1. Indiana
2. Miami
3. Ole Miss
4. Ohio State
5. Georgia
6. Oregon
7. Texas A&M
8. Notre Dame
9. Alabama
10. Texas Tech
11. tu (outside looking in of playoffs)
12. Oklahoma

is indiana the real iphone of cfb

Who wants to tell him?

Georgia should have been ahead of Ohio St.

Tech at 12.

OP is drunk and it shows.

The regular season results have to mean something, so the only changes I would have made are Tech should have been the lowest seed of all one loss teams - so 7. And Ole Miss should have been 4. Everyone else would have been where they should have been after those changes.

And Tech needs to be told that this will continue until they put some meat on that pathetic schedule they have.

Heisenberg01 said:

---

1. Indiana
2. Miami
3. Ole Miss
4. Ohio State
5. Georgia
6. Oregon
7. Texas A&M
8. Notre Dame
9. Alabama
10. Texas Tech
11. tu (outside looking in of playoffs)
12. Oklahoma

---

Indiana
Miami
Ole Miss
Texas A&M

No way A&M should be #7. For 1 loss teams, they should have been ranked before all others except Ole Miss.

1. Indiana
2. Miami

FIFY

Awesome even more of an impact on the playoffs given to the committee and their somewhat arbitrary rankings

Tech had no business in the playoff at all

Would you prefer 2 loss ND or 3 loss tu

Stinky T said:

---

The regular season results have to mean something, so the only changes I would have made are Tech should have been the lowest seed of all one loss teams - so 7. And Ole Miss should have been 4. Everyone else would have been where they should have been after those changes.

And Tech needs to be told that this will continue until they put some meat on that pathetic schedule they have.

---

Counting wins vs different schedules means yiu cant judge based on wins and losses. Because they are not equal


W/L = Your Team / Your Schedule

And with ao few cross conference games its impossible.


Id be fine using a power ranking instead of a committee, like Sagarin