***** Official USMNT vs Mexico Nations League Semi-final thread *****

27,781 Views | 483 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Rudyjax
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watching on delay, this ref is so out of his depth.. completely let the game get away from him by not being proactive. Finally gets the red right for Mexico, and then gives Wes a red while he has 2 dudes wrestling with him. Somehow those are the only cards. Who is this idiot Unkel giving her 'expert' opinion all game, no one wants to hear them just always defend the ref no matter what.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Math guy is right, the ref was calling an ok game up until about 50 minutes in. Then he didn't have the confidence to keep the game under control, and ruined it
The good news is we have quality depth, the bad news is without Tyler Adams it really hurts to lose Wes
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also we completely destroyed them
La Bamba
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The kid at the end though
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for reminding me the ups and downs of VAR. on one hand, we had absolutely atrocious var decisions on cards and on the other var corrects this offside decision that wasn't even remotely close to offside.
gougler08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just like to wake up this morning and say "go **** yourself Mexico"
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
3rd goal was great work and a great ball in from Dest, well-timed run by Pepi and poor timing by the MX defender stepping up a fraction of a second too late, keeping him onside.

I think it was pretty close and when these go to VAR, it depends on the frame they stop the playback for the ball in on whether it's rules on or off side.

On this one, should the AR raise his flag and let VAR review for an obvious mistake or should he let it go and let VAR review for an obvious mistake?

It makes the most sense to me to leave your arm down and let it go since all goals are reviewed anyway and if Pepi hadn't scored, it's most likely a change of possession to MX anyway. That being said, given the pace of the run and the bad step up to draw him off by the Mx defender, it would be easy for some ARs to see that much space and want to raise the flag.


My beef last night was with the head ref for letting trash Mexicans do what they do and losing control of the match and the 4th official for calling in a RC via VAR on Weston.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

On this one, should the AR raise his flag and let VAR review for an obvious mistake or should he let it go and let VAR review for an obvious mistake?

It makes the most sense to me to leave your arm down and let it go since all goals are reviewed anyway and if Pepi hadn't scored, it's most likely a change of possession to MX anyway. That being said, given the pace of the run and the bad step up to draw him off by the Mx defender, it would be easy for some ARs to see that much space and want to raise the flag.

You're right. ARs are told to keep the flag down at all costs in that situation and only raise it after the goal scoring opportunity is over. That can lead to other issues (needless injuries for example) but he did exactly what he was supposed to do. If he had raised his flag too early, he wipes away what would have been a legitimate scoring opportunity.
gougler08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, the goal is a perfect example of what VAR should be used for...the red card, not so much
MAROON
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tres a cero for El Tri. Nothing could be more poetic.

That was a domination like I've never seen from a US team against Mexico or against any team that is considered to have a pulse
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a fun match! Helps that USA absolutely destroyed LLL-Tri but man, that was entertaining!

Loved the US attack. Not perfect but the pieces are there and with time to gel, this can be a very exciting and potent attack.

USA just totally outclassed MX tonight. Question for the board: how many of Mexico's first teamers were omitted? Chucky, Lainez, dos Santos, Jimenez, who else? There was a huge gap in quality, just wondering how much was due to Mexico's selection being newbies.

Regarding the buffoonery on the pitch, as has been stated - ref lost control. BUT, it doesn't help when USA players are providing excuses to get red-carded. In McKinnie's case, I guess he'd just had one too many throat-grabbings or face-shovings at the hands of a trashy Mexican player and finally snapped. I mean, he's been abused more times than I can count in matches against MX, so I'm chalking up his response to a preponderance of prior assaults.

Dest's red is less explicable/excusable, in my opinion, because it was a result of him being goaded into the send-off. He has to let that shove to his face go and allow VAR to sort things out. The person who retaliates gets popped. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.

I've said it before, I'll say it again and I'll keep saying it until proven wrong: Mexican soccer fans are the trashies in CONCACAF and challenge for worst anywhere. You know going in there will be chants of puto, beer cups and water bottles tossed onto the pitch, idiots kicked out of the stands. Its just what their fans bring to the table, and its 100 percent consistent and its just total garbage.

Finally, F--K OFF to the US Soccer Federation. Retreading GGG after all the BS the last 8 months is just a slap in the face to the American soccer fan.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Question for the board: how many of Mexico's first teamers were omitted? Chucky, Lainez, dos Santos, Jimenez, who else? There was a huge gap in quality, just wondering how much was due to Mexico's selection being newbies.
Tecatito was missing, think he's recovering from injury as well.

