Jimma said:
Half ass offensive effort and a don't give a damn defensive effort.
I just feel they aren't coached well on defense. Every team we play exploits our weaknesses and we don't seem to know how to make changes during the game.
> Texas A&M vs Mississippi State <
6,021 Views |
83 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by cs69ag
I just feel they aren't coached well on defense. Every team we play exploits our weaknesses and we don't seem to know how to make changes during the game.
taylorswift13
Joined:
Jul 26, 2017
Posts:
16,750
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nixon - 3 unforced turnovers in a row.
C'mon Nixon!!! Quit throwing the ball away! Sheesh!!
It's just too easy for Mississippi State they are doing pretty much whatever they want.
On a positive note, MGreen has had a good game
When is the last time we were 1-7 in conference play?
Our defense isn't creating any transition offense. Our half-court offense is settling on keeping them in reach. The 3/4 court press took away part of their possessions but didn't create enough time pressure or turnovers.
They have the 4th quarter to solve for some or all of that. Hitting free throws would help a TON so we can score while the clock is stopped…
They have the 4th quarter to solve for some or all of that. Hitting free throws would help a TON so we can score while the clock is stopped…
Meanwhile, we are losing badly to a team that just lost their star player with an interim coach and a very shallow bench. I don't see many positives so far coming out of this game.
Game isn't over.aggiedrjdub said:
Meanwhile, we are losing badly to a team that just lost their star player with an interim coach and a very shallow bench. I don't see many positives so far coming out of this game.
67-49 MissSt. Timeout A&M. 7 minutes left.
greg.w.h said:Game isn't over.aggiedrjdub said:
Meanwhile, we are losing badly to a team that just lost their star player with an interim coach and a very shallow bench. I don't see many positives so far coming out of this game.
Unfortunately
Losers want the team to lose.AggieSports said:greg.w.h said:Game isn't over.aggiedrjdub said:
Meanwhile, we are losing badly to a team that just lost their star player with an interim coach and a very shallow bench. I don't see many positives so far coming out of this game.
Unfortunately
greg.w.h said:Losers want the team to lose.AggieSports said:greg.w.h said:Game isn't over.aggiedrjdub said:
Meanwhile, we are losing badly to a team that just lost their star player with an interim coach and a very shallow bench. I don't see many positives so far coming out of this game.
Unfortunately
No. We want the team to win. Or compete. Or show some sort of desire to send GB out in style. The bottom line is, we are realistic and just call it like we see it. Doesn't mean we don't support the team.
We aren't a good team. We are poorly coached. And we are now 1-7 in conference. This is on the head coach.
It would be really awkward if this team misses the tournament and Coach gets inducted to the Naismith Hall of Fame at the Final Four in New Orleans
aggiedrjdub said:greg.w.h said:Losers want the team to lose.AggieSports said:greg.w.h said:Game isn't over.aggiedrjdub said:
Meanwhile, we are losing badly to a team that just lost their star player with an interim coach and a very shallow bench. I don't see many positives so far coming out of this game.
Unfortunately
No. We want the team to win. Or compete. Or show some sort of desire to send GB out in style. The bottom line is, we are realistic and just call it like we see it. Doesn't mean we don't support the team.
We aren't a good team. We are poorly coached. And we are now 1-7 in conference. This is on the head coach.
Exactly
Looks like GB's dance with PITTS might be the only dancing we do this year.
Agree, I want the team be competitive and win some games. Right now they are just playing very poorly and that is on the coaches and the players. They very well may miss the tournament and be left sitting at home, which hope is not what they expected at the beginning of the season and it certainly wasn't what I expected.
Not just the coach but the administration. A classic case where management is not minding the store. Any good administration would have seen the writing on the wall 5 years ago. It was clear when Vic left for Miss. State and had a very good team his first year and I believe beat the Ags. Blair just shows up. He has been coasting around BCS for years with his cheer leader friends at the clip of 1 million a year. Wow what a deal.
I guess you slept through the last five years Rip Van Winkle…go back to sleep.Houstonag said:
Not just the coach but the administration. A classic case where management is not minding the store. Any good administration would have seen the writing on the wall 5 years ago. It was clear when Vic left for Miss. State and had a very good team his first year and I believe beat the Ags. Blair just shows up. He has been coasting around BCS for years with his cheer leader friends at the clip of 1 million a year. Wow what a deal.
Welp. I'm still excited to come to the game in two weeks.
fitzwatema said:
Agree, I want the team be competitive and win some games. Right now they are just playing very poorly and that is on the coaches and the players. They very well may miss the tournament and be left sitting at home, which hope is not what they expected at the beginning of the season and it certainly wasn't what I expected.
I'm just dumbfounded at the awful playing. I want to think positive - I REALLY REALLY do. This is the first time in my 10 years of being a season ticket holder that I am disappointed in my team. I just don't understand WTF is going on with the team!
