I'm not a huge fan of hers. I love a good contrarian approach but her stuff is usually pretty weak in terms of detailed analysis and largely reverts back to her time at the fed in some role which I'm not overly sure what it was.
She's trying to backtest rates to asset values and paint broad strokes regardless of key things like inventeories, economic moats of certain companies among other things.
Never heard of her but I've read articles written exactly like that for months now many, many times with many different people professing it. I've also read counterpoint articles with the same level of non substance.
The reality is that we are in uncharted waters and no one knows **** about what's happening or what will happen because we have so many economically contradictory things happening at once.
She posted today insinuating that since investment grade bonds were pricing below par and that the market was signaling distress. I mean, spreads are tight right now and this is simple rate/duration.
If this is truly her take, she doesn't know what she's doing.