Just one of many controversial statements in this quite interesting discussion...
They generally aren't.Quote:
I haven't watched the video but I've had numerous Indian students in the past few years who say he wasn't the hero that everyone makes him out to be.
Agreed. One of the lessons my students are participating in is "Was Andrew Jackson a political hero or villain?". I'm not a huge fan of it because I don't like that kids are stuck thinking dichotomous views are the way to view historical events or people. I've clearly fallen prey to that way of thinking from time to time and it's hindered my understanding of history. So we listed out the traits of a political villain and hero and then I asked them to think about different people, real and fictional. Thankfully, they all came to the conclusion that very few people are one or the other completely but the whole of their work can make them more of one than the other. They enjoyed it and then they went through the primary sources and let the evidence guide them. It's been interesting to see students argue one way or another.aalan94 said:They generally aren't.Quote:
I haven't watched the video but I've had numerous Indian students in the past few years who say he wasn't the hero that everyone makes him out to be.
What were "his own" narrow interests?cbr said:
ghandi was definitely in it for 'his own' narrow interests.
Sapper Redux said:
There's been a recent push in India against Ghandi because he wasn't considered a Hindu nationalist. In fact, his assassin was a Hindu nationalist that belonged to the predecessor of Modi's party and is revered by some segments of the current ruling party.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:
I haven't watched the video but I've had numerous Indian students in the past few years who say he wasn't the hero that everyone makes him out to be.
Threetoedcoyote said:
Interesting take. This younger generation likes to sling the word "colonizer" around quite a bit but it is doubtful that they are seeing the full perspective.