Did we ever get a good angle at the TD against us? Live, I thought I saw the ball move as well.
classof92 said:
Not saying these guys are experts but the morning radio show The Ticket, called the targeting against the Texas receive more serious.
I wouldn't take that sip seriously. He ignores the 100's of experts saying it was clearly targeting and then wants to use a sip analysis on why the game was fair.Heisenberg01 said:classof92 said:
Not saying these guys are experts but the morning radio show The Ticket, called the targeting against the Texas receive more serious.
Your source of truth is The Ticket! BWAHAHAHA!!!
There might not be a group of men that knows less than that collection. And right now most of their crew is on vacation, so it's likely some board op that they need to fill in until the normal staff of know-nothing hosts get back on air.
May seem that way because you are on an Aggie forum.levypantsEOY said:
Seems a lot more Ags complaining about the non targeting call than Sun Devil fans. Not another group in football so fixated on another program (or its alleged deep state control of every ref and sports network).
Kinda funny and kinda sad.
SA-AG72 said:
Judgement calls open the door for referee bias and we've certainly seen plenty of that with the sips.
Stinky T said:
Then why don't they "let the players determine" every game? Why does that become the priority in playoff games? Taafe actually got away with another targeting earlier. It was the play where he was injured with an obvious neck stinger. He initiated contact with the crown on that play, and suffered a neck injury due to that. Why is targeting out the window in playoff games, but important in all other games? Why are you ok with that?
It's either an obvious target OR a good no call. It cannot be both.classof92 said:
it was an obvious target but a good no call.
AustinAg2K said:
Today's call is up there with the Big 12 Championship where Colt McCoy threw the ball out of bounds to end the game, only to have refs add back a second.