Tariffs "Across the Board"

26,575 Views | 220 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Gordo14
TheMasterplan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're not wrong. I just think it will be worse.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We can directly measure the economic impacts of tariffs. Unlike tariffs, there are legitimate roles for regulations, corporate taxes, and government agencies that promote growth and are net neutral or even bring in more than they cost. Corporate taxes rates and tariffs are absolutely not equivalent.
TheMasterplan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Legitimate in your opinion. Government agencies don't promote growth either. Again, you can't disparage tariffs while promoting these things.

Many think tariffs are "legitimate" as well.
Ragoo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

People do talk about those things. In this case, however, tariffs are directly a tax on consumption. There's no separating tariffs from prices and the price is felt most by those at the bottom of the economic ladder. In return they're being asked to shoulder more economic pain for some nebulous gains in the distant future, and those gains are for other people.
tariffs are a tax on importation, consumed or not. They could be consumed. They could sit idle and later consumed at a discount to move stagnant inventory. You don't know.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheMasterplan said:

Legitimate in your opinion. Government agencies don't promote growth either. Again, you can't disparage tariffs while promoting these things.

Many think tariffs are "legitimate" as well.


Government agencies often manage contracts that absolutely promote growth and have second and third order economic benefits in communities. Tariffs don't.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ragoo said:

Sapper Redux said:

People do talk about those things. In this case, however, tariffs are directly a tax on consumption. There's no separating tariffs from prices and the price is felt most by those at the bottom of the economic ladder. In return they're being asked to shoulder more economic pain for some nebulous gains in the distant future, and those gains are for other people.
tariffs are a tax on importation, consumed or not. They could be consumed. They could sit idle and later consumed at a discount to move stagnant inventory. You don't know.


The cost of the product is raised. If not consumed, the company that imports them eats the cost and must make up for the lack of consumption some way. Usually by raising costs on what is consumed.
TheMasterplan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like a middleman. You're shuffling money around and picking winners and losers. Just like tariffs.

This simply isn't true. You have a naive view of government.
TTUArmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheMasterplan said:

Sounds like a middleman. You're shuffling money around and picking winners and losers. Just like tariffs.

This simply isn't true. You have a naive view of government.
This is exactly right.

Anyone who believes government can allocate money better than the market holds a very rosey view of government...not that markets are perfect. The difference being, when markets screw up, the failures either drive them out or they smartly pivot to stay alive. We have a huge problem with zombie companies being kept alive by government's misallocation of funds and resources. And, there is no corrective action to shed the market of these companies...until now.

I think the DOGE team has done a fabulous job of exposing the tip of the iceberg on the waste, abuse, and outright fraud of government...some of it likely subsidizing these zombie companies.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheMasterplan said:

Sounds like a middleman. You're shuffling money around and picking winners and losers. Just like tariffs.

This simply isn't true. You have a naive view of government.


Tariffs aren't "picking winners and losers." There's no contract or allocation. There's just a tax. A consumption tax. As for a "naive view of government," you're approaching government from a hyper-reductive, extremely simplistic view. Defense spending, for example, has huge second and third order effects and it is simply not realistic that the private sector could handle national defense in any kind of comprehensive manner without the government picking what it needs.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TTUArmy said:

TheMasterplan said:

Sounds like a middleman. You're shuffling money around and picking winners and losers. Just like tariffs.

This simply isn't true. You have a naive view of government.
This is exactly right.

Anyone who believes government can allocate money better than the market holds a very rosey view of government...not that markets are perfect. The difference being, when markets screw up, the failures either drive them out or they smartly pivot to stay alive. We have a huge problem with zombie companies being kept alive by government's misallocation of funds and resources. And, there is no corrective action to shed the market of these companies...until now.

I think the DOGE team has done a fabulous job of exposing the tip of the iceberg on the waste, abuse, and outright fraud of government...some of it likely subsidizing these zombie companies.


Which waste, fraud, and abuse? Have they found any, or are they still triple counting fake numbers?
TheMasterplan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Uh tariffs are definitely picking winners and losers as they are used to protect domestic industries.

People pay higher prices for certain products due to tariffs whereas that extra cash/savings would've been used elsewhere in the economy. Look up the bastiat's broken window fallacy.

Same thing with increased costs from regulations, corporate taxes, price/rent controls and taxpayer money used to fund government agencies.
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TTUArmy said:

TheMasterplan said:

Sounds like a middleman. You're shuffling money around and picking winners and losers. Just like tariffs.

This simply isn't true. You have a naive view of government.
This is exactly right.

