Interesting article on espn

682 Views | 12 Replies | Last: 15 yr ago by MassAggie97
Dropkicked Murphy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nba/columns/story?columnist=forsberg_chris&id=6078273

The San Antonio Spurs have far and away the best record in basketball, but don't be deceived. The Boston Celtics are far and away the best team in basketball as the calendar flips to February.

After Boston's 109-96 thumping of the Los Angeles Lakers on Sunday at the Staples Center, there can be no argument. The Celtics wrapped up the month of January with a glossy 5-1 record against teams with records better than .500, including a 105-103 triumph over those very Spurs (which, if not for some careless final moments, wouldn't have been as close as the final score suggests).

It's clear the Celtics have saved their best basketball for top competition. For the season, they have a 17-5 mark overall against teams above .500. In fact, against the seven other Eastern Conference teams that would currently qualify for the postseason, Boston boasts a 13-2 mark, falling only to Chicago (the second night of a back-to-back to wrap up a slate of six games in nine days in January) and Orlando (a Christmas Day battle in which Boston fumbled away a double-digit, second-half lead).



[+] EnlargeScott Cunningham/Getty Images
Delonte West, who's expected to be back from a fractured wrist in late February, is the X-factor for the Celtics down the stretch.
Boston is not too shabby against the potential West playoff squads either, with a 6-3 mark against the eight current qualifiers (those losses being to Oklahoma City, New Orleans and Dallas). For what it's worth, the Spurs' seven losses this season include Boston, Orlando, Dallas, New York, the L.A. Clippers and a pair against New Orleans.

Give San Antonio credit for feasting on the lesser opponents, a 22-1 record against teams below .500 this season. That's an area where Boston hasn't been able to always keep its focus.

But, heck, before the Celtics even beat his team three weeks ago in a battle of conference juggernauts, Spurs coach Gregg Popovich admitted his team was a cut below Boston.

"We're a significant notch below the big boys, and, of course, Boston being one of the big boys," Popovich said. "Boston [was] third in defensive field goal percentage. Those are the kind of stats we used to have defensively. Right now, I think we're a good basketball team. We have to step up defensively. Luckily, it's early. Maybe I can get these things across."

The scary thing for opponents is that, despite all of Boston's success to this point, the Celtics feel like their best basketball lies ahead. In fact, they've been so riddled by injuries, Boston's biggest concern might simply be getting its ailing players back early enough to allow proper time for its bench to gel.

"Listen, with all the injuries, if you told me that we'd have this record [in late January], I'd take it and run with it," Celtics coach Doc Rivers said. "But my concern is always moving forward. We have to get our team ready [for the postseason] and it's tough to do that when you have all the injuries. When you're playing game-to-game, you feel like you're stuck in place and you can't move forward. That's my biggest concern. Especially with our bench. We have to get our bench intact in time, so they can get used to playing with each other."

It's ironic that Rivers is so concerned about the bench, because it's his starting five that Boston has not had in place all season. The team will soon be able to trot out that familiar five once center Kendrick Perkins rejoins the starting unit . He has four games under his belt since returning in late January from offseason ACL surgery.


More on the Celtics
Keep on top of the Green throughout the season with ESPNBoston.com's Chris Forsberg. Blog

• Send Chris a question

Once that happens, the Celtics will have the luxury of shifting Shaquille O'Neal to a reduced-minute reserve role. A second unit that has struggled to score with consistency should benefit from having one of the league's most dominant scorers ever in the post, generating a newfound ability to simply chuck the ball into the post and hope for easy points or a foul when the offense goes stagnant.

Delonte West (fractured right wrist) has appeared in only five games this season and is expected to be back in late February. He's the X-factor in all of this as Boston pegged him as the key to that second unit that desperately needs a solid ball-handler (something the team has sought around the trade deadline in seasons past).

Jermaine O'Neal (left knee soreness) is in the middle of a four-week strengthening process for his ailing knee that Celtics president of basketball operations Danny Ainge adamantly believes will allow him to be a contributing player over the final months of the season.

"I don't know when [Boston will have a healthy roster], but it'd be nice to see [Shaquille O'Neal], Baby, Marquis and Delonte playing together," Rivers said. "In a lot of ways, that group is new to each other, so we have to get them to play together and show them what we need them to do."


[+] EnlargeBrian Babineau/NBAE/Getty Images
Having leaned on Semih Erden (above) and Luke Harangody at times this season, the return of veteran talent makes the C's bench that much deeper.
It seems impossible, but the Celtics might actually find another gear when that happens. Having leaned on rookies Semih Erden and Luke Harangody at times this season, the return of veteran talent makes the Boston pine that much deeper.

