New BHS football coach

3,290 Views | 31 Replies | Last: 8 days ago by drred4
halibut sinclair
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great hire or Bob Bellard 2.0?

https://www.kbtx.com/2026/01/16/bryan-isd-hires-former-player-vikings-head-football-coach/
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The guy looks to be a good hire. Denton Guyer isn't a slouch. Winning program. He was even at North Texas.

His resume is good but he'll have to get the athletes to compete, which Bryan has been lacking.
oklaunion
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:

The guy looks to be a good hire. Denton Guyer isn't a slouch. Winning program. He was even at North Texas.

His resume is good but he'll have to get the athletes to compete, which Bryan has been lacking.

And what causes that? Bryan has always been a hotbed of athletes and I doubt it has changed. Are they just not wanting to compete in sports? Has the coaching really been that bad at both schools?
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BISD really needs to figure out how to move 200 students from Bryan High to Rudder. Bryan always being one of the smallest 6a schools definitely hurts their ability to compete. For the 2026 realignment they are 52 students above being 5a. Having all 4 high schools competing with each other in town would be a good thing for all 4 of them

ETA Bryan had fewer than 100 more students than Consol. Both CISD schools are some of the largest in 5a.
jj.5150
How long do you want to ignore this user?
100% agree with Boozer92 , they aren't going to compete in 6A .
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep. Trade off all those long distance weeknight trips for basketball, volleyball, soccer, baseball, softball for 3 right in town and 4 more all an hour away.

It will not happen any time fast.
gibby03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Few issues at Bryan High.

1. Shouldn't be in 6A. Have to find a way to get some kids moved to Rudder to get Bryan High back down to 5A. That alone won't make it easier, it will just be more realistic in numbers of kids competing against others. The 5A district around here isn't easy by any means.

2. Bryan High is overwhelmingly Hispanic. Those kids don't play football very much. Which means the AA and White kids have to come out in high numbers to compete. You better hit on those kids too because you can't afford to have half of those kids not be athletic.

3. There's a fine balance of how you handle these kids in Bryan. There are lots of kids roaming the hallways who don't play sports. Name a reason as to why they aren't playing and you'll probably be correct, but you have to get those kids out. The problem is, you take a kid who hasn't consistently played sports, put them in a highly competitive environment, they don't experience success right away and they quit. That's human nature these days with youth.

4. The other balancing act is, do you allow the "problem" kids out, which will normally make you more athletically equal, but deal with the issues that come with that? Or, hold kids to a standard and know that you'll probably lose some athletes. It's a fine balancing act that not many people can do well. Maybe Joseph can but that will be his charge.

5. You have to restructure the MS and/or hire young kids out of college who really WANT to coach and to be teachers. Young guys who want to invest in being legitimate and professional coaches. Develop kids and build from within. By the time they get to HS they have either been playing for 2 years or they haven't. You want them playing.

6. Bob Bellard's issue was that it was football and football only. Other sports didn't matter. Time wasn't invested. Some sports had success, that wasn't the issue, it was that there wasn't an entire athletic program focused on developing kids, coaches and the program as a whole. Joseph will have to do that.

7. Let the coaches coach. Too many parents in Bryan want Bryan high to be the Bryan High of old. It ain't that. The demographics aren't the same. The athletes aren't the same. The landscape isn't the same. But the negativity from some of those parents absolutely kills any momentum Bryan has gained over the years. In 2014 and 2015 they win back to back District titles. Advance 2-3 rounds deep. In 2016 they end the year 6-6 but lose in the 2nd round. Next thing you know there are parents moving their kids to CSHS and Consol because "those coaches don't know s***". That's a problem.

Those are just my opinions.
13B
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gibby03 said:

Few issues at Bryan High.

1. Shouldn't be in 6A. Have to find a way to get some kids moved to Rudder to get Bryan High back down to 5A. That alone won't make it easier just more realistic in numbers of kids competing against others. The 5A district around here isn't easy by any means.

2. Bryan High is overwhelmingly Hispanic. Those kids don't play football very much. Which means the AA and White kids have to come out in high numbers to compete. You better hit on those kids too because you can't afford to have half of those kids not be athletic.

3. There's a fine balance of how you handle these kids in Bryan. There are lots of kids roaming the hallways who don't play sports. Name a reason as to why and you'll probably be correct, but you have to get those kids out. The problem is, you take a kid who hasn't consistently played sports, put them in a highly competitive environment, they don't experience success right away and they quit. That's human nature these days with youth.

4. The other balancing act is, do you allow the "problem" kids out, which will normally make you more athletically equal but deal with the issues that come with that? Or, hold kids to a standard and know that you'll probably lose some athletes. It's a fine balancing act that not many people can do well. Maybe Joseph can but that will be his charge.

5. You have to restructure the MS and/or hire young kids out of college who really WANT to coach, to be teachers. Young guys who want to invest in being legitimate and professional coaches. Develop kids and build from within. By the time they get to HS they have either been playing for 2 years or they haven't. You want them playing.