Anyone who believes government can allocate money better than the market holds a very rosey view of government...not that markets are perfect. The difference being, when markets screw up, the failures either drive them out or they smartly pivot to stay alive. We have a huge problem with zombie companies being kept alive by government's misallocation of funds and resources. And, there is no corrective action to shed the market of these companies...until now.

I think the DOGE team has done a fabulous job of exposing the tip of the iceberg on the waste, abuse, and outright fraud of government...some of it likely subsidizing these zombie companies.


The irony of this whole post is insane considering that Musk's wealth is mostly based on a company, in Tesla, that only survived from government handouts and continues to get more in government funding than DOGE is ever likely to "save".

amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

TTUArmy said:

TheMasterplan said:

Sounds like a middleman. You're shuffling money around and picking winners and losers. Just like tariffs.

This simply isn't true. You have a naive view of government.
This is exactly right.

Anyone who believes government can allocate money better than the market holds a very rosey view of government...not that markets are perfect. The difference being, when markets screw up, the failures either drive them out or they smartly pivot to stay alive. We have a huge problem with zombie companies being kept alive by government's misallocation of funds and resources. And, there is no corrective action to shed the market of these companies...until now.

I think the DOGE team has done a fabulous job of exposing the tip of the iceberg on the waste, abuse, and outright fraud of government...some of it likely subsidizing these zombie companies.


Which waste, fraud, and abuse? Have they found any, or are they still triple counting fake numbers?


Well they did remove the ID numbers from the wall of receipts so that people can't call them out for 99% of it being bull**** any more. I mean if we can't pretend that a 1.9 billion dollar IT contract canceled under Biden is actually a 1.9 trillion dollar DOGE savings, then what has the world come to?
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just some economic data in anticipation of "liberation day" as a nice baseline. Remember most of these fantastic (in a post-truth sense) numbers are BEFORE any tariffs are enacted...







I don't think I have to even post a stock market chart. Our allies are being forced to work with China because of our behavoir. Inflation expectations are rising - especially on cars. Looking forward to a liberating Q2.
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gordo14 said:

Just some economic data in anticipation of "liberation day" as a nice baseline. Remember most of these fantastic (in a post-truth sense) numbers are BEFORE any tariffs are enacted...







I don't think I have to even post a stock market chart. Our allies are being forced to work with China because of our behavoir. Inflation expectations are rising - especially on cars. Looking forward to a liberating Q2.


I mean, at least if we're going to wreck our economy, we can also lose all of our staunchest allies in the process.

Does anybody on this board or F16 even have a post from the past 5+ years about how upset they were that Canada was ripping us off?
Captain Winky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think I have ever seen anyone provide any source showing how we were getting ripped off. It is just a talking point that is constantly regurgitated over and over.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captain Winky said:

I don't think I have ever seen anyone provide any source showing how we were getting ripped off. It is just a talking point that is constantly regurgitated over and over.


Goes back to other countries who have protectionist tariffs for their own domestic products where we do not. Couldn't tell you what that impact is.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Captain Winky said:

I don't think I have ever seen anyone provide any source showing how we were getting ripped off. It is just a talking point that is constantly regurgitated over and over.


Goes back to other countries who have protectionist tariffs for their own domestic products where we do not. Couldn't tell you what that impact is.


How does that translate to us getting "ripped off"? We get their stuff cheaper. They pay more for everything. Sounds like we win.
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Captain Winky said:

I don't think I have ever seen anyone provide any source showing how we were getting ripped off. It is just a talking point that is constantly regurgitated over and over.


Goes back to other countries who have protectionist tariffs for their own domestic products where we do not. Couldn't tell you what that impact is.


They don't have protectionist tariffs. They have anti-dumping tariffs (quotas) that kick in if we were to flood their market with far more of certain things than we've ever done before. Many countries have quotas to protect their businesses from dumping - that is distinctly different than blanket tariffs.

I just think the idea that Canada or frankly any country is ripping us off when our economy and our businesses have completely outperformed and run over the whole globe under free trade conditions is hilarious.

Here's Canada:
https://images.app.goo.gl/YokLwuKVRwyAfEw49

https://images.app.goo.gl/3sEjVYoUKdKph4je6

https://images.app.goo.gl/rarN1aHfXV2Dyugx7

Economic illiteracy is king now.

