How do we match up statistically?

And our ol may be a problem for them. Always important to point out both sides. They haven't faced an OL as good as ours.


Will be a hard fought battle. More worried about Marcel seeing things. Our OL will have good moments too

Bottom line they lost 2 games in the ACC. They have talent, but they aren't a great team. Beck is prone to having a wtf game.

i do think the fact that Beck (and Sayin) is a statue helps, a lot.

The fact that this game is at home really helps. I do expect the first quarter+ is played conservatively by both teams, defensive battle in the first half with desperation for both teams setting in for the second half.

Miami is a tough draw, the tougthest in the first round. I would have preferred to play Alabama but this is going to be a heavy weight fight, it is a shame that it is 11am

Their defense is great while ours appears in complete disarray right now

beerad12man said:

---

The bad:

Their two losses have come against teams that forced 3/4 turnovers each and we don't force many turnovers. Interceptions in specific.

They win the turnover battle more often than not and we lose it more often than not.

Their run defense is as good as any we have faced.

The good:

Their run offense isn't great and Beck doesn't make up for it with his legs. While we have had our issues against the run, in general, we usually give up 2-3 big plays a game to a running back but then can shut them down for most of the game. Most of our biggest issues defensively have come against mobile qbs.

Our OL is likely the best Miami will have faced

Our WRs should have an advantage against their DBs if Marcel finds them

Moss likely back maybe boosting our run game

---

Just curious but what makes you think Moss will be back?

TexasAggie_97 said:

---

beerad12man said:

---

The bad:

Their two losses have come against teams that forced 3/4 turnovers each and we don't force many turnovers. Interceptions in specific.

They win the turnover battle more often than not and we lose it more often than not.

Their run defense is as good as any we have faced.

The good:

Their run offense isn't great and Beck doesn't make up for it with his legs. While we have had our issues against the run, in general, we usually give up 2-3 big plays a game to a running back but then can shut them down for most of the game. Most of our biggest issues defensively have come against mobile qbs.

Our OL is likely the best Miami will have faced

Our WRs should have an advantage against their DBs if Marcel finds them

Moss likely back maybe boosting our run game

---

Just curious but what makes you think Moss will be back?

---

Before the sip game, Elko said he'd return this season. Hopefully that means for Miami. Would love to have him and Scooby back!

Our defense does seem to have a distinct uptick in defending pocket passers vs those who can take off and run like Green and Manning.

Txhuntr said:

---

Bottom line they lost 2 games in the ACC. They have talent, but they aren't a great team. Beck is prone to having a wtf game.

---

As does Marcel unfortunately. So whichever QB shows up for each team will determine most of it.

In the 90s, no one cooler than Will Smith!

aggiehawg said:

---

Txhuntr said:

---

Bottom line they lost 2 games in the ACC. They have talent, but they aren't a great team. Beck is prone to having a wtf game.

---

As does Marcel unfortunately. So whichever QB shows up for each team will determine most of it.

---

It's simpler than that. Both are really good and can be elite in clean pockets.

Both can be erratic and make terrible game changing mistakes when pressured.

At least Marcel has the scrambling ability.

Over here waiting on spreadsheet

Miami held jeremiyah love to 33 yards on 19 carries

Their defense is elite elite

When I saw who we were playing, I realized that was it for us. If the same team that played three of the last four quarters shows up, we're done, and I have a sneaking suspicion that's who shows up. Would've been nice to have had a Tulane or JMU for the first round. Oh well... maybe they'll surprise us.

Txhuntr said:

---

Bottom line they lost 2 games in the ACC. They have talent, but they aren't a great team. Beck is prone to having a wtf game.

---

QBs do not have wtf games against us.

They have get right games.

Heineken-Ashi said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Txhuntr said:

---

Bottom line they lost 2 games in the ACC. They have talent, but they aren't a great team. Beck is prone to having a wtf game.

---

As does Marcel unfortunately. So whichever QB shows up for each team will determine most of it.

