Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Save College Sports (Cody Campbell)

6,286 Views | 44 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by warrington74
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You all saw the commercials of course.

https://www.savingcollegesports.com/




I really don't want to hear about how women's and Olympic sports are at risk when he is forking over millions and millions to red Raider football both to the program and NIL directly when he could just as easily just donate to the U for facilities but then support all the women's and Olympic sports with the NIL $$ he is throwing out for football.


What's the end-game here? My take is that he is trying to get equal TV $$ for all CFB programs as his beloved Texas Technical lags way behind SEC mad B1G teams for conference TV revenue and 3rd tier rights. He wants it to be like the NFL where all teams get the same $$, which would mean North Texas, not just Technical, gets the same amount of TV $$ as Alabama, Ohio State, aTm, Penn State, etc.

This reek of an ulterior motive to help matador football, not women's and Olympic sports….
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He did donate to the facilities and he did donate to NIL for women's sports.

Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So what. I didn't say he didn't. He could fund all the women's and Olympic sports for the $$ he is throwing at raider football.

Anyway, that does not address the question / motive.
Triple-T
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry to break this to you, but most current and former students don't care about women's sports.
Gigem_94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's the one that gave tech a blank check to recruit with. He's just trying to stop the bleeding before he goes bankrupt.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
His wife made him do it…
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He aint going bankrupt....lol, its funny how the money spigot for mens football is being driven by about 30 teams. Everyone wants some of that money. Really need to create a super football conference only for the big teams. Then do their dei money share conference for everyone else.
EllisCoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heard him on the radio, his point is that College Football is the 2nd most popular sport but the #3, the NBA crushes its TV deal compared to the combined conferences TV deals by a lot
I wanna see our defense pissed off, not confused, maybe a little murder in their hearts Reload12, 11/4/11
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No s*** Sherlock. IMHO none of the women's and Olympic sports should not even exist in college athletics. It should be football, men's basketball, maybe women's basketball. Everything else is a $$ loser and a drain that just makes football donations and tickets more expensive (yes I know a few baseball teams break even or make a small profit).
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe to him, me and others on this site and many like it, but I call BS on that. I think he is conflating NFL football with football in general. IF that was true then the TV $$ would already be much higher for CFB than the NBA, as would be average coach salary and cost of commercials, etc. Companies market and advertise where the eyeballs and interest are. TV pays broadcast contact $$ where the eyeballs and interest are. I'm not buying that argument that CFB is the #2 sport, though it certainly is #1 for me and in my house.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No sports endeavor deserves a concession nor is the rent-seeking ever not corrupt.
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jarrin Jay said:

So what. I didn't say he didn't. He could fund all the women's and Olympic sports for the $$ he is throwing at raider football.

Anyway, that does not address the question / motive.


Well, yeah, you actually did.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EllisCoAg said:

Heard him on the radio, his point is that College Football is the 2nd most popular sport but the #3, the NBA crushes its TV deal compared to the combined conferences TV deals by a lot

So, I guess his desired goal is to get legislation enacted that allows the NCAA, or some other body, to take back control over college sports, and sell it as a package like back in the old days, but presumably for more money. Oh, and, by the way, this new organization would probably pay schools like Tech as much as SEC and Big Ten schools.
ccolley68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm ok with his sentiment and agree mostly. I didn't pay attention to the ads and their message, but figure it's not easy to ascertain. I don't like NIL and all the other mess, it's made me really take a step back from college football, but im glad my school is a player in that space. Doesn't mean I have to like it agree with it. And some legislative change to make it somewhat like before I would support.

I still like that with the exception of the top level football schools, and a few basketball schools, the majority of college athletes are scholar athletes, and using their athletic prowess to give the, an opportunity they might not otherwise have to get a top level education.

My thought on it, and it probably wouldn't be very favorable to most, is take the college level back how it was across the board. No NIL, sit out for transfers, etc. Players be actual student athletes. If they want to get paid, they can go pro. There will no longer be any blockades from going pro, even straight out of high school, like basketball was/is. If you think you can be an NFL player out of high school, go for it. But once you make that leap, college is no longer an option. If you wash out of the NFL, have fun going back home and digging ditches. You had your chance, took a bet on yourself, and lost. It won't happen all the time, but it will happen. But if you want to play college ball, there will be rules. You are king of the campus, you can have covered meal plans, get all the free team gear you can stuff your paid for closet with, but you have to make your grades, and you have to stick it out. It's a voluntary thing. You don't have to do it, you have the option to bet on yourself, you just have to live with results of the choice you make, good or bad.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

My take is that he is trying to get equal TV $$ for all CFB programs


SEC &'Big10 wouid never go for that

But he is angling to get tech more money & perhaps a seat at the big boy table if a "super league" develops. Im not certain one will, but Campbell is putting all his cards in hoping it does
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Favorable or not, it's just not realistic. It's never going to be like that.
merch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Too late. "College" football is in name only. With each season anything college about it gets stripped away. It is now officially minor league football.
Nothing looks more foolish than tradition to those who have none.
Eddie Vedder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This article blasts the commercial ad "bullsh.." in the last paragraph

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/cody-campbells-group-launches-tv-blitz-to-save-college-sports
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clap trap from liberal Mike Florio

Quote:

It's up to the NCAA and the universities to fix this themselves. Of course, they don't want to fix it by, for example, doing the right thing and welcoming a nationwide union that would protect the players.


