Houston..we have a problem....

7,990,596 Views | 29529 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Ag CPA
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A consortium of US oil companies basically will have access to the Saudi Arabia of oil without major exploration spending. XOM made a new 52 week high oil in the 50s and trading a PE well above its historical average. US oil majors going to catch a huge bid.
Dreigh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Calling it "the Saudi Arabia of oil" is awfully generous.
txaggie_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

ThreeFive
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is largely overstated for Venezuela.
donkeykick90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txaggie_08 said:





Evaluating reserves is a finicky matter. Reserves are variable dependent on commodity prices, capital availability, recovery assumptions, and infrastructure requirements. Not to mention that whoever audited the reserves was probably under some pressure from the Venezuelan dictator.

I'm not saying their reserves aren't top 5, but I'd caution when seeing these numbers.
Dreigh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txaggie_08 said:





Neat. What do you know about the methodology for generating those numbers, and the quality of the oil in VZ, and the economics of it's recovery and sale to the global market?
CheladaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While you are probably right on their reserves being overestimated, there could also be a chance that these are underestimated, especially if you have more advanced and efficient (US) companies operating.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The gulf should benefit largely from this, right? The type of equipment you need to process their oil, isn't it pretty expensive, with only a few existing American refineries capable, mostly in the gulf? From what I've read, those refineries are already at capacity. But the oil is rich in ingredients that make a lot of high profit byproducts. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

My thinking is, let the dust settle, then short the **** out of Canadian oil. Bye bye crap Canadian oil.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txaggie_08 said:



Does that include all our federal leases and Alaskan and offshore that are currently off limits?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Boogie6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

The gulf should benefit largely from this, right? The type of equipment you need to process their oil, isn't it pretty expensive, with only a few existing American refineries capable, mostly in the gulf? From what I've read, those refineries are already at capacity. But the oil is rich in ingredients that make a lot of high profit byproducts. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

My thinking is, let the dust settle, then short the **** out of Canadian oil. Bye bye crap Canadian oil.


Certain refineries / operators in the GC should benefit. Operators like Valero which have refineries that are capable of refining VZ heavy, sour crude - not all of the GC refineries are capable of doing so. Increase in the supply of VZ heavy, sour crude -> decrease in the input price (feedstock) for these refinery operators -> increase in margins if demand remains stable.



Dreigh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As of this post, WTI trading pretty dang green. Plenty of chop will make it's way in one way or the other (as always), but it should speak to the perceived downside risk to oil that was en vogue in regards to VZ over the weekend.
TxAg20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Until VZ production increases, a conversion of sanctioned (heavily discounted) barrels to normal barrels should make oil prices go up.
Ag CPA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are so many hoops to be jumped through and stars aligned in order to repair/update Venezuela's infrastructure and boost production, and that is assuming we are working with an amicable government there.

Hoping for it as it would be good for Texas in numerous ways aside from further depressing prices, but I'm not optimistic this early.
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This meeting of oil execs with Trump is something.
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump meeting with oil execs.

Trump: chevron? Where's Chevron?
(Muffled response)
Trump: oh there you are, thought you'd have a better spot.
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hopefully Wirth and Chris Wright were elsewhere having serious discussions.
Ag CPA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/09/trump-venezuela-oil-executives-white-house-meeting.html

This looks like a raw deal for the producers, no support from the government besides "security guarantees" yet expected to spend $100B on marginal prospects at best. No potential recovery of settlement awards for COP or XOM.

Besides CVX ramping up incremental production I don't see this going anywhere, Trump will be gone before there is time to get the infrastructure rebuilt.

Dreigh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sims said:

Hopefully Wirth and Chris Wright were elsewhere having serious discussions.


What serious discussion would Chris Wright be having?

Something about the next tweet Trump tells him to send?
PeekingDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sims said:

Hopefully Wirth and Chris Wright were elsewhere having serious discussions.

They were.
aggiesundevil4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wirth is recovering from a knee replacement and couldn't travel
La Bamba
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag CPA said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/09/trump-venezuela-oil-executives-white-house-meeting.html

This looks like a raw deal for the producers, no support from the government besides "security guarantees" yet expected to spend $100B on marginal prospects at best. No potential recovery of settlement awards for COP or XOM.

Besides CVX ramping up incremental production I don't see this going anywhere, Trump will be gone before there is time to get the infrastructure rebuilt.



It's too big of an agenda item for Trump. The majors will be in Venezuela faster than you think. Woods mentioned he was preparing a team to scope out the current condition of country infrastructure within two weeks. This administration isn't stupid, they understand the underlying conditions necessary to invest heavily in VZ. I will never bet against Trump when he really wants to get something done.
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Today is the 125th anniversary of Spindletop coming in.
Dreigh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
La Bamba said:

Ag CPA said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/09/trump-venezuela-oil-executives-white-house-meeting.html

This looks like a raw deal for the producers, no support from the government besides "security guarantees" yet expected to spend $100B on marginal prospects at best. No potential recovery of settlement awards for COP or XOM.

Besides CVX ramping up incremental production I don't see this going anywhere, Trump will be gone before there is time to get the infrastructure rebuilt.



It's too big of an agenda item for Trump. The majors will be in Venezuela faster than you think. Woods mentioned he was preparing a team to scope out the current condition of country infrastructure within two weeks. This administration isn't stupid, they understand the underlying conditions necessary to invest heavily in VZ. I will never bet against Trump when he really wants to get something done.


Woods scoping the current condition and actually setting up new operations in VZ are two very different things.

Meanwhile, the US is urging US citizens in VZ to leave the country ASAP.

Great optics.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
birdman said:

Today is the 125th anniversary of Spindletop coming in.
Going on 12 years for this thread.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Ag CPA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
La Bamba said:

Ag CPA said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/09/trump-venezuela-oil-executives-white-house-meeting.html

This looks like a raw deal for the producers, no support from the government besides "security guarantees" yet expected to spend $100B on marginal prospects at best. No potential recovery of settlement awards for COP or XOM.

Besides CVX ramping up incremental production I don't see this going anywhere, Trump will be gone before there is time to get the infrastructure rebuilt.



It's too big of an agenda item for Trump. The majors will be in Venezuela faster than you think. Woods mentioned he was preparing a team to scope out the current condition of country infrastructure within two weeks. This administration isn't stupid, they understand the underlying conditions necessary to invest heavily in VZ. I will never bet against Trump when he really wants to get something done.


Well, it looks like the largest Major is already out and I'm sure XOM isn't going to lose any sleep over it; the have better options to deploy capital.

I support Trump but he is in over his head in this one.
First Page Refresh
Page 844 of 844
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.