---

It's simpler than that. Both are really good and can be elite in clean pockets.

Both can be erratic and make terrible game changing mistakes when pressured.

At least Marcel has the scrambling ability.

---

Oh, he has the ability. In spades.

The question is whether or not the head coach of K State will allow him to use it or not.

I swear, his legs are a MAJOR advantage for us, but Klein seems to want to not use it for whatever reason.

4 said:

---

Txhuntr said:

---

Bottom line they lost 2 games in the ACC. They have talent, but they aren't a great team. Beck is prone to having a wtf game.

---

QBs do not have wtf games against us.

They have get right games.

---

not sure I agree, several wtf games against aTm this year

4 said:

---

Txhuntr said:

---

Bottom line they lost 2 games in the ACC. They have talent, but they aren't a great team. Beck is prone to having a wtf game.

---

QBs do not have wtf games against us.

They have get right games.

---

who besides Warby P had a "get right game" vs. us?

jaypunkrawk said:

---

When I saw who we were playing, I realized that was it for us. If the same team that played three of the last four quarters shows up, we're done, and I have a sneaking suspicion that's who shows up. Would've been nice to have had a Tulane or JMU for the first round. Oh well... maybe they'll surprise us.

---

How much money are you putting on Miami?

davinhalcyon said:

---

Our defense does seem to have a distinct uptick in defending pocket passers vs those who can take off and run like Green and Manning.

---

We overload gaps to get pressure. Whether that's something specifically called each play by coached or something our DL has been given freedom to do the big plays almost always seem to be a RB or QB through a completely unfilled gap. It's been very successful in disrupting passing games, but leaves us vulnerable to QB scrambles. IMO Elko sounds like he'll be tweaking that a bit in his interviews since tu game.

Bob Knights Liver said:

---

davinhalcyon said:

---

Our defense does seem to have a distinct uptick in defending pocket passers vs those who can take off and run like Green and Manning.

---

We overload gaps to get pressure. Whether that's something specifically called each play by coached or something our DL has been given freedom to do the big plays almost always seem to be a RB or QB through a completely unfilled gap. It's been very successful in disrupting passing games, but leaves us vulnerable to QB scrambles. IMO Elko sounds like he'll be tweaking that a bit in his interviews since tu game.

---

given our next two opponent qbs give bernie kosar vibes, lets dance with what brung us


curious is anyone has insight on how / why SMU was able to beat Miami?

I don't disagree, I love the aggressive approach. We'll see a wrinkle or three on defense to try to take advantage of anyone trying to use tu game as a playbook.

DimebagsGhost said:

---

4 said:

---

Txhuntr said:

---

Bottom line they lost 2 games in the ACC. They have talent, but they aren't a great team. Beck is prone to having a wtf game.

---

QBs do not have wtf games against us.

They have get right games.

---

who besides Warby P had a "get right game" vs. us?

---

Even counting him, we haven't had a 300 yard passing game against us all season. Manning was 14/29, 1 TD for 179 yards, 1yd less than Marcel (who threw 2 INT).

Carr was 20/32, 1 TD, 1 INT for 293 yards appears to be the most.

We match up pretty evenly.

TexAg2019 said:

---

We match up pretty evenly.

---

buckle up, thank god this is at home

Hoping for a cold chilly overcast breezy day with light rain…just like Miami Beach

Bag said:

---

Bob Knights Liver said:

---

davinhalcyon said:

---

Our defense does seem to have a distinct uptick in defending pocket passers vs those who can take off and run like Green and Manning.

---

We overload gaps to get pressure. Whether that's something specifically called each play by coached or something our DL has been given freedom to do the big plays almost always seem to be a RB or QB through a completely unfilled gap. It's been very successful in disrupting passing games, but leaves us vulnerable to QB scrambles. IMO Elko sounds like he'll be tweaking that a bit in his interviews since tu game.

---

given our next two opponent qbs give bernie kosar vibes, lets dance with what brung us


curious is anyone has insight on how / why SMU was able to beat Miami?