Whether you are for or against the proposed bill and changes, Rest assured, Florio has no clue what the bill says.
TRD-Ferguson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sad but true. What we need now are legit contracts with the players. There needs to be accountability for the money they receive.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

Clap trap from liberal Mike Florio

Quote:

It's up to the NCAA and the universities to fix this themselves. Of course, they don't want to fix it by, for example, doing the right thing and welcoming a nationwide union that would protect the players.


Whether you are for or against the proposed bill and changes, Rest assured, Florio has no clue what the bill says.

Yes, he's as full of BS as Campbell.

The Big Ten, SEC, and other P4 schools are lobbying Congress right now to pass legislation that would, among other things, give a limited anti-trust exemption in order to fully implement the House settlement. The House settlement represents a huge step forward for players, but media folks like Florio are always waiving the union flag and cheering on anything that they see as undermining the capitalists. It happens every time there is a potential work stoppage in any sport.

Campbell is trying to go further than the legislation intended to implement House and turn back the clock to the point where one entity negotiates all college football television rights, so that every member of that entity (read, Texas Tech) gets the same share as every other.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRD-Ferguson said:

Sad but true. What we need now are legit contracts with the players. There needs to be accountability for the money they receive.

100%. Because what NIL is claiming to be is exactly the opposite. Its Pay to play.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TRD-Ferguson said:

Sad but true. What we need now are legit contracts with the players. There needs to be accountability for the money they receive.

you are in luck. you got your wish with revenue sharing.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The notion of a union allows a CBA which effectively grants anti-trust protections.

I'm not a fan of unions but it is the simplest way to solve the problem of the NCAA and its member institutions impoverishing themselves…
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
greg.w.h said:

The notion of a union allows a CBA which effectively grants anti-trust protections.

I'm not a fan of unions but it is the simplest way to solve the problem of the NCAA and its member institutions impoverishing themselves…

It's not quite as simple as that, unfortunately. Congress needs to step in and fill in some blanks, regardless of which direction this thing goes.
Panama Red
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Given he thinks Ted Cruz is the worst congressman, color me skeptical he is "not a fan of unions."

rootube
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Olympic sports are about to get pushed off the CFB gravy train and it's long overdue. There is a reason there isn't a huge TV contract for Olympic sports. It's time they started operating within their own means and not freeloading off football. Where was all this outrage when football coaches were being paid.
rootube
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twk said:

greg.w.h said:

The notion of a union allows a CBA which effectively grants anti-trust protections.

I'm not a fan of unions but it is the simplest way to solve the problem of the NCAA and its member institutions impoverishing themselves…

It's not quite as simple as that, unfortunately. Congress needs to step in and fill in some blanks, regardless of which direction this thing goes.


Like most things in life we would be much better off if congress did NOT step in at all.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rootube said:

twk said:

greg.w.h said:

The notion of a union allows a CBA which effectively grants anti-trust protections.

I'm not a fan of unions but it is the simplest way to solve the problem of the NCAA and its member institutions impoverishing themselves…

It's not quite as simple as that, unfortunately. Congress needs to step in and fill in some blanks, regardless of which direction this thing goes.


Like most things in life we would be much better off if congress did NOT step in at all.

Maybe so, but the Sherman Act has been on the books for what, a century and a half (Sen. Sherman was the brother of William Tecumseh Sherman)? Little bit late to argue for that now.
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No, I didn't. You have reading comprehension problems. Go play in the street.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
no surprise, SEC & Big 10 against this

Panama Red
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He mad.

BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hard to blame him. he knows there is a great danger of tech being on the outside looking in. he will do all he can to make sure they get a seat at the big table when that time comes
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's not completely wrong about what will probably happen to opportunities in other sports. I don't know the solution, but it is a likely outcome.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

hard to blame him. he knows there is a great danger of tech being on the outside looking in. he will do all he can to make sure they get a seat at the big table when that time comes

Burning them publicly is a really stupid thing to do then, especially when his ****hole school brings nothing to the table for the B1G/SEC
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.