A couple of years ago that would have applied here as well...it's crazy up here...no inventory and strong demand.94chem said:
Holy cow. I could buy that home twice in Kingwood and still have money left over for a nice vacation.
new construction in Kingwood for < $120/sqft? must be pretty damn nice94chem said:
Holy cow. I could buy that home twice in Kingwood and still have money left over for a nice vacation.
Diggity said:new construction in Kingwood for < $120/sqft? must be pretty damn nice94chem said:
Holy cow. I could buy that home twice in Kingwood and still have money left over for a nice vacation.
94chem said:Diggity said:new construction in Kingwood for < $120/sqft? must be pretty damn nice94chem said:
Holy cow. I could buy that home twice in Kingwood and still have money left over for a nice vacation.
And I have no idea where the 3rd car goes.
No. But IDK why you'd build in Kingwood unless you enjoy your 30 minute ride to the highway. But $775K for wall to wall carpet and a postage stamp yard is crazy. What's even crazier is that the people who just bought that can deduct their interest, but I can't.
Tandem garage makes it a 3 car....pretty much everyone with a tandem uses that third spot as a work bench area or storage. Come to think of it, most folks with a traditional 3 car setup do the same.94chem said:Diggity said:new construction in Kingwood for < $120/sqft? must be pretty damn nice94chem said:
Holy cow. I could buy that home twice in Kingwood and still have money left over for a nice vacation.
And I have no idea where the 3rd car goes.
No. But IDK why you'd build in Kingwood unless you enjoy your 30 minute ride to the highway. But $775K for wall to wall carpet and a postage stamp yard is crazy. What's even crazier is that the people who just bought that can deduct their interest, but I can't.
don't mind cranky 94chem. He's vastly understating what things are trading for in the Houston area. As he mentioned, most of the nicer parts of Kingwood were built out decades ago so not a great comparison.ChoppinDs40 said:
I know. There are people who live in Ft worth and commute to Dallas every day. That was just an example.
Truth is, demand is just higher up here for aforementioned reasons. Maybe it's the type of people that move to Dallas vs Houston? (Tech, healthcare, etc. vs. O&G, again, simplifying) people that have a Tesla, Porsche and a Range Rover vs an F250.
There's a nice house on a cul de sac out here with what appears to be a multi-generational Asian family living in it. There's always 4-6 cars in their driveway/on the street. Every single one of them is Lexus or Benz.
Neighbor 2 houses down has a Porsche Cayenne, Tesla model X AND an Escalade ESV. Like, seriously?
Anyways. I think it's just a real life example of the "gdamn Californians moving in from everywhere"
The Facebook/nextdoor postings about all of our "small sickly looking wolves here in Texas" is a dead giveaway.
here you are exaggerating again. You may have lived in a home that had those specs, but I guarantee it didn't have that level of finishes for $200K.94chem said:
The Woodlands is probably 30 - 40% higher than Kingwood. A lot of The Woodlands O&G crowd lives in Kingwood because they don't want a $200K hit in their housing.
We basically lived in that featured house after Harvey in Kingwood. New construction, 3 car, 2900 square feet. Was about $200 - 220K. I see Zillow has it at $336K now. Someday when I'm dead and gone, the person living there will wonder why 3 oak trees were planted so close together...
So Kingwood has gone up 50% in the past 4 years as well. It just started from a much lower base.
Sure, educate me. Here's a link. I notice it was built in 2010 (I thought 2014) and is actually 2796 square feet, not 2900, which would put the current value (Zillow, I know, but whatever, you're the pro) at $120/ft. Anyway, that would be $380K if we added 300 square ft.Diggity said:here you are exaggerating again. You may have lived in a home that had those specs, but I guarantee it didn't have that level of finishes for $200K.94chem said:
The Woodlands is probably 30 - 40% higher than Kingwood. A lot of The Woodlands O&G crowd lives in Kingwood because they don't want a $200K hit in their housing.
We basically lived in that featured house after Harvey in Kingwood. New construction, 3 car, 2900 square feet. Was about $200 - 220K. I see Zillow has it at $336K now. Someday when I'm dead and gone, the person living there will wonder why 3 oak trees were planted so close together...
So Kingwood has gone up 50% in the past 4 years as well. It just started from a much lower base.
Feel free to send over the listing and we can take a look.
not much to explain here. Those finishes are in no way similar94chem said:Sure, educate me. Here's a link. I notice it was built in 2010 (I thought 2014) and is actually 2796 square feet, not 2900, which would put the current value (Zillow, I know, but whatever, you're the pro) at $120/ft. Anyway, that would be $380K if we added 300 square ft.Diggity said:here you are exaggerating again. You may have lived in a home that had those specs, but I guarantee it didn't have that level of finishes for $200K.94chem said:
The Woodlands is probably 30 - 40% higher than Kingwood. A lot of The Woodlands O&G crowd lives in Kingwood because they don't want a $200K hit in their housing.
We basically lived in that featured house after Harvey in Kingwood. New construction, 3 car, 2900 square feet. Was about $200 - 220K. I see Zillow has it at $336K now. Someday when I'm dead and gone, the person living there will wonder why 3 oak trees were planted so close together...
So Kingwood has gone up 50% in the past 4 years as well. It just started from a much lower base.
Feel free to send over the listing and we can take a look.
If it matters, there was a nice orchard in the back yard, and a huge utility easement outside the back fence.
I own 3 rental properties, so I'm listening...always like to learn more.
home
No, it was granite. I could smell the radonQuote:
agreed. that's low-end builder grade. is that formica counter tops?

I'd have to disagree. Both homes are pretty much in the same category. No way I would pay 700k.Diggity said:not much to explain here. Those finishes are in no way similar94chem said:Sure, educate me. Here's a link. I notice it was built in 2010 (I thought 2014) and is actually 2796 square feet, not 2900, which would put the current value (Zillow, I know, but whatever, you're the pro) at $120/ft. Anyway, that would be $380K if we added 300 square ft.Diggity said:here you are exaggerating again. You may have lived in a home that had those specs, but I guarantee it didn't have that level of finishes for $200K.94chem said:
The Woodlands is probably 30 - 40% higher than Kingwood. A lot of The Woodlands O&G crowd lives in Kingwood because they don't want a $200K hit in their housing.
We basically lived in that featured house after Harvey in Kingwood. New construction, 3 car, 2900 square feet. Was about $200 - 220K. I see Zillow has it at $336K now. Someday when I'm dead and gone, the person living there will wonder why 3 oak trees were planted so close together...
So Kingwood has gone up 50% in the past 4 years as well. It just started from a much lower base.
Feel free to send over the listing and we can take a look.
If it matters, there was a nice orchard in the back yard, and a huge utility easement outside the back fence.
I own 3 rental properties, so I'm listening...always like to learn more.
home