---

I asked AI, so take it for what it's worth:

ChatGPT 5.1

Prompt: What can Texas A&M learn from SMU for their playoff game against Miami

Not the best prompt, I admit…

Answer

[CFP GAMEPLAN] Technical Analysis: How Texas A&M Matches Up With Miami

This report outlines a strategy for how Texas A&M can apply the structural lessons from SMU's 2025 win over Miami. The focus is on macro tendencies, matchup inefficiencies, and scheme-level decisions that translate to a playoff environment.



1. Force Miami Into Long, Multi-Play Drives

Miami's offense is most effective when producing explosive plays. When forced into 1012 play drives, their efficiency decreases due to penalties, protection breakdowns, and quarterback decision-making issues.

Defensive Priorities for Texas A&M
Maintain two-high defensive structures early (quarters, cover-2, cover-6 variants).
Prioritize eliminating vertical shots and deep intermediate routes.
Use zone coverage with eyes on the quarterback to increase turnover opportunities.
Employ a controlled spy on scramble downs to prevent off-script explosives.

The goal is to limit Miami to slow, methodical possessions, which historically correlates with lower scoring output.



2. Utilize Post-Snap Safety Rotation to Generate Turnovers

Miami's quarterback has struggled when defenses present one coverage pre-snap and rotate into another post-snap. SMU used this effectively despite limited personnel advantages.

Texas A&M's safeties and linebackers have the athletic profile to expand this approach.

Recommended Rotational Looks
Quarters rotating down to robber
Cover-2 rolling into Tampa-2
Single-high rotating to a buzz safety
Simulated pressures that maintain a four-man rush

These rotations disrupt Miami's timing-based passing concepts and increase interception probability.



3. Target Miami's Intermediate Defensive Zones

SMU exploited Miami's defense by consistently attacking the 1525 yard area behind the linebackers. Miami's linebackers tend to overcommit to play-action, leaving space for crossing concepts and vertical routes from the slot.

Effective Concepts for Texas A&M
Mesh and Y-cross variations
Play-action dig routes
Slot fades and seam routes
Bootleg flood concepts
Running back angle routes against inside linebackers

A&M has superior personnel to SMU in these areas, which increases the projected efficiency of these concepts.



4. Establish a Functional, Not Dominant, Run Game

SMU demonstrated that defeating Miami does not require a high-volume or high-efficiency rushing attack; they produced only 23 rushing yards in their win. What mattered was creating enough run and RPO threat to slow Miami's linebackers and pass rush.

Run Game Objectives
Hold linebackers in conflict with RPO and play-action elements
Use misdirection, jet motion, and counter looks to create hesitation
Limit negative plays rather than chase explosive runs

Texas A&M's goal should be to maintain offensive balance, not to control the game on the ground.



5. Prioritize Red-Zone Defensive Structure

Miami can accumulate yardage but frequently becomes inefficient in the red zone. This pattern includes stalled drives, forced throws, and limited creativity inside the 20.

Red-Zone Defensive Approach
Encourage Miami to attempt low-percentage fade routes
Remove RPO slants and quick hitters from the playbook
Contain the quarterback's scramble lanes
Bracket the tight end or primary red-zone target

A&M's defensive front is structurally sound enough to compress space and reduce scoring efficiency.



6. Manage Game State to Prevent Miami From Achieving Momentum

Miami's offensive consistency deteriorates when trailing or when the game environment requires low-risk, high-discipline football. Texas A&M benefits from a controlled tempo and field-position focused approach.

Strategic Points
Avoid giving Miami short fields
Emphasize early defensive stops
Maintain composure and avoid unnecessary tempo shifts
Force Miami into predictable passing situations in the second half

Miami performs best in open-script, early-game scenarios and significantly worse when playing from behind.



7. Matchup Advantages Favoring Texas A&M

A&M Pass Catchers vs Miami Secondary
Miami's nickel corner is vulnerable to option routes and vertical slot concepts.
Their safeties have shown susceptibility to play-action displacement.
Crossing routes remain the most reliable method for generating separation.

