Kunkle for Congress TX-34 said:
I have been campaigning on drainage for the last four years in South Texas. Basically, we need a drainage project on a New Orleans scale encompassing Hidalgo, Cameron, and Willacy Counties.
Probably 5X the cost of the 2nd Causeway...
I think many of the drainage/flooding problems in the RGV are almost insurmountable, except for certain specific areas. Reason being is that so many of the natural pathways or flows of water to the river have been altered, built upon, reduced, and changed. There is too much value in much of that land nowadays to completely repurpose it, condemn it or eminent domain it.
Some time in the mid to late 90's I got to see a booklet/pamphlet that showed superimposed images of various parts of the RGV at their current state on aerial photos of the flooding from Beulah, it was pretty scary. This was done for a some real estate agents that were working with big box stores and real estate companies/developers at the time of the big RGV expansion of large stores and commercial properties. I guess they were trying to avoid building or buying in flood prone areas. It was eyeopening to see all the development that had been done on areas that flooded harshly back then.
I don't think the old drainage plans, which I understand were formulated in the 20's and 30's, ever contemplated the true development of the RGV and the population explosion that took place, and is taking place. There are parts of the RGV that flood now that used to not flood and vice versa. For all the wonderful things about deep coastal STX, there are a bunch of issues with flat land flooding and lack of drainage.