HOU@TEX Trash Talking Thread

556,714 Views | 3968 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by Charlie Conway
srx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All we had to do was wash the Houston off of him and, voila, gold glove left fielder with speed and power paid for by a division rival.

That's the way baseball go.
ebdb_bnb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Astros are paying for him"

WGAF? You clowns act like the fans have to mail a check every week.
PacifistAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
"Astros are paying for him"

WGAF? You clowns act like the fans have to mail a check every week.
No, we simply state the fact that the Astros organization is paying his salary. As for wgaf...I imagine both the Astros and Rangers do since they are for-profit businesses.
srx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
"Astros are paying for him"

WGAF?
The Houston Astros.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
quote:
the 0- 20 gaps in between his occasional hits are killers.

They've won 6 out of 7 since he joined, and are leading #8.

I'd say he isn't "killing" anything at this point.
Not to mention, he now has 8 RBI and 2 HR halfway through his 7th game.
Which is almost 1/2 the HR production in 85 games with Houston and almost 1/4 of the RBI production.
Cappo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

so much butt hurt around this thread
Player To Be Named Later
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gomez was bad for a lineup that is desperate for production......like Houston.

Put him #8 in this lineup, have another team pay for it, and it isn't so bad.
CampingAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So in his 8th game with Texas, he's already hit 40% of the homers he did in Houston?
Player To Be Named Later
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sequencing
PacifistAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Gomez was bad for a lineup that is desperate for production......like Houston.

Put him #8 in this lineup, have another team pay for it, and it isn't so bad.
aggietony2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
"Astros are paying for him"

WGAF? You clowns act like the fans have to mail a check every week.
When your team is known for not spending money, it should hurt when you realize you're spending money for another team's player.
ebdb_bnb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clearly the Astros didn't GAF since they cut him knowing they would have to pay him.
ebdb_bnb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ah so it would have been better to keep him and take up a spot for someone could play, got it.
PacifistAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Clearly the Astros didn't GAF since they cut him knowing they would have to pay him.
If you don't think they care about paying him to play for a division rival that you are currently chasing, then I don't know what to say. Sure they knew they'd still have to pay him regardless of who he signed with, but you're kidding yourself if you don't think paying him to play for the Rangers isn't bothering them.
AgFan1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
PacifistAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
We don't need him to be great. He's the #8 hitter. 2 HR and 8 RBI in 7 games is plenty fine for what they need from him.
wbt5845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Post game interview today:

Emily Jones: "So, will it be special to play against Houston this weekend?"
Gomez: "No, not really"
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
We don't need him to be great. He's the #8 hitter. 2 HR and 8 RBI in 7 games is plenty fine for what they need from him.
Don't forget pretty solid defense.

The Astro's are trying to measure Gomez' contribution to the Rangers on their own expectations. They needed him to be a Beltre/Beltran type in their lineup. Rangers only need him to be Moreland-esque.

Player To Be Named Later
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
We don't need him to be great. He's the #8 hitter. 2 HR and 8 RBI in 7 games is plenty fine for what they need from him.


These fangraphs nerds can't wrap their heads around that concept. That or they're trying REALLY hard to pretend this doesn't bother them.

Either way, suck it Houston.
ebdb_bnb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He was god awful. Why is that so difficult for you to understand? Yeah, it's "bothering" them so much.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
quote:
He's like 3-22 since y'all signed him. Congrats! If we're paying him, at least he sucks on the Rangers roster.
We don't need him to be great. He's the #8 hitter. 2 HR and 8 RBI in 7 games is plenty fine for what they need from him.


These fangraphs nerds can't wrap their heads around that concept. That or they're trying REALLY hard to pretend this doesn't bother them.