A&M Defensive Line vs Miami Offensive Line
Miami's interior offensive line is inconsistent against twist games and delayed pressures.
Simulated pressure without sacrificing coverage integrity should be effective.

A&M Linebackers vs Miami Run Game
A&M's lateral pursuit is sufficient to eliminate Miami's perimeter run concepts.
Forcing Miami into interior rushing attempts reduces expected success rate.



8. Recommended Game Script for Texas A&M

Early Game
Present two-high looks and eliminate Miami's explosive passing.
Target intermediate passing lanes with structured play-action.
Test Miami's nickel defender early.

Mid Game
Increase rotational coverages and simulated pressures.
Utilize tight ends and running backs in mismatch situations.
Implement selective tempo to prevent Miami substitutions.

Late Game
Force Miami into predictable passing scripts.
Maintain bracket coverage on deep threats.
Control possession and avoid unnecessary risk.



9. Conditions Under Which Texas A&M Is Most Vulnerable

Texas A&M's risk factors mirror SMU's:
1. Allowing multiple explosive plays (40+ yards).
2. Becoming one-dimensional on offense early.
3. Losing the turnover margin by more than one possession.

Avoiding these situations significantly increases win probability.



Summary

SMU provided a clear schematic precedent for limiting Miami's offensive strengths and exploiting their defensive vulnerabilities. Texas A&M possesses superior personnel and can apply these principles more consistently:
Limit explosive plays
Force long drives
Use post-snap coverage rotation
Attack intermediate zones
Maintain red-zone discipline
Manage game state effectively

This approach aligns with both available data and Miami's 2025 performance trends.

Bag said:

---

Bob Knights Liver said:

---

davinhalcyon said:

---

Our defense does seem to have a distinct uptick in defending pocket passers vs those who can take off and run like Green and Manning.

---

We overload gaps to get pressure. Whether that's something specifically called each play by coached or something our DL has been given freedom to do the big plays almost always seem to be a RB or QB through a completely unfilled gap. It's been very successful in disrupting passing games, but leaves us vulnerable to QB scrambles. IMO Elko sounds like he'll be tweaking that a bit in his interviews since tu game.

---

given our next two opponent qbs give bernie kosar vibes, lets dance with what brung us


curious is anyone has insight on how / why SMU was able to beat Miami?

---

SMU started in the hole after a fumble and score by Miami. SMU scored after that and then they kept it within 1 score for the rest of the game.

SMU's QB got 365 yards in the air even though 3rd down efficiency was under 25%. Also won the turnover battle. Rushing was virtually non existent. Kept penalties low.

this game is going to be a war.

Not exactly sure how I feel, I would feel a lot better if it was at night

Gotta add we have part time OC to the bad

Miami mirrors their coach: tough, mean, and skilled on both sides of the line. They're quick, pursue well, and hit hard. In 12 games, they've have 91 penalties for 752 yards (much more disciplined during Cristobal's tenure). Overall, a formidable opponent.

While Miami never allowed more than 24 points in regulation all season long, our defense has struggled our last two SEC games: 23 offensive points (the other 7 came from a fumble return) allowed to South Carolina in the 1st half and 24 points to Texas in the 2nd half. Also, we lost the turnover margin by a combined 6-2 in those two games.

However, Miami has played 8 home games and just 4 true road games.

28-22 win at 5-7 (2-6 ACC) Florida State at Virginia Tech (3-9)
26-20 overtime loss at 8-4 (6-2 ACC) SMU
34-17 win at 3-9 (2-6 ACC) Virgina Tech
38-7 win at 8-4 (6-2 ACC) Pittsburgh

This will be Miami's toughest road game by a landslide. We went undefeated at home for the first time since a 4-0 home record in 2020 and just the second time since 1999. This is the first time we finished a full, seven-game home schedule undefeated.

We must win the turnover margin and avoid special teams' miscues.