Pepper Brooks said:
Are you able to summarize the work that's gone into testing it and why we should feel comfortable with this?
As someone with a 3yr old who's had RSV, and a newborn who hopefully won't, I'm intrigued.
As someone who chose not to get the MRNA vaccine, and was fired by two doctors for not believing the science, Im hesitant.
Technical info:
label (fda.gov)Nirsevimab-alip is a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that provides passive immunity by targeting the prefusion conformation of the RSV F protein. Nirsevimab-alip is long-acting due to a triple amino acid substitution (YTE) in the Fc region which increases binding to the neonatal Fc receptor and thereby extends serum half-life. Nirsevimab-alip binds to a conserved epitope in antigenic site on the prefusion protein with dissociation constants KD = 0.12 nM and KD = 1.22 nM for RSV subtype A and B strains, respectively; it neutralizes RSV by inhibiting conformation changes in the F protein necessary for fusion of the viral and cellular membranes and viral entry.
They did a bunch of studies all summarized on that link. This will not prevent RSV or community spread the goal is to decrease severity. Monoclonal antibodies are not a new technology they have been used for decades. This is just one specifically for RSV and lasts about 5 months. The side effect profile looked very good in the initial studies.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full
Medical Disclaimer.