There are two problems for LLL Tri that I see:
1. They never integrated the younger players into the pool as part of WC2022 cycle. What you're seeing is basically what we went through as part of 2019-2021 which is a lot of new faces with minimal international experience.
2. Structurally, their league/federation doesn't let many of their talented players go overseas and get the experience in the ultra competitive leagues in Europe. If you look at the starting lineup last night, only one US starter (Miles) does not plays in the top leagues in Europe while majority of the LLL Tri starters plays in Liga MX.

Historically they've had the tactical and technical edge over USMNT (due to Liga MX being around for 80 yrs) and we've compensated with athleticism and fighting spirit. Now our players have as much if not more tactical and technical skills with the athleticism edge; it isn't a wonder that we're seeing a string of positive results.

Edit - One thing I forgot to add for point 2 is the depth that we have now. We have players on the bench that are playing in top European leagues. Scally, Luca, Weah/Gio (when Adams is healthy), Aaronson, Richards/Trusty/CCV/McKenzie.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
Knucklesammich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggies1322 said:

fig96 said:

Aggies1322 said:

fig96 said:

Aggies1322 said:

fig96 said:

Aggies1322 said:

Good to hear some lady talk about how VAR is doing it's job tho.. bimbo
Comments like this don't help anything.

What? What am I hurting? It was my honest assessment..
Who tf calls a woman a bimbo? Cmon man.

Sorry.. unqualified fool* better?
Not being a sexist *******? Yeah, big improvement.

I'm not sexist.. I hate incompetence of any gender. Hers is noteworthy because she was almost certainly a diversity hire..

Look at her bio...she's been a practicing lawyer for years and has 20+ years as a soccer ref at a ton of different levels but yeah because she's a woman it must be a diversity pick. Call her a fool, call her a moron, disagree but pull back on the terminology.

As an aside,I have always found it ironic that a board created to support a women's team hammers any female centric post. Be it the blued post about not being able to hire a "real" coach because of the USWNT lawsuit (don't know the validity of this or not). I mean the most stickied post is to remind dudes not to be creepy about college age girls that look good in shorts.

She's no different than any of the rules wonks in any other sport...they'll lean to the letter of the law and explain what is and isn't allowed. It always makes the process feel like exactly that a process. Be it a catch or targeting in football or whatever call in soccer.

Do I agree in theory with both of our red cards? No but they are red cards none the less. We got baited and took the bait. The rules are clear. Should others have gotten cards? I think so but I don't know how much leeway VAR has there. The ultimate fault lies with the ref by not controlling the game earlier.

The one on Gio was certainly a yellow and couldn't disagree more, since IMO he clearly lined him up and led with his shoulder. I'm not an expert on how much leeway VAR has to overturn the ref's call on the field in this situation but it seemed pretty clear live and even more clear in replay.
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Knucklesammich said:

Aggies1322 said:

fig96 said:

Aggies1322 said:

fig96 said:

Aggies1322 said:

fig96 said:

Aggies1322 said:

Good to hear some lady talk about how VAR is doing it's job tho.. bimbo
Comments like this don't help anything.

What? What am I hurting? It was my honest assessment..
Who tf calls a woman a bimbo? Cmon man.

Sorry.. unqualified fool* better?
Not being a sexist *******? Yeah, big improvement.

I'm not sexist.. I hate incompetence of any gender. Hers is noteworthy because she was almost certainly a diversity hire..

Look at her bio...she's been a practicing lawyer for years and has 20+ years as a soccer ref at a ton of different levels but yeah because she's a woman it must be a diversity pick. Call her a fool, call her a moron, disagree but pull back on the terminology.

As an aside,I have always found it ironic that a board created to support a women's team hammers any female centric post. Be it the blued post about not being able to hire a "real" coach because of the USWNT lawsuit (don't know the validity of this or not). I mean the most stickied post is to remind dudes not to be creepy about college age girls that look good in shorts.

She's no different than any of the rules wonks in any other sport...they'll lean to the letter of the law and explain what is and isn't allowed. It always makes the process feel like exactly that a process. Be it a catch or targeting in football or whatever call in soccer.

Do I agree in theory with both of our red cards? No but they are red cards none the less. We got baited and took the bait. The rules are clear. Should others have gotten cards? I think so but I don't know how much leeway VAR has there. The ultimate fault lies with the ref by not controlling the game earlier.