Vic left right after we won a National Championship. They where not very good until year 3, we beat them first two years then he beat us in year 3.Houstonag said:
Not just the coach but the administration. A classic case where management is not minding the store. Any good administration would have seen the writing on the wall 5 years ago. It was clear when Vic left for Miss. State and had a very good team his first year and I believe beat the Ags. Blair just shows up. He has been coasting around BCS for years with his cheer leader friends at the clip of 1 million a year. Wow what a deal.
So what was clear again?
I can understand a discussion on should Gary have left last year but to say he should have been fired the year he won a title to hire Vic, cause Gary wasn't going to retire, doesn't seem like mgt not minding the store.
BQ_90 said:Vic left right after we won a National Championship. They where not very good until year 3, we beat them first two years then he beat us in year 3.Houstonag said:
Not just the coach but the administration. A classic case where management is not minding the store. Any good administration would have seen the writing on the wall 5 years ago. It was clear when Vic left for Miss. State and had a very good team his first year and I believe beat the Ags. Blair just shows up. He has been coasting around BCS for years with his cheer leader friends at the clip of 1 million a year. Wow what a deal.
So what was clear again?
I can understand a discussion on should Gary have left last year but to say he should have been fired the year he won a title to hire Vic, cause Gary wasn't going to retire, doesn't seem like mgt not minding the store.
I don't believe anyone said that? I missed it I'd they did.
Kbeauty63 said:fitzwatema said:
Agree, I want the team be competitive and win some games. Right now they are just playing very poorly and that is on the coaches and the players. They very well may miss the tournament and be left sitting at home, which hope is not what they expected at the beginning of the season and it certainly wasn't what I expected.
I'm just dumbfounded at the awful playing. I want to think positive - I REALLY REALLY do. This is the first time in my 10 years of being a season ticket holder that I am disappointed in my team. I just don't understand WTF is going on with the team!
I think that's how most of us feel.
The poster said management was not minding the store and that was clear when Vic left, so you tell me what that means. Then said Vic beat, which isn't true. Only way I understand that post is we should,have fired Gary and hired Vic then. What do you think it meant?aggiedrjdub said:BQ_90 said:Vic left right after we won a National Championship. They where not very good until year 3, we beat them first two years then he beat us in year 3.Houstonag said:
Not just the coach but the administration. A classic case where management is not minding the store. Any good administration would have seen the writing on the wall 5 years ago. It was clear when Vic left for Miss. State and had a very good team his first year and I believe beat the Ags. Blair just shows up. He has been coasting around BCS for years with his cheer leader friends at the clip of 1 million a year. Wow what a deal.
So what was clear again?
I can understand a discussion on should Gary have left last year but to say he should have been fired the year he won a title to hire Vic, cause Gary wasn't going to retire, doesn't seem like mgt not minding the store.
I don't believe anyone said that? I missed it I'd they did.
You have retiring coach, you have two new assistants that came in knowing that pretty much one year deal.Kbeauty63 said:fitzwatema said:
Agree, I want the team be competitive and win some games. Right now they are just playing very poorly and that is on the coaches and the players. They very well may miss the tournament and be left sitting at home, which hope is not what they expected at the beginning of the season and it certainly wasn't what I expected.
I'm just dumbfounded at the awful playing. I want to think positive - I REALLY REALLY do. This is the first time in my 10 years of being a season ticket holder that I am disappointed in my team. I just don't understand WTF is going on with the team!
It seems to me everyone is mailing it in at this point
BQ_90 said:The poster said management was not minding the store and that was clear when Vic left, so you tell me what that means. Then said Vic beat, which isn't true. Only way I understand that post is we should,have fired Gary and hired Vic then. What do you think it meant?aggiedrjdub said:BQ_90 said:Vic left right after we won a National Championship. They where not very good until year 3, we beat them first two years then he beat us in year 3.Houstonag said:
Not just the coach but the administration. A classic case where management is not minding the store. Any good administration would have seen the writing on the wall 5 years ago. It was clear when Vic left for Miss. State and had a very good team his first year and I believe beat the Ags. Blair just shows up. He has been coasting around BCS for years with his cheer leader friends at the clip of 1 million a year. Wow what a deal.
So what was clear again?
I can understand a discussion on should Gary have left last year but to say he should have been fired the year he won a title to hire Vic, cause Gary wasn't going to retire, doesn't seem like mgt not minding the store.
I don't believe anyone said that? I missed it I'd they did.