With a three-game cushion over Chicago and Miami in the East entering Monday's action, Boston will eventually find itself concerned with seeding and how the playoff bracket will shake down. They are cognizant of it, especially knowing how home-court advantage might have benefited them in Game 7 of the NBA Finals last year against the Lakers.

But for now, the Celtics contend that they're not worried about anything but improving their own level of play and consistency -- which is no easy task when you're a team shooting a league-best 50.1 percent from the floor while also limiting opponents to the fewest points per game in the NBA (91.6 per contest).

Yes, if the Celtics play to their potential, they feel like they should win every night, regardless of opponent or circumstance. And that's exactly how they should feel. After all, Boston is the best team in basketball.

PLUM LOCO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SPURS > Rodney Dangerfield

No Respect...
MassAggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
The Boston Celtics are far and away the best team in basketball as the calendar flips to February.

This is just poor journalism. The Spurs laid a beatdown on LA a couple weeks ago just like Boston did. The Spurs were competitive with Boston in their own place, despite the fact that it was the 2nd night of a back-to-back in different cities for the Spurs. The Spurs have the best record in the NBA by 4 games and have a much better SOS than the Celtics.

Better team? Who knows. But "far and away" is a stupid way to describe it no matter who you favor. Oh lookie....the author of that little gem used to work for Boston.com and the Boston Globe.

[This message has been edited by MassAggie97 (edited 2/1/2011 1:39p).]
claym711
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Spurs' seven losses this season include Boston, Orlando, Dallas, New York, the L.A. Clippers and a pair against New Orleans.


The Celtics' have lost to Dallas, OKC, Orlando, New Orleans, Chicago, Phoenix, and some real chitty teams.


So, your argument is that, although they have a "far and away" better SOS, because the Spurs' 7 losses have come against potential playoff teams, even though Boston has lost to 6 potential playoff teams + some other chitty teams, that Boston is better?

Thats a real real weak argument.
atfarmer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boston is better statistically, but they've played a weaker schedule by those same stats.

Still, Boston plays great defense and, though they don't have as much offensive firepower as SA, they play very efficiently on that end.

Let's see where SA is when the playoffs roll around. With their offense, I think they need to have a top 6-8 defense to be a true contender. They're sitting at top 10-12 right now and I don't think that's good enough to run the playoff gauntlet.

One last note: Boston is really old. Garnett has been battling injuries for over a year and is hanging on by a thread. Pierce and Allen are deadly, but they're both 34+ as well. They're a little bad luck away from being a good team, but not a contender.

[This message has been edited by atfarmer (edited 2/1/2011 4:18p).]
Ag Natural
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd probably favor Boston over San Antonio right now because of their experience. But Boston is not "far and away" better.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The "far and away" comment was just stupid and clearly the entire article was designed to get people's attention by making an outrageous argument. Is Boston better than SA? Maybe, maybe not. For every point he brought up there are a couple of counter points. Mainly though, how you can say a team that has 11 losses is clearly superior to a team with 7 losses is just asinine, especially because the 7 loss team is rolling right now.
Post removed:
by user
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I'd probably favor Boston over San Antonio right now because of their experience.

San Antonio players have 11 rings and hundreds of playoff games under their belts. They can't be crusty old veterans and inexperienced, not with 4 rings in recent history and all those players back from title runs.


And the writer of that article is a homer. The strength of his argument is that Boston barely beat San Antonio in Boston, and that Boston blew out LAL in LA even though the Spurs did it too. I'm not sure I wouldn't favor Boston in a seven game series, but it's close and right now the evidence says San Antonio is at least as good.
sharkenleo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mostly disagree with that article, but the fact is San Antonio and Boston are the 2 best teams in basketball right now, with no one else close.

Heat and Lakers are dangerous when they turn it on, but other than that, these are the 2 teams that look most likely to play in the finals.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would like to applaud guitarsoup for not using the laughing/crying emoticon yet on this thread. He probably doesn't know what it's about yet.
MassAggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Boston is better statistically

How do you figure?
MassAggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This article was very timely. The Celtics are in the midst of a 6-4 stretch including losses to the Wizards and Bobcats. They are currently 5 games behind the Spurs and are in one of the weakest divisions in the NBA.

The Spurs are in the midst of an 8-2 stretch with losses to very solid teams, one on the 2nd game in 24 hours. They play in the toughest division in basketball, top to bottom. They have only a single loss, all season long, to a team under 0.500, which also came on the 2nd night of a back-to-back.

Yeah, the Celtics are "far and away" the best team as the calendar flips to February. Too bad nobody told them the season continues through June.
MassAggie97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh, did I mention the Spurs have a higher margin of victory and a much higher SOS?
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.