If you're Philly, you have a potential 20-10 big to build around, and if he leaves, fugg it b/c you weren't going to win anyways and you shed Iguodala's contract. Makes sense.
Denver - don't see how Iguodala makes you appreciably better, but OK.
Orlando - you have a gun to your head. You're going to let Howard walk for nothing to "prove a point", or take the best deal you can get? You'd think you could get a young stud or lottery pick, but maybe not, or at least unload Turkoglu's deal, but again maybe you can't. Afflalo is a good player, Vucevic is an OK big, and you get Harkless (who I think sucks but is a mid-1st) and 3 1st rounders (all crappy, but maybe the Philly pick turns into a lottery pick in 2-3 years as it becomes less protected as it rolls over?). I don't see how you fault Orlando.
LA - Bynum and a crap 1st for Howard. Thanks. More reason to psychotically hate them. Only good news is they still can't guard the perimeter, though they can protect the rim better with Howard. But will douchy Superman be prone to foul trouble when Westbrook, Harden, Wade, James blow by their geriatric guards/wings?