Either way, suck it Houston.
Ding ding ding!!
Player To Be Named Later
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You're happy he's gone, we are happy Houston is paying for our 8 hole hitter, your front office "DGAF", so we can stop talking about it. We can focus on chasing best record in the AL and you can focus on your Not So Improbable Wild Card Chase thread.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
He was god awful. Why is that so difficult for you to understand? Yeah, it's "bothering" them so much.
Oh we understand. He was God awful for y'all, and yet he's not for us. For us, he's merely mediocre, and that works just fine.
ebdb_bnb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice sample size you're using there.
Ag2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
You're happy he's gone, we are happy Houston is paying for our 8 hole hitter, your front office "DGAF", so we can stop talking about it. We can focus on chasing best record in the AL and you can focus on your Not So Improbable Wild Card Chase thread.
Actually "chasing" implies that we're behind. Defending the best record in the AL is more accurate.
Player To Be Named Later
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Valid point
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Nice sample size you're using there.
It's what we got at this point.
ebdb_bnb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just looked. He's hitting .153. When has that ever meant mediocre?
PacifistAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Just looked. He's hitting .153. When has that ever meant mediocre?

As you've pointed out, we're dealing with a very small sample size here. BA can fluctuate wildly over the course of a week. The poor BA is offset by the HR's and RBI #'s. I think most fans would be fine with 8 RBI over the course of a week from their #8 hitter.

He's made some great defensive plays as well. Nobody is expecting an AS caliber player. We're not expecting much other than to be an upgrade over Stubbs and Deshields. The fact that he's essentially free is just icing.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
8 rbi's in 7 games isn't mediocre either

2 games this week where he hit bombs early that led to the team cruising to a W. 1 game this week where he saved a W with the leather. I'll take it.
irish pete ag06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
The 2016 Texas Rangers are making history. Their 30-8 record in one-run games gives them a .789 winning percentage that, if it holds up, would set a record for the best winning percentage in one-run games since 1901. But the Rangers have a not-so-slight problem that could haunt them in the playoffs: performance in one-run games is almost entirely though not exclusively a matter of good timing and luck, not skill.
This quote has to be from Fangraphs, right?

No, that's way too anti-Rangers. Must be the Crawfish Boxes?


Wrong again.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-texas-rangers-are-making-unsustainable-history-in-one-run-games/

More numbers nerds who are just haters, right?
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They sustained it all over the M's face this week. Not unlike the treatment they've been giving the stros for years.
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Meh... I don't recall anyone saying that this is sustainable. It certainly is a statistical aberration that likely will not continue into next season. Hell, it's aberrant to Rangers' history WRT to one-run games.

http://texags.com/forums/53/topics/2725463/replies/47010684

What is objected to is the reduction of it down to pure luck.
Gigem Trevas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
quote:
The 2016 Texas Rangers are making history. Their 30-8 record in one-run games gives them a .789 winning percentage that, if it holds up, would set a record for the best winning percentage in one-run games since 1901. But the Rangers have a not-so-slight problem that could haunt them in the playoffs: performance in one-run games is almost entirely though not exclusively a matter of good timing and luck, not skill.
This quote has to be from Fangraphs, right?

No, that's way too anti-Rangers. Must be the Crawfish Boxes?


Wrong again.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-texas-rangers-are-making-unsustainable-history-in-one-run-games/

More numbers nerds who are just haters, right?


irish pete ag06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
quote:
The 2016 Texas Rangers are making history. Their 30-8 record in one-run games gives them a .789 winning percentage that, if it holds up, would set a record for the best winning percentage in one-run games since 1901. But the Rangers have a not-so-slight problem that could haunt them in the playoffs: performance in one-run games is almost entirely though not exclusively a matter of good timing and luck, not skill.
This quote has to be from Fangraphs, right?

No, that's way too anti-Rangers. Must be the Crawfish Boxes?


Wrong again.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-texas-rangers-are-making-unsustainable-history-in-one-run-games/

More numbers nerds who are just haters, right?


http://imgur.com/a/NkerQ
Great job refuting the article! I guess that was too many words for you eh?
First Page Last Page
Page 98 of 114
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.