6. Bob Bellard's issue was that it was football and football only. Other sports didn't matter. Time wasn't invested. Some sports had success, that wasn't the issue, it was that there wasn't an entire athletic program focused on developing kids, coaches and the program as a whole. Joseph will have to do that.

7. Let the coaches coach. Too many parents in Bryan want Bryan high to be the Bryan High of old. It ain't that. The demographics aren't the same. The athletes aren't the same. The landscape isn't the same. But the negativity from some of those parents absolutely kills any momentum Bryan has gained over the years. In 2014 and 2015 they win back to back District titles. Advance 2-3 rounds deep. In 2016 they end the year 6-6 but lose in the 2nd round. Next thing you know there are parents moving their kids to CSHS and Consol because "those coaches don't know s***". That's a problem.

Those are just my opinions.

I would add that Middle Schools should be running the same Offense and Defense that the HS is running. That way, by the time they get to HS, they are well familiar with, at the very least, terminology and basic concepts.
gibby03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed. Definitely should be done. That's part of the investment to making those coaches legitimate and professional coaches.
Vinewood_03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HUGE step in the right direction concerning BHS football/athletic program as a whole. That other guy never invested in the community and was never visible. Joesph brings immediate credibility being a Bryan boy, mixed in with being a successful former QB/athlete. He has his work cut out for him for sure, but the potential is there. Realignment is a short term issue and he's about to get a brand new field house/weight room. Believe he also might be the youngest HC BHS has ever hired. There appear to be a lot of stars beginning to align in Bryan. Always felt they were a sleeping giant of sorts where if they ever got their ducks in a row - watch out.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Boozer92 said:

BISD really needs to figure out how to move 200 students from Bryan High to Rudder. Bryan always being one of the smallest 6a schools definitely hurts their ability to compete. For the 2026 realignment they are 52 students above being 5a. Having all 4 high schools competing with each other in town would be a good thing for all 4 of them

ETA Bryan had fewer than 100 more students than Consol. Both CISD schools are some of the largest in 5a.

I completely agree. I find inaction by the board to be egregious. Bryan can't compete at 6A.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How concerned are Bryan residents about CSISD opening up their district? The board still hasn't figured out how to handle HS transfers - which is why I think they are starting with younger grades. However, these kids will eventually be 9th graders. Some trustees have suggested flipping a coin to assign a HS. As a CSISD taxpayer, I don't want to pay for kids out of the boundaries and I think that is the majority opinion. The board talks about the money from the state (income) but has never discussed the expenses to pay for more students. At a minimum, that would be additional staff to educate more students. Why would taxpayers approve any bonds to fix problems?
kevmiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On paper should be a decent hire

I don't know the girls side but both Bryan and Rudder in football, baseball and boys basketball have been absolutely atrocious in recent years.

Buford T. Justice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wasn't Bryan #1 in the state like 20 years ago, and then lost their last three games of the season? And then cratered after that.
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I apologize for derailing this thread about Coach Joseph with BISD board issues. I remember when he played at Bryan and think very highly of his family. I wish him the best of luck changing the culture in BISD
Vinewood_03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From what I've heard BHS got below the UIL 6A threshold of old (2275) this past October but UIL dropped the number for the first time in a long time leaving them in 6A again.
gibby03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes but it wasn't intentional. The lowering of the number was an indication of a decrease in kids in schools which is a trend across the state.
Mr.Short-termMemory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gibby03 said:

Yes but it wasn't intentional. The lowering of the number was an indication of a decrease in kids in schools which is a trend across the state.


Correct. But intentional or not, it makes it hard for the district to "try to get under the limit" when you don't know what your target limit is ahead of time.
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty much everyone in the know said they didn't get low enough. If BISD didn't know. They were the only ones. That is a different discussion.
gibby03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr.Short-termMemory said:

gibby03 said:

Yes but it wasn't intentional. The lowering of the number was an indication of a decrease in kids in schools which is a trend across the state.


Correct. But intentional or not, it makes it hard for the district to "try to get under the limit" when you don't know what your target limit is ahead of time.


I think your missing the point. There was no intentional design to fix the issue. It was status quo without a plan. THEN, numbers came out and it looks like "oh man, they were right there. So close".

If there was truly a plan that number would've dropped by a couple hundred due to zoning to balance the schools. That's a designed plan that takes a couple of years to come to fruition. That is what hasn't happened for a long time. Then, it's not close when the UIL does their snapshot.
Mr.Short-termMemory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gibby03 said:

Mr.Short-termMemory said:

gibby03 said:

Yes but it wasn't intentional. The lowering of the number was an indication of a decrease in kids in schools which is a trend across the state.


Correct. But intentional or not, it makes it hard for the district to "try to get under the limit" when you don't know what your target limit is ahead of time.


I think your missing the point. There was no intentional design to fix the issue. It was status quo without a plan. THEN, numbers came out and it looks like "oh man, they were right there. So close".

