TAMUallen said:

---

aggiedad7 said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

His revshare portion is maybe 100k-500k. Nil will make up the other portion of the 4 million contract. Example 500k Rev share 3.5 million NIL.

---

Where are you seeing these details?

---

ON3 has Coleman 2.5 - 3M post signing. Not sure what Tech offered nor where the 4M comes from short of here. The real answer is nobody except his agent and him know.

---

Yep, but im sure that foias are out against all schools anyway. No reason to to not find out what your school is officially giving

---

You don't need to do a records request to know what each school in SEC or Big 10 is officially giving in revenue sharing.

Whaler said:

---

I say Good Bull. We should swamp tu with freedom of information requests... keep 'em busy, and poke our nose into anything that is of interest to us.

---

And they would do the same to us simply wasting Texas taxpayer money.

It was plain to see that NIL would result in massive cheating at a level never before seen. Many wanted it because the poor athletes were being taken advantage of, despite the fact that no one cares about any player if the University's name isn't on their jersey. This is what we get. It isn't NIL, it is pay-for-play. College football sucks compared to what it used to be and is now little more than a lower level professional league It is what it is. Just accept it. .

Look out sips.

Schools are not stupid. They will pay the players what they want, but keep the paper trail nice and clean. Even if they made a mistake, the NCAA is completely impotent to enforce anything. When it comes to NIL, the NCAA loses every single case.

The reality is that we are back in the wild west days. Think 70s and 80s SWC. Programs that blatantly break the rules like Ole Miss are able to do so openly and without consequences. The idea that some Aggie is going to weaponize FOIA requests, solve the case, and get tu busted has no basis in reality.

This thread isn't complete without