor are you entitled to?"

I assume at this point you're trying to make another run at stopping the use of nuclear energy at RELLIS to power the data center apparently going in there. I lost track of that thread but before I did I saw a couple of people significantly smarter than me explaining the safety of current nuclear power systems which was much appreciated. What I didn't see was you presenting an alternative which again makes me not take you seriously.

If I've misread you I apologize but so far I see two marathon posts that amount to NIMBY with regard to data centers and the use of nuclear power to run them. If I'm wrong help me out.


I forget that College Station folks don't necessarily know Bryan's issues. You will see the reason below for my having bolded above.

As for your question about fairness to receive just 2% of the profit stream that argument is made in the explainer video.

Here is the answer to your park question... I think you will see that both city councils operate pretty much the same. Its like they don't work for the citizens.

Midtown Bryan Park Misuse Text Summary

The Midtown Bryan redevelopment plan originally promised free, public parkland as a central part of revitalizing the area between Downtown Bryan and Texas Avenue. These parks were meant to be open spaces for recreation, community gathering, and environmental protection. Early public meetings and planning documents showed large areas designated for parks and greenways, and residents were led to expect that these would remain permanently open and free.

Over time, however, portions of this planned parkland have been leased out for long-term commercial use. Instead of open public parks, several areas are now occupied by businesses or facilities run by private operators under leases that last decades. These leases often give the lessee control over access, hours, and revenue. As a result, some formerly public areas now charge entry fees, restrict public access during private events, or function as commercial spaces rather than parks.

The city has used mechanisms such as long-term ground leases, development agreements, or actions by redevelopment authorities to make these deals without holding a public vote. While the city technically retains ownership of the land, the practical effect is privatization. Residents have noticed that what was supposed to be a public park is now fenced off, controlled by private entities, or only accessible under certain conditions.

This shift has raised several concerns:

Broken public promises: Land shown as future public parkland has been repurposed without transparent explanation.

Equity issues: Low-income residents lose access to free recreational spaces.

Public process: Key decisions were made with little public input or notice.

Precedent: Long-term leases may set a pattern where other public lands can be monetized.

Legal questions: If the land was dedicated for park use, these leases could violate legal restrictions or require voter approval.


In some Texas cities, similar actions have been successfully challenged by citing park dedication covenants, the public trust doctrine, or state oversight through Texas Parks & Wildlife. If Midtown Bryan parkland was originally promised or designated as public park space, its long-term commercial leasing could be contested legally or politically.
BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
maroon barchetta said:

If any of it is tax money, then every tax-paying citizen has a bit of ownership.


This is precisely why Brazos County residents should receive a return on their "investment." By providing the infrastructure, resources, and community environment that enable these companies to test and refine their technologies in a real-world commercial incubator, local residents are effectively serving as uncompensated partners in the development process. Their tax incentives, water, and power resources make the proving ground possible so it's reasonable that they should share in the long-term benefits if the technology succeeds.
BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAG 05 said:

Just out of curiosity, where did you come up with this idea? What makes you think you have any right to their money?


maroon barchetta said:

If any of it is tax money, then every tax-paying citizen has a bit of ownership.



This is precisely why Brazos County residents should receive a return on their "investment." By providing the infrastructure, resources, and community environment that enable these companies to test and refine their technologies in a real-world commercial incubator, local residents are effectively serving as uncompensated partners in the development process. Their tax incentives, water, and power resources make the proving ground possible so it's reasonable that they should share in the long-term benefits if the technology succeeds.

This is answered in the presentation... let me know if I have missed anything after you watch.

BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
doubledog said:

TXAG 05 said:

Just out of curiosity, where did you come up with this idea? What makes you think you have any right to their money?

We need to discuss resume and legacy building.


I doubledog dare you to watch So far only 15 Texags have watched.

BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The runway to standing up for Brazos county's fair share just got a lot shorter. Where is Paul Revere when you need him? Hey Ags, pass it back.

https://wtaw.com/texas-am-system-announces-an-agreement-to-build-a-nuclear-reactor-on-the-rellis-campus/

Share this...
BobAchgill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BobAchgill said:

TXAG 05 said:

Just out of curiosity, where did you come up with this idea? What makes you think you have any right to their money?


maroon barchetta said:

If any of it is tax money, then every tax-paying citizen has a bit of ownership.



This is precisely why Brazos County residents should receive a return on their "investment." By providing the infrastructure, resources, and community environment that enable these companies to test and refine their technologies in a real-world commercial incubator, local residents are effectively serving as uncompensated partners in the development process. Their tax incentives, water, and power resources make the proving ground possible so it's reasonable that they should share in the long-term benefits if the technology succeeds.

This is answered in the presentation... let me know if I have missed anything after you watch.




Lets pray about it.

James 1:5 NKJV
If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all liberally and without reproach, and it will be given to him.

"Lord, can You give us wisdom on how we should respond on this big issue facing our community? In Jesus name."

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.