Also the concept of reciprocal tariffs is hilarious. #1 can you imagine the beaurocracy needed to manage thousands of different tariff rates for every single country at every port of entry. I thought the goal was to shrink the government and make it more efficient. #2 why would we ever tariff Mexico for avacados or Ethopia for coffee just because they have tariffs for those products themselves. #3 Doesn't tariffing inputs that our businesses use to make things disadvantage US companies in global markets? Do we think that GM or Ford or boeing are going to be competitive now that their input costs have gone way up. What about complex business processes that go back and forth across North American borders - are we tariffing these things 3, 4, 5 times over and back. It is liberating the absolute clown show this administration is - **** according to Bloomberg they are still debating what they are going to do tomorrow right now. I've never felt more competent or qualified personally.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Americans in 2025 are the richest people to ever inhabit the earth. And we are miserable and angry about it.

Maybe mother Theresa was right and poverty is the path to happiness.
themissinglink
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We're waging war on a desolate French island off Canada that imposed a 0% tariff on us because someone imported ~$3.4m of goods from the island in July 2024 and they don't buy anything from us.

Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He didn't wage war across the board.

No new tariffs on Cuba, North Korea, Belarus and Russia.
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kansas Kid said:

He didn't wage war across the board.

No new tariffs on Cuba, North Korea, Belarus and Russia.
cajunaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Its almost like there is a trend happening here.
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
themissinglink said:

We're waging war on a desolate French island off Canada that imposed a 0% tariff on us because someone imported ~$3.4m of goods from the island in July 2024 and they don't buy anything from us.




I look forward to seeing numerous outraged posts about this island has been "ripping us off" for decades and how great this move is for the American worker.
themissinglink
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chappelle had a skit from 7 years ago on Trump's trade policy...

Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is what happens when Americans begin believing in our own form of Juche.
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great opportunity to start buying more equities
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Bisbee said:

Great opportunity to start buying more equities


Equities are very overpriced if Trump doesnt cave.
themissinglink
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Bisbee said:

Great opportunity to start buying more equities
Equities are down 3-5% based on yesterday's news. If the tariffs remain in place for an extended period of time, they probably should be down 40-50%.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also, I can't get the link to work, but it appears that they make have compiled and broken down their list by internet domain rather than country. That's why Diego Garcia and the unpopulated Antarctic islands are listed and Gibraltar and Reunion are listed separately from their actual nations. This is clown show level bull*****
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

Also, I can't get the link to work, but it appears that they make have compiled and broken down their list by internet domain rather than country. That's why Diego Garcia and the unpopulated Antarctic islands are listed and Gibraltar and Reunion are listed separately from their actual nations. This is clown show level bull*****


That is correct. Well not sure if they did it by internet domain, but we made sure to tariff the **** out of some small islands that are territories of other countries. Some of them are not much more than penguins. But it still sounds like the admin quietly didn't include Russia or Belarus.
IowaAg07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Red Pear Realty said:

I cannot understand how so many people are so bad at negotiating, or maybe it's just hatred of Trump preventing basic thinking skills, so I'm going to lay it out like you're 5:

Step 1. Trump posts:

"Thousands of people are pouring through Mexico and Canada, bringing Crime and Drugs at levels never seen before. On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders. This Tariff will remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!"

Step 2a. The president of Mexico responds immediately by saying:

"Caravans of migrants no longer reach the border," Sheinbaum said on Tuesday while presenting a letter she plans to send to Trump in the coming days. She also emphasized Mexico's efforts to curb the flow of drugs, including the synthetic opioid fentanyl, while noting that it remains "a public health and consumption problem within your country's society."

https://www.newsweek.com/caravans-not-reaching-border-says-mexico-president-after-trump-threats-1991916

Step 2b: Canadian leaders respond similarly:

The premier of Ontario, the most populous province and the country's industrial heartland, said Trump had good reason to be worried about security of the long shared frontier.

"Do we need to do a better job on our borders? 1,000 percent ... we do have to listen to the threat of too many illegals crossing the border," Doug Ford told reporters.
"We have to squash the illegal drugs, the illegal guns."

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canadas-trudeau-meet-provincial-premiers-this-week-discuss-us-ties-2024-11-26/

Step 3. There is no step 3. Trump accomplished what he aimed to do with a single quick and simple social media post. Get our neighbors kicked into high gear doing what he wants. This is what leadership looks like. You may not agree with the policy aim, but what he did was immediately effective.




I am still waiting for Red Pear to come on here and ELI5 how dumb we all are for thinking tariffs would actually take effect.
Red Pear Realty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sponsor
AG
You must have made a TON of money off the market knowing that tariffs would actually take affect! Such big swings in the market this week alone!
Sponsor Message: We Split Commissions. Full Service Agents in Austin, Bryan-College Station, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio. Red Pear Realty
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.