Houston..we have a problem....

7,461,182 Views | 28876 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by txaggie_08
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
this was an interesting article i just got:

link


Hmm. Clayton Williams selling off some of his shale assets earlier this year seems prescient now.
Aggielandma12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
digital_ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KY AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WTI closed today at roughly $61. Any guesses on how far it falls?
JP_Losman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
$60 per the saudis
Natasha Romanoff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm guessing it bottoms out at or around $55

Total speculation though
IrishTxAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WTI $58.50ish EOY.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:



Hmmm
MaysAggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm stealing this line from a co-worker when asked at a meeting today by an O&G CFO about when we think oil prices will start going up. His response, "When it stops going down". Sound East Texas logic that caught the CFO completely by surprise.
TxAg20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm going to guess we see $52 quickly if it closes below $60.
atmtws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rumor in our office today is that Continental is laying down all of their rigs that are on rig move (at least in ND). Cards are falling.
GarlandAg2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Rumor in our office today is that Continental is laying down all of their rigs that are on rig move (at least in ND). Cards are falling.
Of all the medium/large independents that is maybe the least surprising considering they sold all their hedges, correct?
IrishTxAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
Rumor in our office today is that Continental is laying down all of their rigs that are on rig move (at least in ND). Cards are falling.
Of all the medium/large independents that is maybe the least surprising considering they sold all their hedges, correct?


Correct. Hamm is a narcissistic asshat that's going through a nasty divorce. It seems like he's adopted a mentality of screwing his ex-wife by screwing himself. His stock is down over 50% in the past three months. Hell, it was down like 6% today alone.
ClickClack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Serious inside info that there may be smoke to the rumor of Shell buying BP assets.
BP plans to continue divesting to meet their (38?) billion dollar divesting plan to focus on their higher margin assets. Not a secret.

quote:
Bob Dudley, chief executive of the UK oil major, said on Tuesday he expected BP to sell a further $10bn of assets by the end of 2015. These sales would fund higher returns to shareholders and follows disposals worth $38bn over the past three years.


Link from 2013
FrontPorchAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would hate to be selling assest in this market.
Canyon99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I say $51 in early Jan.
Matt Schwab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dirty Mike and the Boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So I realize that hedging at least part of crude production is common, but how far back do producer's prices go? Are producers bringing more crude to market than would be anticipated to take advantage of the last of what will be $80-90 crude for them for a good amount of time? Sorry if that's a totally ignorant question, google wasn't helping me out as much on this one.
Matt Schwab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A lot are hedged 100% through 2015 and 1/4 to 3/4 of 2016. And those hedges will be in the high $80's to $90's mostly. But to add to that, they have to hit their production targets for those, which is where oversupply kicks in.
aggie028
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is hedged 100%?
Natasha Romanoff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
A lot are hedged 100% through 2015 and 1/4 to 3/4 of 2016. And those hedges will be in the high $80's to $90's mostly. But to add to that, they have to hit their production targets for those, which is where oversupply kicks in.
I know some that are better hedged than others for 2015, but I don't know of any that are hedged 100%..
Matt Schwab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean time wise as in all of 2015, not 100% of production.
Natasha Romanoff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I mean time wise as in all of 2015, not 100% of production.
Yeah but that could be as much as 75% of production vs 10%. Time-wise doesn't tell much.
Aggielandma12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Contractor SBM Offshore is set to slash 1200 jobs over the next two years and move headquarters to the Netherlands as weak market conditions hit the company's bottom line.

About 600 contractor jobs will go, as well as another 600 permanent staff, from around the world.
The company said workforce reduction plans would vary from country to country, based on local legal requirements and discussions with local representatives.

SBM said the restricting was expected to generate about $40 million in savings.
The redundancies will cost the company $25 million, with $17 million to be booked in 2014 and $8 million next year.

Chief executive Bruno Chabas said: "Although we regret losing some of our colleagues, we believe these steps are necessary to deliver value to our stakeholders and drive profitable growth over time."
The company has also decided to relocate its corporate headquarters to Amsterdam in the second half of next year.

"The international orientation, presence of many other stakeholders in the Netherlands, the company's Euronext listing and the proximity to the industry and Schiphol airport are expected to provide many advantages to SBM Offshore as a global player in the industry," it said of the move.

"Approximately 100 people are expected to work with the management board from new offices in the Amsterdam region.

"Monaco remains a strategic location for technology, engineering and operations."
Aggielandma12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good article about QE and Energy debt:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-11/fed-bubble-bursts-in-550-billion-of-energy-debt-credit-markets.html
KY AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting graphics from Bloomberg.

http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2014-america-shakes-off-oil-addiction/
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Interesting graphics from Bloomberg.

http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2014-america-shakes-off-oil-addiction/
That was interesting. One point they failed to make was that more people are able to work from home and would be an additional point of why there is less consumption.
bkag9824
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wonder if there's any significant reduction in nat gas usage in homes due to more energy efficient building materials and practices.

My new house used 449 kWh last month. We're not extremely frugal with lights, but we don't turn on em if not needed, run at least 2 loads of laundry/day, a load of dishes, etc.
TxAg20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
A lot are hedged 100% through 2015 and 1/4 to 3/4 of 2016. And those hedges will be in the high $80's to $90's mostly. But to add to that, they have to hit their production targets for those, which is where oversupply kicks in.