If there was truly a plan that number would've dropped by a couple hundred due to zoning to balance the schools. That's a designed plan that takes a couple of years to come to fruition. That is what hasn't happened for a long time. Then, it's not close when the UIL does their snapshot.



I'm on the outside looking in. I don't have insider knowledge you appear to.

I'm not in BISD administration. I have had discussions with some on working to get numbers lower. You're right, they did not rezone to get lower. But there are more than one way to skin a cat. And I'm familiar with some of those plans that were being worked.
gibby03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr.Short-termMemory said:

gibby03 said:

Mr.Short-termMemory said:

gibby03 said:

Yes but it wasn't intentional. The lowering of the number was an indication of a decrease in kids in schools which is a trend across the state.


Correct. But intentional or not, it makes it hard for the district to "try to get under the limit" when you don't know what your target limit is ahead of time.


I think your missing the point. There was no intentional design to fix the issue. It was status quo without a plan. THEN, numbers came out and it looks like "oh man, they were right there. So close".

If there was truly a plan that number would've dropped by a couple hundred due to zoning to balance the schools. That's a designed plan that takes a couple of years to come to fruition. That is what hasn't happened for a long time. Then, it's not close when the UIL does their snapshot.



I'm on the outside looking in. I don't have insider knowledge you appear to.

I'm not in BISD administration. I have had discussions with some on working to get numbers lower. You're right, they did not rezone to get lower. But there are more than one way to skin a cat. And I'm familiar with some of those plans that were being worked.


For sure. Re-zoning is not the only way. Ultimately, lots of people want what's best for Bryan High. A successful Bryan High is a good thing. It's just frustrating watching it flounder for going on 10+ years now in 6A.
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Until BISD decides that they want both Rudder and Bryan to succeed neither will.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Move 200-250 kids to Rudder. This can be done this year and have it effective Aug 2027-2028 school year at a minimum. The worst thing that can happen is for kids to not even go out for athletics or extra curricular activities because they have a losing tradition with no end in sight to stop it. The board needs to help out its 2 high schools. UIL classification is also used for other competitions outside of athletics. The benefits of being in 5a will be felt across all programs.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Completely agree about all four schools at 5A would be best. We were crossing our fingers in CS hoping both of our schools stayed 5A as well... makes athletics and fine arts much more competitive!

One wonders how far off 7A is in Texas....
Boozer92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They could shave off the 100 largest schools and form 7a

More schools making the playoffs is always what coaches vote for

That would put both CSISD and Bryan in 6a. Rudder would then be the outlier since they are so much smaller

Here are the current numbers for reference

https://www.uiltexas.org/athletics/conference-cutoffs

Marlin39m
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Off season prep is the mark of good coaching. There has been a marked difference between BHS kids and other teams, physically, over the tenure of the last coach. Add to that weak coaching during the season, and you end up with current juniors on JV that have only won ONE game since they started at BHS. Some really good players have left because of that. Best of luck to the new coach. These kids deserve better than what they have had.
Buford T. Justice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you had four high schools in Bryan, would they all still be 5A, or very large 4A?
dailygrind
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can't just add 200-250 students to Rudder. Rudder was built to be a 3A high school and currently operating at 5A capacity. They are full as it is. But the district needs to put equal effort into BOTH high schools and not just for BHS to be the top. There are a few issues that need to be delt with but I agree that 7&8 th grade sports needs to be addressed. We are not building successful programs at the younger age. I hope the new coach with see these issues and address them.
drred4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will he be a good hire, I hope so for the kids sake.

From what i understand there are plenty of kids roaming the halls that are very good athletes that do not want to play. I heard that the past Coach had a players meeting in the mornings and many times he or others primary that were supposed to be there routinely ran 15 minutes late. That would be a bad sign to me. Why would I want to show up on time if the main guy doesn't

You have kids zoned for Rudder that are also going to BHS because of IB program and others programs not at Rudder.

My daughter is a freshman this year at Bryan and the traveling for district games it crazy. Copperas Cove? Harker Heights,, etc. I wish all 4 HS in town were in same district, but not the case. I figured CSHS would go to 6a next year.

Something I think is really dumb is all the division 1 and 2 mess. If FB, VB, BB are classified in those divisions then all sports or UIL items should be classified that way
southwestag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gibby03 said:

Few issues at Bryan High.

2. Bryan High is overwhelmingly Hispanic. Those kids don't play football very much. Which means the AA and White kids have to come out in high numbers to compete. You better hit on those kids too because you can't afford to have half of those kids not be athletic.


That right there is the elephant in the room no one talks about - once you become majority Hispanic your sports margin for error in football and basketball changes overnight

See Houston ISD schools forced to play 6a cause of a large Hispanic population - coaches have told me their a hard group to convince to play and parents won't let them play also due to duties at home - North Shore has hit on the AA at a high rate to offset that but Galena Park hasn't
drred4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't understand that of, duties at home, because the other type of Futbol the whole team is nearly all Hispanic.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.