Story Poster
Photo by Maria Lysaker-Imagn Images
Texas A&M Football

Elko should keep gambling in Vegas in ways that increase A&M's odds

December 10, 2024
8,336

Every year, millions of visitors go to Las Vegas, intent on gambling.

The hope here is that Texas A&M football coach Mike Elko will, too.

That’s not to imply Elko should be seen doubling down at the blackjack tables or trying to get six the “hard way” next week when A&M arrives to face USC in the Las Vegas Bowl.

On second thought, maybe it does. Too often for A&M, getting six the “hard way” means scoring a touchdown rather than two field goals.

Presumably, that’s why Elko has opted to “go for it” on fourth down so frequently. It’s a gamble which hasn’t paid off enough for the Aggies.

Elko has attempted 17 fourth-down conversions. The Aggies have converted just seven times. That’s a 41.2 percent success rate. That’s bad.

But the rate was even worse in the last three SEC games vs. South Carolina, Auburn and Texas. The Aggies converted just 25 percent (2-of-8) on fourth. That’s resulted in three losses — and A&M landing in Vegas instead of the College Football Playoff.

“We’re going to do that. That’s something we’re going to do. We haven’t really been in that situation before. We have to be able to get half a yard.”
- Texas A&M head coach Mike Elko

Twice, the Aggies tried to convert fourth-and-1 from their own 34-yard line vs. South Carolina. Both times, they failed.

“It was fourth-and-half-a-yard for both of them that we went for,” Elko said then. “We’re going to do that. That’s something we’re going to do. We haven’t really been in that situation before. We have to be able to get half a yard.”

But the Aggies couldn’t.

Twice against Texas, they were stopped when needing a yard or less to convert on fourth down. All four times, the Aggies opted for inside runs — once with Marcel Reed on a quarterback sneak and three times with Amari Daniels on an inside run.

Elko should learn his lesson. And that lesson is to gamble like Dan Campbell.

As you saw last Thursday, Campbell — the beloved Aggie who coaches the Detroit Lions — opted to go for it on fourth down five times in a 34-31 victory over Green Bay.

Twice, the Lions converted 2-yard passes on fourth down for touchdowns. A quarterback sneak on fourth-and-1 at midfield extended a drive for a touchdown. A fourth-down run by David Montgomery set up a game-winning field goal with no time remaining.

Campbell gambled. But he took calculated risks and looked for advantageous matchups. The Lions capitalized on running back Jahmyr Gibbs’ superior athleticism to beat a linebacker on an angle route for an easy touchdown.

Another touchdown pass went to seldom-used receiver Tim Patrick.

On the clinching run, Montgomery ran behind right tackle Penei Sewell — arguably the Lions’ best offensive lineman — and tight ends Shane Zylstra and Sam LaPorta, who was brought in motion.

The point is that Detroit was only predictable in that Campbell would go for it on fourth down. The play-calling wasn’t predictable.

Elko has said that for A&M to get to championship level, the Aggies must be able to get a yard when needed most.

But that doesn’t have to be with a predictable inside run.

Try Terry Bussey on a jet sweep. Maybe run Rueben Owens from the Wildcat. Give the football to a 300-pound lineman. Throw high to 6-foot-6 receiver Noah Thomas. Use motion. Make the defense guess what play is coming.

Elko should stay aggressive. He should gamble in Las Vegas. Just find ways to increase the odds in A&M’s favor.

Then, getting six maybe won’t be so hard.

Discussion from...

Elko should keep gambling in Vegas in ways that increase A&M's odds

5,548 Views | 11 Replies | Last: 14 days ago by RUGuys4Real
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
i am all for going for it on fourth down but damn we should have kicked field goals on the opening drive and final drive vs texas. the first drive we gift wrapped momentum early cause we couldn't make it and at the end of the game from the 1. you have to kick a fg when down by two scores. there is no such thing as a 10 pt touchdown. that isn't gambling that's stupid.
12thMan9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

i am all for going for it on fourth down but damn we should have kicked field goals on the opening drive and final drive vs texas. the first drive we gift wrapped momentum early cause we couldn't make it and at the end of the game from the 1. you have to kick a fg when down by two scores. there is no such thing as a 10 pt touchdown. that isn't gambling that's stupid.


Odds are much better you can kick a long FG than score a Hail Mary for the last score.
Ronnie '88
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
12thMan9 said:

Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

i am all for going for it on fourth down but damn we should have kicked field goals on the opening drive and final drive vs texas. the first drive we gift wrapped momentum early cause we couldn't make it and at the end of the game from the 1. you have to kick a fg when down by two scores. there is no such thing as a 10 pt touchdown. that isn't gambling that's stupid.


Odds are much better you can kick a long FG than score a Hail Mary for the last score.


your putting the cart before the horse. no points equals no chance of victory. here are no ten point plays.
cs69ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You need 2 scores. We all know there are no 10 point plays!
The odds of short td and a long fg trump the odds of a short fg and a Hail Mary!
CuervoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Certainly no fan of Jimbo's play calling, but he seemed to always have success in short yardage situations with a delayed TE pass play where Max Wright would block and then release on a shallow crossing route while the offense appeared to be selling out on a run play up the middle.

For goodness sake - if Jimbo can run this play successfully and show an iota of creativity, maybe CK could too. Especially for a OC whose philosophy was supposed to favor TEs.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cs69ag said:

You need 2 scores. We all know there are no 10 point plays!
The odds of short td and a long fg trump the odds of a short fg and a Hail Mary!


we can agree to disagree. to me it was a really stupid call but that's okay we probably lose either way.

gigem.
bulverdeaggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the time left on the clock says you kick the FG… it wasn't like there was 45 seconds left… if 45 seconds left yes you go for the TD first then the onside kick and long FG…. but there was almost 5 mins left… you kick the FG first.. stop them.. and you get the ball back with 3+ min left… there is no "hail mary" needed… it was STUPID to not kick the FG on 4th down
Z Team
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If successful noone complains about going for it. The issue is the poor play call. Exactly what the article points out.
RUGuys4Real
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree with Elko, but don't agree with Klein's, 4th & 1, play calling (inside run every time).
I keep thinking Elko is going to have a talking with Klein. Sure would like to hear Klein explain his reasoning.
Hope we go for it, on 4th & 1, every time in Vegas. Let's run inside over and over until we fill our quota for next year.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
After marching to the Texas 10-yard line on our opening drive, we should have kicked the field goal on the first drive to take a 3-0 lead. If we had kicked a field goal on that drive, we would have trailed 17-10 with 4:36 left. Going for the game-tying touchdown would have been the right decision. But because we failed on our previous 4th down attempt, we should have kicked a field goal to cut the deficit to 17-10 with 4:36 left. I understand being aggressive but coming away with zero points when down 10 points with less than 5 minutes left is foolish.
RUGuys4Real
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What do you do for a living?
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.