Ok - perhaps? Idk. I think it's clear GB, Vic, and team were a force and it does seem like a lot of our mojo left when Vic went elsewhere. I don't know how you justify firing GB in 2011, 2012-14, but I do think our national championship opportunities left with Vic. Maybe it wasn't solely Vic and it wasn't solely GB, but the tandem duo were a great pair (along with johnie etc)
That is a legit question, clearly it's tough for a head coach to maintain after you lose assistants.aggiedrjdub said:BQ_90 said:The poster said management was not minding the store and that was clear when Vic left, so you tell me what that means. Then said Vic beat, which isn't true. Only way I understand that post is we should,have fired Gary and hired Vic then. What do you think it meant?aggiedrjdub said:BQ_90 said:Vic left right after we won a National Championship. They where not very good until year 3, we beat them first two years then he beat us in year 3.Houstonag said:
Not just the coach but the administration. A classic case where management is not minding the store. Any good administration would have seen the writing on the wall 5 years ago. It was clear when Vic left for Miss. State and had a very good team his first year and I believe beat the Ags. Blair just shows up. He has been coasting around BCS for years with his cheer leader friends at the clip of 1 million a year. Wow what a deal.
So what was clear again?
I can understand a discussion on should Gary have left last year but to say he should have been fired the year he won a title to hire Vic, cause Gary wasn't going to retire, doesn't seem like mgt not minding the store.
I don't believe anyone said that? I missed it I'd they did.
Ok - perhaps? Idk. I think it's clear GB, Vic, and team were a force and it does seem like a lot of our mojo left when Vic went elsewhere. I don't know how you justify firing GB in 2011, 2012-14, but I do think our national championship opportunities left with Vic. Maybe it wasn't solely Vic and it wasn't solely GB, but the tandem duo were a great pair (along with johnie etc)
During this period (2012 to present), we've had 4 athletic directors, 3 football coaches, 3 MBB coaches. Until this year wbb has made the ncaa every year. So the notion that Gary was mailing it in and mgt wasn't minding the store doesn't hold any weight.
I think most of the frustration is that we didn't build on the 2011 season. The fact that we are performing so poorly this season is salt in the wound.
BQ_90 said:That is a legit question, clearly it's tough for a head coach to maintain after you lose assistants.aggiedrjdub said:BQ_90 said:The poster said management was not minding the store and that was clear when Vic left, so you tell me what that means. Then said Vic beat, which isn't true. Only way I understand that post is we should,have fired Gary and hired Vic then. What do you think it meant?aggiedrjdub said:BQ_90 said:Vic left right after we won a National Championship. They where not very good until year 3, we beat them first two years then he beat us in year 3.Houstonag said:
Not just the coach but the administration. A classic case where management is not minding the store. Any good administration would have seen the writing on the wall 5 years ago. It was clear when Vic left for Miss. State and had a very good team his first year and I believe beat the Ags. Blair just shows up. He has been coasting around BCS for years with his cheer leader friends at the clip of 1 million a year. Wow what a deal.
So what was clear again?
I can understand a discussion on should Gary have left last year but to say he should have been fired the year he won a title to hire Vic, cause Gary wasn't going to retire, doesn't seem like mgt not minding the store.
I don't believe anyone said that? I missed it I'd they did.
Ok - perhaps? Idk. I think it's clear GB, Vic, and team were a force and it does seem like a lot of our mojo left when Vic went elsewhere. I don't know how you justify firing GB in 2011, 2012-14, but I do think our national championship opportunities left with Vic. Maybe it wasn't solely Vic and it wasn't solely GB, but the tandem duo were a great pair (along with johnie etc)
During this period (2012 to present), we've had 4 athletic directors, 3 football coaches, 3 MBB coaches. Until this year wbb has made the ncaa every year. So the notion that Gary was mailing it in and mgt wasn't minding the store doesn't hold any weight.
Gary Vic and crew came in 2003 They almost went the distance in 2008 but didn't win championship until 2011 - 8 yrs Then Vic left took with him our head of recruiting and coach Johnnie Harris , coach aqua Franklin, and Mary Baker who became Dir of WBB Operations
That left 1 coach Kelly and Eric
So we had to rebuild our coaching staff
So we had to rebuild our coaching staff
Guess we never really rebuilt a solid coaching staff or one that would want to stick around.
that was 10 years ago how long were Bob Starkey and Amy Wright hereaggiedrjdub said:
Guess we never really rebuilt a solid coaching staff or one that would want to stick around.
I guess I mean we never really rebuilt to that previous standard.
Featured Stories
See All
10:14
1d ago
7.7k
Zach Clemence leads Texas A&M's 3-point barrage vs. South Carolina
by Olin Buchanan
5 Thoughts: Texas A&M 92, South Carolina 69
by Luke Evangelist
5:03
1d ago
2.0k
Game Highlights: Texas A&M 92, South Carolina 69
by Reece Nygren
Skid reaches four as Texas A&M falls at Mizzou, 81-70
by Justin Paez