The one on Gio was certainly a yellow and couldn't disagree more, since IMO he clearly lined him up and led with his shoulder. I'm not an expert on how much leeway VAR has to overturn the ref's call on the field in this situation but it seemed pretty clear live and even more clear in replay.


VAR had absolutely every right to stop play and sort through all of the cards that should have been handed out. But surprise surprise they didn't because Mexico would be down to like 8 men at that point. The head ref made the decision not to card and send of Antuna thinking it would cause too much chaos. And it actually allowed the chaos to unfold.

But that's concacrap and unfortunately our soccer federation is absolutely too inept to force changes.

Also the rules lady absolutely got it wrong on the Antuna challenge as well.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sure this has been discussed but what happens when Mexico is in the World Cup soon and need a result to advance? Say they are tied and ahead on differential. Can the fans get the game called with their chants for the team to advance on a technicality? Or will officials empty the stadium before continuing?

Really interested in how their fans might affect a big game. At some point Mexico has be disqualified for their neanderthal followers to get the message.
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

But surprise surprise they didn't because Mexico would be down to like 8 men at that point.
You mean 8 players total, bench and field combined.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marvin said:

I'm sure this has been discussed but what happens when Mexico is in the World Cup soon and need a result to advance? Say they are tied and ahead on differential. Can the fans get the game called with their chants for the team to advance on a technicality? Or will officials empty the stadium before continuing?

Really interested in how their fans might affect a big game. At some point Mexico has be disqualified for their neanderthal followers to get the message.
Nothing serious will ever happen. They might be forced to playing in empty stadiums but that'll be about the worst extent of it.

What these Mexican fans should do is take a page out of the MAGA playbook and come up for some code word for their "P-t-" chant like the whole "Let's go Brandon" thing. Something catchy. My suggestion for their new chant: Bud Light!
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Y'all think we appeal the Reds for McKennie and Dest?
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dest - no
McKennie - yes
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KCup17 said:

Y'all think we appeal the Reds for McKennie and Dest?


The reds were a bit harsh but I like it as a learning tool for those two. They need to learn to not engage, keep their heads.
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't understand why Sanchez didn't get a red for putting his head into McKennie in the first place.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There should have been minimum 3 other players tossed if you're going to eject McKennie there.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KCup17 said:

I didn't understand why Sanchez didn't get a red for putting his head into McKennie in the first place.


It's pretty clear at that stage he was keeping it even. 10v10 and later 9v9. He chose the path of least resistance.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

There should have been minimum 3 other players tossed if you're going to eject McKennie there.
100% agreed. It's worse that it was VAR.
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Referees are too afraid of letting the laws of the game actually decide the game. More Mexicans weren't sent off only because a red card for the USA was evening the teams back out while making it 10 vs 8 would have led to like a 10-0 one way track meet
Knucklesammich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

Quote:

But surprise surprise they didn't because Mexico would be down to like 8 men at that point.
You mean 8 players total, bench and field combined.
Weren't a couple of water bottles thrown or were those from the stands? I was surprised more didn't get handed out for bench players.

PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KCup17 said:

I didn't understand why Sanchez didn't get a red for putting his head into McKennie in the first place.
just crazy
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Positive talking point...Pulisic just dominated that game, thats a good advertisement for a club looking to make a move for him
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

KCup17 said:

I didn't understand why Sanchez didn't get a red for putting his head into McKennie in the first place.
Or the guy that shoved Dest in the side of the head, how is that different from what Dest did back to him?


That guy was sent too. It kept it even and 9v9.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just how bad was the Mexican team last night?

Quote:

Unable to do much else in response, Mexico would go on to finish the match with more reds than shots on target.
Woof

LLL Tri Fiasco
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the bottles were coming from the stands but can't be sure.

Balogun's probably thinking OMG, what did I get myself into?
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

Positive talking point...Pulisic just dominated that game, thats a good advertisement for a club looking to make a move for him
The way he found another gear and just dusted a defender on multiple occasions is seriously impressive.
Texan_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mexico is 2018 US qualifying on steroids. Obviously there is a whole list of problems and they'd have been better off playing the older guys like HH, guardado, etc. they'll be back, but I think the torch has been passed to US and Canada.

Weird timing for the ggg release. Gotta be his camp pushing because it made nobody happy. Even asking Weah, who had said he hoped he was coming back, responded with "well that's something" last night.

Mexico is in shambles though. We played their game still won, though. Canada will be a better class and Pulisic and will be a good game.
Cowboy Curtis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is Berhalter going to blow up this newfound team chemistry?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.