quote:
And if the sluggers start dropping down some bunts eventually the defenses will stop going to the shift against them.
I think better bunting could definitely slow or reverse the growing use of the defensive shift, but I'm not sure hitters can bunt the shift out of the game or get all that close.
I think a lot of coaches would have been very happy if they could get a slugger to drop a bunt single.
When sluggers swing away against a shift, they still occasionally hit home runs or find a hole for a double or something. If they bunt, worst case is you have a guy that probably doesn't run very well on first base.
Plus, as soon as a defense chooses not to shift because a guy laid down a bunt, the slugger swings away and might beat their "regular" defense- which is the what you were trying to stop when you shifted your defense in the first place.
Its a secondary part of the strategy, I admit, but the shift isn't just to get outs, its to try to get sluggers to change their swing, or maybe even just bunt so that they're not hitting home runs or multi-base hits.
Barring rule changes, the only way the shift will ever fully go away is when a hitter is equally as strong or weak hitting to left, right, center, center-right, center-left, etc... and changing the defense doesn't change their hitting approach in any way. Until then, there will be some statistical reason to adjust the defense, sometimes even as much severely as we see in that picture.