Excellent development.
Quote:
At the heart of Dallas County is the Commissioners Court. Each Texas County has four Commissioners and a County Judge who serve on this Court. The County is divided into four districts, and the voters of each district elect a Commissioner to serve a four-year term. All the voters of the County elect the County Judge to a four-year term. Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins is the presiding Officer of our County Commissioners Court.
Absolute said:
So the city council wants to completely f up any kind of decision by making no decisions, like they do with anything else they touch.
So most importantly are they likely to close liqueur stores (though I can get by on wine front he grocery)?
Absolute said:
So the city council wants to completely f up any kind of decision by making no decisions, like they do with anything else they touch.
So most importantly are they likely to close liqueur stores (though I can get by on wine front he grocery)?
hatchback said:
This is the county commissioners court, not city council.Quote:
At the heart of Dallas County is the Commissioners Court. Each Texas County has four Commissioners and a County Judge who serve on this Court. The County is divided into four districts, and the voters of each district elect a Commissioner to serve a four-year term. All the voters of the County elect the County Judge to a four-year term. Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins is the presiding Officer of our County Commissioners Court.
https://www.dallascounty.org/government/comcrt/
Jenkins and JWP are very close and are basically two peas in a pod.CastleRock said:FortWorthF3 said:
Commissioners Court Vote to Limit Jenkins Emergency Powers
No opinion on Jenkins, really. I think he's doing a decent job.
However, if John Wiley Price is against Jenkins, then I support Jenkins 100%. JWP is a criminal.
Agree. There should be more transparency around the data that went in to this decision making. Blanket statements like "that's what the scientific community requests" while standing in front of what looks like a chart from a 5th grade science project, at least optically looks bad even if it is the correct call.MGS said:
All I see is a petty, wannabe-tyrant that doesn't have to worry about getting a paycheck making unilateral decisions about people's livelihoods and just yells "Science!" to anybody who dares to question them.
There's nothing respectable about that.
That description fits most people screaming about this situation and the strong effort to make this shut down as long as possible. Guaranteed pay check by the people talking. That right there should make everyone question this deal.MGS said:
All I see is a petty, wannabe-tyrant that doesn't have to worry about getting a paycheck making unilateral decisions about people's livelihoods and just yells "Science!" to anybody who dares to question them.
There's nothing respectable about that.
I don't think any reasonable person believes he's trying to "crush the economy" but even a cursory review of his twitter feed reveals that he is using this to do some pretty audacious political grandstanding.dave94 said:
What in the world is anyone thinking he's trying to gain by making these decisions?
It's one thing to believe he's overreacting by taking the hard stance of closing businesses where people congregate, or championing the shelter in place. But do you really think the goal is to crush the economy or just make a name for himself, knowing that these decisions will make him the opposite of being re-elected, let alone a viable gubernatorial candidate?
TexasAggie008 said:
Before anyone goes any further defending his agenda here - go on twitter, and skim each and every tweet of
His over the last 2-3 weeks
If after doing so, you still think he's generally non partisan and just trying to save lives - and not the epitome of leftist Baylor lawyer doo**bag - let's hear it
Its not just "classic lib dooosh's" who do this. You realize that, right?Quote:
Tweeting [insert name here] instead emailing, calling, etc tells me a lot
Chewy said:DFWTLR said:
His explanation for liquor stores is so alcoholics don't go into withdrawls and require hospital beds. I'm all for keeping liquor stores open (and nearly everything else since you can argue everything is essential), but I wonder how many beds alcohol withdrawal would actually take.
Is this real? That's actually the logic used? He's an effing moron for even saying that.
Shouldn't he also say anyone dealing drugs can do so in plain sight so those addicts won't need hospital beds?
That is such a moronic take.
Quote:
Every single day people die from alcohol withdrawal. A large number of these deaths are brought on by people trying to detox at home. Shortly after singer Amy Winehouse died, her family revealed that her death was caused by going cold turkey at home. So, what makes alcohol withdrawal so incredibly dangerous? Alcohol detox, many experts agree, brings on some of the most dangerous withdrawal side effects of any drug. Unlike prescription painkillers or meth, alcoholics can literally die from not having a drink. And one of the most common factors affecting those deaths is delirium tremens a severe form of alcohol withdrawal that involves sudden and severe mental or nervous system changes.
Gridlock is usually the best course of action when it comes to government decision making.Absolute said:
So the city council wants to completely f up any kind of decision by making no decisions, like they do with anything else they touch.
So most importantly are they likely to close liqueur stores (though I can get by on wine front he grocery)?
yukmonkey said:nai06 said:
Then maybe Abbott shouldn't be governor. If he's going to let a county judge push him around, he should step aside.
Gonna parlay his "leadership" into greater aspirations...AGCP3 said:I don't think any reasonable person believes he's trying to "crush the economy" but even a cursory review of his twitter feed reveals that he is using this to do some pretty audacious political grandstanding.dave94 said:
What in the world is anyone thinking he's trying to gain by making these decisions?
It's one thing to believe he's overreacting by taking the hard stance of closing businesses where people congregate, or championing the shelter in place. But do you really think the goal is to crush the economy or just make a name for himself, knowing that these decisions will make him the opposite of being re-elected, let alone a viable gubernatorial candidate?
that tweet...Hood said:Gonna parlay his "leadership" into greater aspirations...AGCP3 said:I don't think any reasonable person believes he's trying to "crush the economy" but even a cursory review of his twitter feed reveals that he is using this to do some pretty audacious political grandstanding.dave94 said:
What in the world is anyone thinking he's trying to gain by making these decisions?
It's one thing to believe he's overreacting by taking the hard stance of closing businesses where people congregate, or championing the shelter in place. But do you really think the goal is to crush the economy or just make a name for himself, knowing that these decisions will make him the opposite of being re-elected, let alone a viable gubernatorial candidate?
yukmonkey said:
No one I even remotely know has caught this.
yukmonkey said:
The impact on the community? Yeah we are stuck in our ****ing house and businesses are failing around us. No one I even remotely know has caught this.