That's not how hedging works. It's a paper trade and rarely involves the actual delivery of physical barrels. Typical hedges involve swaps, puts, calls, or collars which is buying a put and selling a call together.

In a swap the producer simply agrees to sell so many contracts (1000 bbls/contract) at a certain price at a certain time. This is usually done close to the strike price for that futures contract. Let's say a produced decided in January of 2014 that they were happy to sell 3000 barrels in August at the strike price of $90/bbl. They would call their broker and tell him they want 3 August swaps at the strike price. The cost to enter this trade would be minimal since each side of the contract is taking on the same amount of risk. When the August contract expires, oil is at $85/bbl. That producer would then collect $5 per barrel from the counter-party to their swap contract or $15,000 total. If the contract expired at $95, the producer would pay the counter-party $15,000.

The same producer wants the option to sell 3,000 bbls in August for $90/bbl, but doesn't want to sell at $90 per barrel if oil is above $90 per barrel. He would call his broker say he wants to buy 3 August $90 puts. He has no risk if oil goes above $90 in August, but if it settles below $90, he gets paid the difference between the average monthly price and $90. If the August contract expires at an average of $85/bbl, the producer receives $15,000 from the counter-party. If the August contract expires at $95/bbl, the producer does nothing, his contracts expired out of the money. Buying these puts cost money because the risk is not equal on each side of the trade. The producer probably paid ~$3/bbl to buy the puts or $9,000 to enter this trade.

The same producer thinks oil may settle below the $90/bbl strike price for August, but they don't want to be locked into a swap, and they don't want to pay out money for puts. They can enter a costless collar in which they buy $80 puts for $1/bbl and sell $100 calls for $1/bbl. If oil settles below $80, they collect the different. If oil settles above $100, they pay the difference. If oil settles between $80 and $100, the contracts expire out of the money and no one pays or collects anything.

Now here's where your production targets statement is wrong; anyone can enter these trades whether they produce a barrel of oil or not. The producers are called hedgers and the non-producers are called speculators. If a company hedges more production than they have, they are partly hedging and partly speculating, but the commodities broker and counter-party really doesn't care. You rarely even know who the counter-party to your trade is.

If company X swapped 10,000 bbls in January on December '14 $80 contracts, but only produces 5,000 bbls, and Dec 14 settles at $60, they collect $20 x 10,000 bbls or $200,000.

Oil producers aren't typically speculators, so they rarely hedge more than they produce. In fact, if a producer has 70% of their production hedged, that's what we call fully hedged. The problem with the current downturn is there was a lot of backwardation in futures contracts for the past year. The front month was trading at $100/bbl, but if you wanted to swap 9 months out you could only get $88/bbl. Mentally, that's a hard position to take when oil is currently worth $100. Even a costless collar was $78-$98, so a lot of companies weren't hedging very far into the future either by time or by percentage of production.
what say you
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am rather inexperienced in the O&G market and after reading the Bloomberg article I had several questions that I am hoping you all can please explain:

1) What does "hedging" mean and can you please explain in regards to the O&G market?

2) What does "yield" mean and can you please explain in regards to the O&G market?

3) I noticed that the article said the most at-risk areas of O&G are the shale plays, but what about companies like Cameron, NOV, GE, Oceaneering, Schlumberger, etc... and their suppliers? What about the smaller companies, newer companies, who are hoping to one day grow into a Cameron, Oceaneering, etc... (I realize that growing into one of these companies is not easy nor overnight).
Dirty Mike and the Boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I am rather inexperienced in the O&G market and after reading the Bloomberg article I had several questions that I am hoping you all can please explain:

1) What does "hedging" mean and can you please explain in regards to the O&G market?

2) What does "yield" mean and can you please explain in regards to the O&G market?

3) I noticed that the article said the most at-risk areas of O&G are the shale plays, but what about companies like Cameron, NOV, GE, Oceaneering, Schlumberger, etc... and their suppliers? What about the smaller companies, newer companies, who are hoping to one day grow into a Cameron, Oceaneering, etc... (I realize that growing into one of these companies is not easy nor overnight).


The first part of your question is mainly answered in the post before yours. And as for question 3, I'm not sure if you're asking if non-operating companies will be affected or if companies involved in offshore o&g will be affected. The cop-out, but true, answer is everyone will be. And I would assume, could be wrong, but companies heavily vested in offshore stuff will likely be more affected than those heavily vested in shale considering their higher than average break-even costs. I don't see a lot of smaller operators, especially private equity, surviving a prolonged period of sub-$80 crude. I interviewed with a private equity operator in September for an internship this summer, and they were evaluating potential assets with a basement price of crude at $80/barrel. The operators who weren't overextending themselves when asset prices were unnecessarily high, especially not in high production cost plays will be the ones in place to take advantage of this period of time. While not good times to be in the industry or looking to jump in, its certainly interesting from a strategic business standpoint. This is when the companies ran by sharps can greatly advance their future market share.
Dirty Mike and the Boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good post, txag20. That pretty much covers what I was wondering.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tomorrow could get bad. Price action is weak
Aggielandma12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The offshore services companies will not be impacted for another 6-12 months IMO. A lot of projects have been tendered and are under way. Exploration will decrease drastically but development projects, specifically sub sea tie backs to existing facilities can still make money in the $60 dollar world.
KY AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Solid post, TxAg20.
First Page Last Page
Page 19 of 826
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.