All we had to do was wash the Houston off of him and, voila, gold glove left fielder with speed and power paid for by a division rival.
That's the way baseball go.
That's the way baseball go.
quote:No, we simply state the fact that the Astros organization is paying his salary. As for wgaf...I imagine both the Astros and Rangers do since they are for-profit businesses.
"Astros are paying for him"
WGAF? You clowns act like the fans have to mail a check every week.
quote:The Houston Astros.
"Astros are paying for him"
WGAF?
quote:Which is almost 1/2 the HR production in 85 games with Houston and almost 1/4 of the RBI production.quote:Not to mention, he now has 8 RBI and 2 HR halfway through his 7th game.quote:
the 0- 20 gaps in between his occasional hits are killers.
They've won 6 out of 7 since he joined, and are leading #8.
I'd say he isn't "killing" anything at this point.
quote:
Gomez was bad for a lineup that is desperate for production......like Houston.
Put him #8 in this lineup, have another team pay for it, and it isn't so bad.
quote:When your team is known for not spending money, it should hurt when you realize you're spending money for another team's player.
"Astros are paying for him"
WGAF? You clowns act like the fans have to mail a check every week.
quote:If you don't think they care about paying him to play for a division rival that you are currently chasing, then I don't know what to say. Sure they knew they'd still have to pay him regardless of who he signed with, but you're kidding yourself if you don't think paying him to play for the Rangers isn't bothering them.
Clearly the Astros didn't GAF since they cut him knowing they would have to pay him.
quote:We don't need him to be great. He's the #8 hitter. 2 HR and 8 RBI in 7 games is plenty fine for what they need from him.
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
quote:Don't forget pretty solid defense.quote:We don't need him to be great. He's the #8 hitter. 2 HR and 8 RBI in 7 games is plenty fine for what they need from him.
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
quote:quote:We don't need him to be great. He's the #8 hitter. 2 HR and 8 RBI in 7 games is plenty fine for what they need from him.
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
quote:Ding ding ding!!quote:quote:We don't need him to be great. He's the #8 hitter. 2 HR and 8 RBI in 7 games is plenty fine for what they need from him.
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
These fangraphs nerds can't wrap their heads around that concept. That or they're trying REALLY hard to pretend this doesn't bother them.
Either way, suck it Houston.
quote:Oh we understand. He was God awful for y'all, and yet he's not for us. For us, he's merely mediocre, and that works just fine.
He was god awful. Why is that so difficult for you to understand? Yeah, it's "bothering" them so much.
quote:Actually "chasing" implies that we're behind. Defending the best record in the AL is more accurate.
You're happy he's gone, we are happy Houston is paying for our 8 hole hitter, your front office "DGAF", so we can stop talking about it. We can focus on chasing best record in the AL and you can focus on your Not So Improbable Wild Card Chase thread.
quote:It's what we got at this point.
Nice sample size you're using there.
quote:
Just looked. He's hitting .153. When has that ever meant mediocre?
quote:This quote has to be from Fangraphs, right?
The 2016 Texas Rangers are making history. Their 30-8 record in one-run games gives them a .789 winning percentage that, if it holds up, would set a record for the best winning percentage in one-run games since 1901. But the Rangers have a not-so-slight problem that could haunt them in the playoffs: performance in one-run games is almost entirely though not exclusively a matter of good timing and luck, not skill.
quote:quote:This quote has to be from Fangraphs, right?
The 2016 Texas Rangers are making history. Their 30-8 record in one-run games gives them a .789 winning percentage that, if it holds up, would set a record for the best winning percentage in one-run games since 1901. But the Rangers have a not-so-slight problem that could haunt them in the playoffs: performance in one-run games is almost entirely though not exclusively a matter of good timing and luck, not skill.
No, that's way too anti-Rangers. Must be the Crawfish Boxes?
Wrong again.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-texas-rangers-are-making-unsustainable-history-in-one-run-games/
More numbers nerds who are just haters, right?
quote:Great job refuting the article! I guess that was too many words for you eh?quote:quote:This quote has to be from Fangraphs, right?
The 2016 Texas Rangers are making history. Their 30-8 record in one-run games gives them a .789 winning percentage that, if it holds up, would set a record for the best winning percentage in one-run games since 1901. But the Rangers have a not-so-slight problem that could haunt them in the playoffs: performance in one-run games is almost entirely though not exclusively a matter of good timing and luck, not skill.
No, that's way too anti-Rangers. Must be the Crawfish Boxes?
Wrong again.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-texas-rangers-are-making-unsustainable-history-in-one-run-games/
More numbers nerds who are just haters, right?
http://imgur.com/a/NkerQ