Ag_07 said:
I'm not convinced adding Bregman to this team as constructed makes them that much better.
At least not that much better to offset the luxury tax ramifications.
It makes absolutely no sense to build a team without Bregman only to come back and force him in where it doesn't really work on or off the field.
Totally agree in the long term sense.
Assuming they can do deferred contracts in large enough scale for enough people and money to drop the AAV across the board and stay below the CBT, then a 1 year with opt outs after would not be the end of the world.
But by the time Cam Smith is ready, having Bregman here makes no sense.
Dana made the Tucker trade to replace Bregman. Resigning him now makes that trade questionable.
But with or without Bregman, we are missing out by not deferring money. Yes it kicks the can down the road but it's a mechanism to lower your collective AAV, stay under the CBT and buy time for the CBT levels to rise in the future.